Preview

Are Law Enforcement Cameras Invasion Of Privacy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1052 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are Law Enforcement Cameras Invasion Of Privacy
Privacy, the state of being free from a public attention, is a very sensitive and debatable topic in today’s world. What is an invasion of privacy? It is the invasion into another personal life of another individual, with no cause. Law enforcement cameras are cameras, body worn police cameras, and hidden cameras of all types. Closed circuit television, also known as surveillance, is the use of video cameras to transmit a signal to a specific place or close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal, on a limited set of monitors. One of the reasons the government provides law enforcement cameras is for protection and safety for the community. The governmental surveillance is not about the government collecting the information …show more content…
The 42 percent stated that law enforcement cameras are an invasion of privacy. The problem is not so much the laws, but it is the high handed way they are enforced that is the issue with some of this, not to mention the suspicion of committing crime versus the actual crime itself. They states that people should not have to fear the law or feel the need to walk on eggshells just so they do not get into trouble for something. ("Are Law Enforcement Cameras an Invasion of Privacy?" Are Law Enforcement Cameras an Invasion of Privacy? Web. 23 Nov. …show more content…
Law enforcement cameras are around for the safety, for yourself and the public. Without the use of this, majority of people would be able to get away with a lot of wrongdoing things and a lot of people would get accused of or get blamed for wrongful things they probably did not even do. No such criminal wants to be caught or seen and do not want to take any chances that anybody will be able to see them in their act of illegal activity. If a criminal see cameras chances are that they will be deterred from carrying out their criminal activity around. Study shows surveillance cameras reduce crime. A University of Leicester report from the year 2005 had showed that camera surveillance decreased vehicle theft from parking garages.Police officers can not be everywhere or any place at the same time. Now they do not have to be thanks to some high tech help. It gives police departments added power and control to protect their communities from crimes being committed. The police stated that it has a proven track record of helping to prevent crime. Video cameras not only help in identifying a public enemy of crimes that have already taken place, but serve as a deterrent against other crimes. As long as the law enforcement cameras are placed within public places (not on private property, such as bathrooms or homes) then they do not invade the privacy of citizens. Law Enforcement cameras are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A district attorney in Colorado, Peter Weir, claimed it is a necessity to gain or enhance public trust because it will lead to a better and safe society, also that body-worn cameras can lead towards that dream society (“Police Body Cameras”). A society without public trust for cops could lead to riots, possible anarchy, and disdain for police. Chaos and rioting did occur in several cities where body-cameras were not used, like in the Trevon martin case and in Ferguson. Body-cameras may have had an impact on those events since the court would have had the evidence to charge the actual people guilty, which in turn would gain public trust for officers. Also in the same study, according to the Rialto, California project, complaints about officers, who used body-cameras, dropped from 0.7 to 0.07 per 1,000 contacts with the public in this year-long study (Mohney). That is a huge drop in complaints, this is because the cops knew their actions were being recorded and were acting the proper way. Not only does body-cameras restore public trust, but helps the Police Department treat officers according to their…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    police camera’s could also bring ideas in on what its like to be a cop. It could show you all the things you do when you’re in uniform. Police camera’s are what we need in today’s society it could be successful if everyone come together and make it…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many risks taken when it comes to officers wearing body cameras and one of those risks are Privacy Implications. According to Policemisconduct.com,…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police should wear body cameras to restore trust, provide evidence, and give a sense of protection. Because of the unrest in Ferguson, MO and New York body cameras are being consider even more than before. Past and current situations are leading people to lose trust in authority. Communities are starting to question police conduct and if they are actually here to protect them.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Ropeik writes in his article entitled ‘Big Brother IS Watching, and I Feel Fine.’ about the the influx of surveillance cameras throughout public and private areas. There has been debate on whether or not there should be so many surveillance cameras or if there should even be more. Studies show that even though surveillance can invade privacy, they help lower the rate of crime or find the suspects after the crime is committed.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the accusation of police brutality is on the rise, there’s a question of whether police officers should or shouldn’t wear body cameras with their uniform. There can be many issues with wearing body cameras such as, there being an invasion of privacy and the expenses that come along with them. There can be many technical issues involved with the equipment. The cameras aren’t able to record 24/7 because of the lack of storage and battery life. This can cause issues with recordings of certain situations.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These cameras are direct violations as their rights as American citizens. Some body cameras don’t turn audio recording right away to protect the officer’s privacy but what about the people who are filmed without consent? Police Departments sometimes don’t release videos on the basis of ‘privacy’ especially on controversial cases where they should be available. Police officers do not like being filmed for their privacy issues but they feel it is okay to violate others. The only way that this filming without consent would be appropiate is if the recordings were meaningful and it was shown to those involved and were told that the video was to be shown in an investigation and possibly publicized. But even that still violates people privacy so there is no sure way unless the persons consent is given and most won’t give that. Privacy is a right and not a privilege and it should be respected as…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, police departments across the country have received much scrutiny for recent actions. The latest installment to the never-ending saga, that we all follow on the evening news, is the highly controversial topic of police body cameras. These cameras would attempt to provide an officers perspective to difficult situations and might help explain the actions of our police officers. Two recent articles published by the L.A. Times and The New York Times outline the pros and cons to making body cameras standard issue. The article published by the L.A. Times written by Matt Pearce takes a negative stance on the topic. The article clearly outlines the cons to body cameras and provides little insight to their benefits. The article published by…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Body Worn Cameras Essay

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    PERF’s recommendations provide guidance that is grounded in current research and in the lessons learned from police agencies that have adopted body-worn cameras. However, because the technology is so new, a large body of research does not yet exist regarding the effects body-worn cameras have on policing. Additional research and field experience are needed before the full impact of body-worn cameras can be understood, and PERF’s recommendations may evolve as further evidence is gathered. Like other new forms of technology, body-worn cameras have the potential to transform the field of policing. To make sure this change is positive, police agencies must think critically about the issues that cameras raise and must give careful consideration when developing body-worn camera policies and practices. First and foremost, agencies must always remember that the ultimate purpose of these cameras should be to help officers protect and serve the people in their…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    but body cameras can be a bad idea on some occasions because if a person is being arrested and spot the camera it can cause the person to go insane and start doing/saying things that can hurt the police and him/her.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wear Body Cameras

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With violence to the police on the rise, many people think that having a camera strapped to the officer’s chest or glasses is a simple solution. The problem is, cameras are now being handed out faster than regulations and laws can be made to restrict the use. Police are sometimes not even helped by the footage and are mostly the ones convicted by the cameras. In fact, Representative Jeff Roorda emphasizes that, “Instead of the cameras being there to protect the officers, they get disciplined for the petty stuff constantly—for violating the uniform code, or rolling through a stop sign for an urgent call, or for not turning the camera on. They’re tired of the nitpicking, and that’s what the cameras have been used to do.” This highlights the…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The small amount of monitoring that the United States does is nothing compared to what many other countries have done and continue to do. For example, in ancient India and China people were paid to spy on fellow citizens and report back to the emperor or king. Now, instead of paying people it is more cost effective to just have security systems, such as traffic cameras. There are cameras all over the United States and this bothers a lot of people, but if you think of these cameras as alarm and security systems on your house, you will be more inclined to accept them. You are often seen on your home security cameras, but so are people who are trying to break into your house. These cameras make your house a safer place, and the NSA does the same for the United States. Traffic cameras are all over the United States; there are roughly 30 million in the United States. According to data collected by the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety, 22 states have laws that allow or even require all kinds of traffic and surveillance cameras, and other States have laws prohibiting at least one kind of surveillance. However, for most of these states there are exceptions to the laws that allow the use of a specific kind of surveillance like traffic cameras. Security cameras are often used by law enforcement in order to find wanted criminals. In addition, many states are now using these cameras to identify wanted fugitives, as well as…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police body cameras make it more difficult for police officers, and they will not do their job as well wearing the body cameras. Some people might believe that they actually improve how the police officers work, and that it is fair for the victims. However they do not think much about the police officers, but they only mainly focus on the victims. Justin Ready and Jacob Young, two Arizona School of Criminology assistant professors, conducted an experiment that states key findings like, “officers who did not wear body cameras conducted more ‘Stop-and-frisks’ and made more arrests than officers who wore the video cameras. Officers who did not wear cameras performed 9.8% more stop-and-frisks and made 6.9% more arrests” (Kelsh). With that statement we should not have police body cameras because they are not helping police out in any way.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law enforcement cameras are unnecessary. Police men could still be able to protect their community without the use of cameras. How were the authorities ever able to confront criminals without cameras? I think they are very capable of controlling the cities without the use of unnecessary cameras. Before when we didn’t have the technology for cameras, the authorities had to work without these cameras. They had to be more effective they had to be more alert and careful to any criminal act around their community. They didn’t have cameras that watched everything on the streets, so they had to do it themselves they had to have their eyes wide open and watch…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Body cameras are seen as an invasion of privacy, as they provide state-owned footage. When police cameras are on, they will capture everyday civilian and police behavior that does not necessarily need to be recorded. Do all defendants want their arrests recorded? Do all bystanders want to be in those videos when shown in court(5 pro)? Civilians might not want to be video tape, or have there face on camera. Or the public doesn't want to be on camera. It is not practical to have cameras play constantly, there must be guidelines for when police should turn their cameras on and off(5 Pro). There has to be a limit on how long they can have their camera on. They most likely need to turn it on when there around the public or they get a compliant. Cameras also threaten to degrade civic values by turning police officers into walking surveillance tools. This could erode trust between citizens and law enforcement, as well as formalize casual public reconnaissance in a way that the NSA never dreamed of(hilliary). Civilians should trust the police and trust that they will keep the people safe. The camera give us another excuse to not want to trust the police. The police should be truthful and the civilians and they might have more trust in them.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays