Are leaders born or made?
Are leaders born or made?
Defining what best describes leaders, followed by the debate based on the assumption that some authors agree that leaders are born, some that leaders are mixture of inborn and taught qualities and others try to prove that leaders are made. Finally, it will summarise the findings and consider each view to draw a conclusion and answer the question if there is such a thing as natural ability to lead which some people are born with and others not, or if not could this be taught?
Most authors will agree that leader’s whether born or made possess certain attributes such as commitment, passion, motivation and ability to develop and pass the vision (Cacioppe 1998, Ackhoff 2005, Brungardt 2013). Furthermore they own capability to inspire and influence the followers, like an orchestra conductors (Popper 2005, Lloyd 1994). Nevertheless, despite the common characteristic of a leader, due to a complex nature of leadership researchers and authors continue the on-going debate whether leaders are born to be leaders or made to become a leader.
Based on the theory that leaders require talent to articulate vision that inspires, which is not a transmittable skill but innate quality, Ackoff (2005) reassures that leaders are born. Leaders are born with the ability to reinforce values, initiate change, hence those behaviours require charisma, compassion and intelligence, skills which are inherit not acquired and those distinguish leaders from their followers (Shane, 2010). Nevertheless Rowley (1997) makes the point that innate traits are very important for a successful leader, however it cannot be viewed solely as a determinant of a good leader, as inborn qualities still need development and encouragement; therefore successful leaders are a combination of genetic and acquired factors (Elmuti et al. 2005, Mullins 2007).
Arguably Smith (2000, cited by Elmuti et al. 2005) disagrees with the myth about natural ability to lead. He proposes that leaders are
Defining what best describes leaders, followed by the debate based on the assumption that some authors agree that leaders are born, some that leaders are mixture of inborn and taught qualities and others try to prove that leaders are made. Finally, it will summarise the findings and consider each view to draw a conclusion and answer the question if there is such a thing as natural ability to lead which some people are born with and others not, or if not could this be taught?
Most authors will agree that leader’s whether born or made possess certain attributes such as commitment, passion, motivation and ability to develop and pass the vision (Cacioppe 1998, Ackhoff 2005, Brungardt 2013). Furthermore they own capability to inspire and influence the followers, like an orchestra conductors (Popper 2005, Lloyd 1994). Nevertheless, despite the common characteristic of a leader, due to a complex nature of leadership researchers and authors continue the on-going debate whether leaders are born to be leaders or made to become a leader.
Based on the theory that leaders require talent to articulate vision that inspires, which is not a transmittable skill but innate quality, Ackoff (2005) reassures that leaders are born. Leaders are born with the ability to reinforce values, initiate change, hence those behaviours require charisma, compassion and intelligence, skills which are inherit not acquired and those distinguish leaders from their followers (Shane, 2010). Nevertheless Rowley (1997) makes the point that innate traits are very important for a successful leader, however it cannot be viewed solely as a determinant of a good leader, as inborn qualities still need development and encouragement; therefore successful leaders are a combination of genetic and acquired factors (Elmuti et al. 2005, Mullins 2007).
Arguably Smith (2000, cited by Elmuti et al. 2005) disagrees with the myth about natural ability to lead. He proposes that leaders are
Bibliography: Ackhoff, R.L. (2005) What constitutes leadership and why it can’t be taught. Handbook of Business Strategy, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp.193-195. Allio, R.J. (2005) Leadership development: teaching versus learning. Management Decision, Vol. 43 No. 7/8, pp. 1071-1077. Brungardt, C.(2013) The Making of Leaders: A Review of the Research in Leadership Development and Education. The Journal of Leadership Studies, Vol.3 No.3, pp. 80-95. Cacioppe, R. (1998) Leaders developing leaders: an effective way to enhance leadership development programs. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol.19 No. 4, pp. 194-198. Elmuti,D., Minnis,W. and Abbey,M. (2005) Does Education have a role in developing leadership skills? Management Decision, Vol.43 No.7/8, pp.1018-1031. Kagan,S.S.(1998) Leadership development: the heart of the matter. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol.12 No.2, pp. 74-81. Lloyd,B. (1994) Leadership and Learning. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 15 No.4, pp.19-25 Mullins, J.L Poper, M. (2005) Main principles and practices in leader development. Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, Vol. 26 No.1, pp.62-75. Rowley,J. (1997) Academic leaders: born or made? Industrial and commercial training, Vol.29 No. 3, pp.78-84. Shane, S. (2010) Born Entrepreneurs, Born Leaders: How Your Genes Affect Your Work Life. New York: Oxford University Press.