Preview

Are Humans Innately Altruistic

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are Humans Innately Altruistic
How can one believe that humans are innately altruistic, when humans are the only species that selfishly keeps other creatures in captivity for their own happiness and maliciously murders organisms for their own pleasure and desire to prove that their beliefs are correct? Although people can show sympathy for others, people are innately self-centered because humans are motivated by their fears and desire to surpass everyone else, so they can have the most. Although humans naturally want to obtain more than others, they will always try to find the easiest way to get what they want because humans are lazy, which is why humans have decided to live communally. I was able to discover what humans are like naturally after I studied the philosophers, …show more content…
Humans cannot bare to see others suffer, so humans help those in pain. If a person sees a sad commercial about childhood hunger, that person would be inclined to donate money because he or she feels bad for the children. Adam Smith also believes people are innately altruistic because humans feel pity and compassion for others. For example, in the The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith explains that people are altruistic because of the empathy people feel when when they “see or think about a man being tortured on the rack (Smith 1).” People think of “enduring the same torment, entering into his body (so to speak) and becoming in a way the same person as he is (Smith 1).” When people see a person get hurt, they feel that same pain, so they feel pity or compassion for that person. Although humans can be altruistic at times, I still maintain that humans are innately self-centered. When humans see others in pain, they often feel some of that pain, though it is less intense. While humans may feel for the misery of others, it does not necessarily mean that humans will help the person in pain. Humans rarely give to those that are less fortunate and when they do, it is usually to make others like them. Humans know that if they give to the less fortunate, than they can manipulate other people to like and admire them. For example, celebrities often donate money to charities to make people admire them. Humans will only help others if it benefits

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I was first introduced to Peter Singer’s idea of altruistic poverty at Governor’s School. It suggests that to achieve social and economic equality, individuals have to give away all they have until they reach the poverty line. While trying to wrap my mind around this questionable solution to such a complex issue, I realize that my previous way of thinking had been so egocentric. If I gave everything unnecessary for my survival what would my life look like? However, as this idea unveiled my own inadequacies as an altruistic individual, I began to wonder why capitalism does not encourage this altruism from all economic classes.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In E.O. Wilson’s In Search of Nature, Altruism in regards to nature, whether is be human or animalistic, is explored through sociobiology. As Wilson compares the societies of animals and humans to further understand the inheritance of social behaviors, he notably credits altruistic suicide as the ultimate act of courage despite it’s probability to disappear over time. Consequently, Wilson’s use of sociobiology to understand altruism creates hierarchal standards for sacrifice that humanity’s conception of altruism will challenge as time progresses.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans have a common nature, the nature is benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom and moral consciousness as the content of social attributes, rather than the beast without other natural attributes…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great philosopher, Plato, back in the days of the ancient Greek civilization, concluded that man as a species can only draw from what his senses take about his surroundings. This includes his social relationships, eating habits, spiritual beliefs, and the many other attributes that make a person who they are. This theory/observation is very accurate about man back then and is also seen in everyday life even today. People are constantly leaving their imaginary caves in search of their inner-self and it begins in early childhood.…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Super Freakonomics Report

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages

    So though I do enjoy helping others, is it truly to help them, or my own ego, mindset, conscience? In the third chapter entitled ‘Unbelievable Stories about Apathy and Altruism,’ the first story is about a woman brutally murdered by her apartment and no one around; none of the numerous witnesses did anything to help this woman, or to stop what was going on. This sickens me. If one was to even help out in this situation, I wouldn’t even consider it altruistic; I’d consider it a moral duty. Unfortunately, I do not believe in anyone being simply altruistic, as much as I want to, and it’s sad. Humans are selfish animals. In this chapter, the authors write about an experiment done in a lab to see if altruism actually did exist by playing a game with money (a person was given a certain amount of money in which they had to split with somebody else). The average amount of money given away was twenty percent of their own, and although the scientists believe this to be an example of altruism, I have to disagree. I believe the people did that since it wasn’t their own money to spend in the first place—they hadn’t earned the money themselves, they were just receiving it, so why not give some away? Also, it would make themselves feel a little bit better; getting free money, it’s only fair to share some, correct? Their conscience came into…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oryx And Crake Analysis

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Darwin believed that sympathy was the strongest instinct that humans have (We Are Built To Be Kind). When we see another person in pain our brain lights up and reacts the same way as if we experienced that pain. Studies discovered that when we feel compassion a nerve called the vagus nerve actually lights up. Scientist studied how much different individuals vagus nerves reacted when shown images of people suffering. They discovered that lower class people vagus nerves lit up more than a wealthier persons. So poorer people actually felt more compassion that those who were more…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Now, let’s look at a definition of altruism: Altruism involves the unselfish concern for other people. It involves doing things simply out of a desire to help, not because you feel obligated to out of duty, loyalty, or religious reasons. (psychology.about.com)…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Altruism is found in many animal species, and the origin lies deep in evolutionary history… In nonhuman animals, altruism includes parental care, warning calls, cooperative defense, rescue behavior, and food sharing; it may also involve self-sacrifice…[honeybee] barbs have been described as instruments of altruistic self-sacrifice. Although the individual dies, the bee’s genes, shared in the colony of relatives, survive. Human altruism also originates in, and helps serve, genetic purpose.22…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kindness is a virtue. Among humans, this trait is remarkably important when it comes to the care and treatment of one another in a set community. As these communities evolve, it has been seen that the kinder, more positive group has thrived and therefore will continue to prosper. Many agree that we all obtain the quality of empathy, but it’s whether we choose to show it or not is what makes the difference. This discussion of kindness is seen in Olivia Judson’s passage, “The Selfless Gene”. Within this short passage, Judson discusses that empathy is deemed to be innate in humans. However, many argue that empathy is more of a choice, and we can choose whether to feel it or not. This ideology is expressed in Daryl Cameron’s, “Empathy Is Actually…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Response

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Singer argues that many people are not willing to put aside their wants, and make a sacrifice to help impoverished children. Now, evolutionary psychologists tell us that human nature just is not sufficiently altruistic to make it plausible that many people will not sacrifice so much for stranger (327). This statement saddens me, because what if that is your or your family, and somebody thought of you all strangers, and would not want to help your family out of poverty? Singer then explains that we ought to do things that predictably most of wouldn’t (327). Majority feel that if does benefit them in the end then why bother. Honestly, donating will benefit you it makes you feel like a better person, and you have helped an individual in need. Sometimes you should sacrifice your wants for others needs. As singer states the life of a child is more important then going to fancy restaurants, the next time you dine out know that you could…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is supported by Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. In this classic novel, a created "human" with no upbringing to speak of is shown to be selfless and even loving. It is simply in a person's nature to want to help, even if no one has shown them kindness before. The Creation states, "I was benevolent and good; misery made me a find." Obviously, this shows that he felt that he was inherently good, but his environment made him into a beast. The way every person he's met has passionately rejected him has an obvious impact. His nature was to be good and kind, but over time the repeated abuse made him vengeful.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that many people around the world are suffering due to lack of resources within their countries? Some wealthier people and nations decide not to help these less fortunate people as they would rather spend money on frivolous things and think that it’s not their obligation. I believe that man has a moral obligation to help those less fortunate than him, though I believe that it is not morally right to only help those who are less fortunate just to make you feel like a better person.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Altruism involves the unslefish concern for other people. It involves doing things simply out of a desire to help, not because you feel obligated to out of duty. It’s a traditional virtue in many cultures, and a core aspect of various religious traditions. If there were species whose only concern was themselves, they wouldn’t survive for long, would just quickly die off and leave the more selfless behind. Therefore, altruism exists for a purpose, and that purpose being survival of the…

    • 4135 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Are Moral Emotions Adaptive?

    • 3225 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Moral emotions are experienced by everybody in some way or form and relate to how individuals respond to moral violations. Moral emotions may be critically important in understanding people’s behavioural adherence (or lack of adherence) to their moral standards (Tangey, Stuewig & Mashek, 1992). Kroll and Egan (2004) state that “Moral emotions provide the motivational force—the power and energy— to do good and to avoid doing bad”. There are many moral emotions that individuals experience such as sympathy, pride and embarrassment; however the moral emotion that is going to be the focus of this essay is guilt This particularly links to Kroll and Egan’s (2004) definition of moral emotions focusing on avoiding doing bad. By guilt we refer to an individual 's unpleasant emotional state associated with possible objections to his or her actions, inaction, circumstances, or intentions (Baumeister, Stillwell & Heatherton 1994). There is substantial research into the topic of guilt, however it provides contradicting evidence to whether it is an adaptive trait or not. An adaptation can be thought of as a feature of an organism that has been shaped by natural selection such that it enhances the fitness of the possessor (Cartwright, 2008). Characteristics essential to adaptive behaviour are those such as maintaining survival and reproductive success. The essay question has been addressed by analysing research within different areas in psychology such as evolution, genetics, development, psychological disorders and behaviourism, and assessing whether the evidence found relates guilt to adaptive behaviour.…

    • 3225 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When you are posed with the question if human beings are inherently good or bad, you often find yourself floundered to find an answer. It is a fundamental question with no definite answer, only your conception of situations and human beings. People often look for the bad in the world, they point out the negative things instead of the positive because that’s what people want to hear about. The positive things are overlooked, which concludes with people believing that humans are inherently bad. Unfortunately, they do not recognize the many positive actions of others. Humans, when born, naturally crave love and affection. They are born without greed or desire. Mankind is inherently good, as demonstrated in the novel Night written by Elie Wiesel…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays