Are Zoos Unethical To Animals

Topics: Zoo, Natural environment, Extinction Pages: 5 (766 words) Published: April 19, 2015



In recent times, argumentative debates have been witnessed over the moral predicament that zoos brings concerning animals’ rights, liberties and ordinary behavior. Most of the people take zoo as unethical and cruel whereas others have the opinion that they are moral due to the fact that they support in study, safeguard, and proper treatment of wildlife. This profound topic has caused diverse responses and raising a great argument as individuals strain to perform the correct thing. Tuyl (2008), claim that, Zoologica gardens are confined area and coop that house wildlife. Hutchins and Keele (2006), debate that, zoos give a good condition for the wildlife, as they are freed from their natural habitats that are threatening and bewildering. They privilege that wildlife are in good situation when kept in the zoo due to the fact that they are supplied with free food, a life free of poachers, tough environments, and organisms. Nevertheless, there are numerous facts that intricate game reserves are unethical. This essay gives an account why zoos are unethical

To domesticate wild animals in fenced spaces negates this animal of liberty and the will to grow animals’ natural behaviors. Moreover, a zoo encourages the spread of zoonotic infections (Tuyl, 2008). Consequently, regarding animal privileges and liberties, zoos are extremely wrong and should be barred to give wild animals a chance to lives unrestricted from human involvements. It is crooked to hold faunas in the zoological gardens since they perform as cages that deny the animals independence. Some animal privileges societies advocate for the right of animals, a condition that is simply attainable when the animals are in the natural habitations. Zoos represent prisons for the reason that is small in sizes and limiting the aptitude as related to wildernesses and so, denying wildlife their freedom to wander and act as expected. It is dishonorable to have wild animals protected up in a cage, particularly in this age when folks have understood that every conscious being should be permitted to have its autonomy.

Entire living lives are allowed to their privileges. Wildlife has freedom to live in the wildernesses for the reason that that is their natural locale, which is a vital right. To take creatures away from their normal setting and restrain them in coops and walled spaces given by the zoos is a thorough abuse of animal privileges. This rebuffs wild animals the opportunity to behave naturally and participate in the dealings that nature envisioned for them. Wild faunas are incompetent to live quality lives once they are placed to the zoos (Jensen & Holmes, 2007). They attack on subconscious privileges due to limitations, thus, initiating some wildlife such as elephants to have depression because of disengagement from their herds (Hutchins & Keele, 2006). Human beings should allow wild animals to live in their ordinary surroundings, in the same way that no person would love to be transferred from the comfort of their home and re-located into the jungle.

People claiming that it is just to keep wild animals in the zoo have the notion that this action is purposeful for research and the conservation of endangered species. However, appropriate actions can be taken in the wild animals’ natural habitats, therefore, leading to better results. It is unethical for human beings to interfere with the lives of wild animals for research. It is inappropriate to transfer a wild animal from its habitat to study it. The results would be skewed because the animals’ natural behaviors would change with the changing environment. Human intrusion is also paving way to source of animal extinction (Tuyl, 2008). As a result, the suitable and moral action to consider in the attention of extinction and research is to lessen human intervention to get the best...

References: Hutchins, M., & Keele, M. (2006). Elephant importation from range countries: ethical and practical considerations for accredited zoos. Zoo Biology, 25(3), 219-233.
Jensen, D., & Holmes, K. (2007). Thought to exist in the wild: awakening from the nightmare of zoos. Santa Cruz, CA: No Voice Unheard.
Tuyl, C. (2008). Zoos and animal welfare. Detroit: Greenhaven Press
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Breeding Animals in Zoos: Is Really for Animals? Essay
  • Animals Should Not Be in Zoos Essay
  • keeping animal in the zoos Essay
  • Testing Products on Animals Is Unethical Essay
  • Zoos are animals' prisons. Essay
  • Are Zoos Cruel to Wild Animals? Essay
  • Perception on Zoo Animals Essay
  • Essay about Should Animals Be Kept in Zoos?

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free