Preview

Aquinas on Conscience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
405 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aquinas on Conscience
Aquinas on Conscience

For Aquinas, conscience is the act of applying our knowledge of good and evil to what we do (or might do). So in order to (naturally) know what is a good action or bad one, one needs to understand how things are naturally ordered by God -- primarily what human nature is and what things it needs and deserves. This order which dictates what is good or evil behaviour is called the Natural Law by Aquinas. God can and does also supernaturally reveal what is and is not in accordance with his will, e.g. the Ten Commandments and Christ's Two Great Commandments. One also needs to apply this knowledge to what one does, and so one needs to be free to act in accordance with what one knows to be the Divine order of things, or not. Our conscience is our realization that what we might do or have done is good or not, but it is not the actual doing or the choosing. On a technical note, for Aquinas conscience is the act of understanding what is right and wrong, though the name may be applied by extension to a habit or power of performing this act of understanding. The virtue of making correct judgments about right or wrong, i.e. appropriate exercises of conscience is called prudence.
The reason that this is important is that one cannot do the right thing if one does not know what the right thing is. So, if someone has problems with their conscience, it does not seem appropriate to blame them. Children do not have fully formed consciences, and do not always understand what the right thing to do is. If a child does wrong because he or she didn't know any better, or because he or she thought it was the right thing to do, we do not (or should not) blame and punish him or her. Aquinas therefore believes that not only is one excused from wrongdoing if one's conscience is in error, one also is bound to do the wrong thing if one's conscience tells one that it is the RIGHT thing to do. He also believes that one has a duty to have a well-formed conscience, one that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In the Treatise on Law, Aquinas concerns himself with the origins of law. He wants to know the source of the obligation that law imposes. The questions are these: “By what warrant does the human legislator bind the consciences of people? Doesn’t this power belong to God alone? If people possess it, what are the limits within which they may exercise it?”…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The idea of God is intense, as both of these analyses have shown. Aquinas’ idea of God is “Ipsum esse subsistens,” or Subsistent Act of Existing Itself (Magee, 2015). To speak of God as a self-subsistent being is to say He “Just Is.” He articulates every creature is “fundamentally composed of essence and existence.” In order for everything to exist, there must be a First Cause and Aquinas says God is that cause because without it, nothing exists. God is infinite simplicity and perfect. Aquinas and Tillich both see God as Being Itself (Fesser, 2011). Tillich places God “above God.” He writes, “God does not exist.” However, this is not in an attempt to deny God, but to demonstrate that God transcends everything.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas is a well-known philosopher and theologian of all time. In the Summa question 6, article 8 talks about whether ignorance is voluntary. Involuntariness is to act against one’s will. Also, ignorance is the lack of knowledge. Aquinas questions how voluntary ignorance can be; he spends most or all of the eighth article explaining this. Ignorance can occur when one does not realize their ignorance, but their efforts to obtain the knowledge are of no advantage to them. In article two, objection two claims that sins imply ignorance and ignorance causes involuntariness. This leads to the idea that that every sin is involuntary. The second objection claims that sin infers ignorance, which causes involuntariness.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will begin with the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche whose ideals he defends with the genealogy of morality. In his book Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche is critical of “bad conscience” and considers it to stem from Christianity. Bad conscience as referred by Nietzsche is “the state in which an individual believes they neither deserve a good life nor are they able to create one for themselves.” Nietzsche believes that we shouldn’t focus on one right path to the good life because there isn’t one; everything depends on a person’s willingness to accept their past, embrace their present, and change for their future.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas' 3rd Way

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aquinas' third way argument states that there has to be something that must exist, which is most likely God. He starts his argument by saying not everything must exist, because things are born and die every single day. By stating this we can jump to the conclusion that if everything need not exist then there would have been a time where there was nothing. But, he goes on, if there was a time when there was nothing, then nothing would exist even today, because something cannot come from nothing. However, our observations tell us that something does exist, therefore there is something that must exist, and Aquinas says that something is God.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A. For Thomas philosophy is ancilla theologiae (handmaiden of theology). Aquinas was first and foremost a theologian, though he was quite capable of distinguishing philosophy proper from theology. He held that…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conscience is said to be a voice or feeling that dictates a persons moral decisions this feeling of a sense of right and wrong has no definite definition and its argued among psychologists, philosophers and religious believers what the true origin of this feeling is. Some psychologists argue that we are born with this and this part of our personality is created by our social surroundings and as we grow up what our society dictates to be right or wrong becomes hardwired into our brains and that forms our conscience.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my essay I shall discuss Aquinas’ understanding that blame is excusable due to ignorance if and only if they are involuntarily ignorant. I shall outline Aquinas’ understanding of voluntary ignorance and involuntary ignorance as an excuse from blame. Then I shall analyse this view, and conclude that whether or not the individual is blameable can, in some cases, only be prescribed by the individual.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas saw the conscience as the natural ability of a rational human being to understand the difference between right and wrong, and to apply the most basic moral principles to particular situations. Aquinas thought that there would be problems with people following their own moral sense, which lead him to natural moral law (NML). He thought that everyone should follow NML because they are moral laws found in nature (e.g. sex for procreation). He thought that the conscience was the intellectual part of you because you work out what to do using natural reasoning. Without following NML, people might have distorted judgments from their passions, ignorance and society and therefore different views on right and wrong. Therefore although he says that it is always right to follow one’s conscience, he does recognise that people may still get things wrong, through ignorance or making a mistake. Therefore Aquinas would not say that conscience should always be obeyed because a person may not be aware of the relevant moral principle. In order for conscience to work, a person needs to have some background information…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a theologian, Aquinas believes the supreme good derives from the eternal God, rather than a worldview good. The Natural Law theory is central to his work because it connects Aristotle’s argument and harmonizes it with the Church teachings. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believed the city was a mean to reach the ultimate end, which is God’s will. In his broad conception of explaining laws human beings should obey, the most virtuous ones are derived from God, not from man. He articulates the principle of obedience and how each person is obligated to perform their duties to society. This also is a slight critic from Aristotle’s teaching. Aquinas stressed the significance of duties, rather than performing deeds. Even though both words are relative to preserving and protecting the city, the teaching of obligations solidity the expectations of moral…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commor Core

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    conscience.(means) In other words, he his saying that a person who does what is right rather than the easier choice requires courage. This is proven in the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee shows how brave Atticus is for putting an effort into defending Tom Robinson (a black man), when it is unacceptable in his society, and obeying his conscience.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethicists such as Butler, Newman and St Augustine believed that the conscience was the voice of God speaking directly to us in our heads. Butler believed that the conscience was our natural guide and to not listen to its direction would be foolish. Newman famously said that he would first drink to conscience and then to the Pope. Whereas the likes of Aquinas, St Jermoe and St Paul believed that is was a gift from God, but was not the ‘voice’ of God. One question that comes to mind with the conscience being God-given is that, if it is the ‘voice’ of God or his gift to us, why would there be a need to disobey it? Surly God would not wish us to do immoral actions and therefore the conscience would only point us towards the rightful action which should be followed through. In this case these Ethicists would argue that to the only route of action is to follow the conscience fully.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nietzsche: the Conscience

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In his second essay of the Geneaology of Morals, Nietzsche attempts to identify and explain the origin of the conscience. He does not adopt the view of the conscience that is accepted by the “English Psychologists”, such as Bentham, J. Mill, J.S. Mill and Hume, as the result of an innate moral feeling. Rather, it is his belief that the moral content of our conscience is formed during childhood under the influence of society. Nietzsche defines the conscience as an introspective phenomenon brought about by a feeling of responsibility, in which one analyzes their own morality due to the internalization of the values of society. This definition holds the position that the conscience is not something innate to humans, rather it has arisen through evolution. In light of this, this paper will give insight into how Nietzsche reaches this conclusion, as well as what results from it. In order to do this there will be discussion of guilt, punishment, the will to power and implications from society.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas is a prominent figure for someone who believes, preaches, and teaches about Gods existence. Aquinas made what is known to be called the Summa Theologica. This piece of writing is known to talk about the relationship between God and man along with questions and articles to show that God truly exists. Part one, question number two in the Summa talks about the existence of God. In this section of Aquinas’ writing, he gives three articles which are questions to support his claim on the topic. The article contains objections to each question and Aquinas thus responds to it show what he thinks of them. This also includes Aquinas’ five proofs for the existence of God.…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays