Apush Dbq Research Paper

Good Essays
APUSH
15 December 2013 Most political disputes were mostly over the issue of slavery, the two sides of this issue were should slavery be abolished in the union, or should it be left alone. Because slavery was such a hot topic, many compromises including the Missouri compromise, and the compromise of 1850 touched on slavery, and tried to appease both sides. Compromise seemed to be the best and most effective to use in the early nineteenth century, but by 1860 this no longer seemed possible. The two differing viewpoints had little room for compromise this change being because of political, social, and intellectual reasons. As Political parties became heated the idea of compromise was seen as even more improbable. The idea of Westward Expansion due to ‘Manifest Destiny’ led to more territorial expansion. The North wanted these future states to be slave states, but the south wished otherwise this led to more conflict in congress. After the United States Acquired land from Mexico after the Mexican-American war, things worsened. The Wilmont Proviso (which panned to ban slavery in any territory they received from Mexico) although was unsuccessful, it split political parties and led to the creation of the antislavery Republican Party in 1854.
…show more content…
As part of the compromise of 1850, the Fugitive slave act was passed (The North to return runaway slaves to the south); in response the north established personal freedom laws. Essentially the North gets more from the compromise of 1850, and by not complying with the Fugitive slave law made it even more of a Northern victory. Northerners saw laws that endorse slavery as contrary to Gods law and therefore invalid, this unfairness in the Union caused a split to occur, a split that may not be mended. The election of a new president would finish the split between the North and South and lead to a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Pre-Civil War Apush

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the 1850s, the North and South could not agree on anything and were in constant disagreements. In 1850, Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850. In the compromise, it was said that California would be admitted as a free state which created a stir in the South since it would mean that the amount of Free states and slave states would be unbalanced (Shown in Document B). The North would now have power of the Senate and superiority over the South. The country would give Texas ten million dollars if they gave up claims to Mexico. This would take away a large piece of territory for a relatively low sum. There would be abolition of slave trade in Washington D.C., but not slavery. This meant that emancipation of slavery in the nation’s capital was starting. Also, Mexico and Utah’s slave status rested on popular sovereignty which leaned toward Free State status due to the incompatibility of the plantation system with the environment. Then, there would be a Fugitive Slave Law put in to place which would compel local officials to capture and return runaway slaves along with denying them jury trials, which some congressmen were against (Document F). Daniel Webster also delivered the Seventh of March speech backing this compromise up as everyone else did not like the idea and explained why he thought it was necessary (Document A). This caused the South distress…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes of the Civil War

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue on slavery was one of the causes of the Civil War. Slavery and slave trades had become a big part of the South’s economy. During the 19th Century, the North worked hard on abolishing slavery, which they thought was a disgrace to the Union. Compromises were proposed working toward an end to slavery. One of the compromises was the Missouri Compromise, which made Maine, a free state, and Missouri, a slave state, and everything above the 36° 30 north latitude free. Other compromises such as the Compromise of 1850 did please both sides. The Compromise included admitting California as a free state and interstate slave trade to be abolished which went in favor of the North. The Compromise also went with the South when it included stricter fugitive slave laws in document 7, the Kansas Nebraska Act, made it possible for new states to decide if they were going to be free, or slave states. The North and the South were far from settling the slave issue.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery and States' Rights

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The debate over slavery and states ' rights had become so intense by 1860 that the South was ready to break away altogether, and they did not want to cooperate with the North. They felt they were being exploited and taken advantage of by the North. The economy, culture, and various ways of life had developed differently throughout the U.S., creating a feeling of disunity. Resolving disputes threw compromise no longer seemed possible. They had no reason to compromise and work out their disputes because the South wanted to form a confederacy of their own. This all began to deteriorate because of the dramatic economic, social, and political issues, such as the Compromise of 1850, Fugitive Slave Act, political leaders, succession attempts, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act gradually became unfeasible nearing 1860.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1800's, Americans in the North and South often had conflict but could no longer resolve their political disputes through compromise by the year 1860. In this time period, compromise was not an option because slavery and states rights' caused political disputes between the north and south.The two political parties in the north and south lost their ability to cooperate and by the mid 1800's increased the issue of the division of the states.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As time passed the rapidly changing society in the nineteenth century, in 1820 the north and south began to have serious conflicting problems that were proved unfixable by compromise. During this time, the north underwent major social, economic, and industrial changes known as the Antebellum Period. While the south generally clung to king cotton and slavery and thus remained essentially the same. This arose a manifold of controversies with how issues such as tariffs, slavery, and land should be handled. Both the Union and the Confederacy tried to create compromises to resolve these problems, yet both sides were never completely satisfied no matter how hard they tried. This made it very close to impossible for them to completely put their differences at ease.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was effective for the southern states even though California was a slave free state in 1849 when California joined the union. (1) Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois managed to push this agreement for California to enter the Union as a free state but there were concessions made to slave owners about other acquisitions. (1)With this result the people in the southern states felt a relief of tension and a cause for celebration. This gave the southerners the right to retain slaves in those territories. (1) Congress cried “The Union is Saved!” (2) The Compromise had five bills which was intended to stave off sectional strife. The goal was on to deal with the spread of slavery to territories which in turn to keep northern and southern interests in balance. (2) One of these new bills was the Fugitive Slave Act which enlisted federal magistrates in the task of returning the runaway slaves back to their owners. (2) Another bill was New Mexico and Utah were allowed to use popular sovereignty to decide on the issues of slavery. This meant that the people would pick whether the states would be a free or slave state. (2) Also, one of the other bills was that the slave trade be abolished in the District of Columbia. The ineffectiveness of the Compromise of 1850 was ultimately it led to a Republican victory in 1860 and to the Southern secession. Also, it led so much more animosity between the North and South.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sectionalism

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The very first issue that caused sectionalism in the 1850's between the North and South was the Compromise of 1850. This compromise was a package of bills, passed in the United States in September 1850, regarding the status of territories acquired during the Mexican-American War. It was drafted by Whig Senator Henry Clay and was negotiated with Stephen Douglas in order to avoid secession or civil war in 1850. The Compromise of 1850 caused sectionalism in the Union because it first established California as a free state and turned down the Southern proposal to split California at the 35° parallel; causing the South to be frustrated at the admittance of California. To balance out the annexation of California, the South was pleased to hear that the territories of New Mexico and Utah would have slavery decided with popular sovereignty, meaning that the people who settled there would decide whether or not the territory would be free or slave. Little did they know that they were being cheated, because the land in New Mexico and Utah was unsuited for agriculture and not fit for slave plantations. The biggest blow that caused sectionalism in the Compromise of 1850 was delivered when the Fugitive Slave Law became more strongly enforced. The Fugitive Slave Law basically declared that all runaway slaves must be returned to their masters and anyone who assisted the runaway slave would be arrested. It also gave commissioners ten dollars for every slave that was returned to its master and five dollars for every accused slave released,…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Congress deal with the issue of slavery as new states were admitted and new territories acquired by passing a new law, The Compromise of 1850, which allowed Texas to be admitted to the Union as a slave state and California to be admitted as a free state. Proposals known as popular sovereignty took place and consist in voters in New Mexico and Utah would decide the slavery question themselves. In addition, the slave trade would be prohibited in Washington, D.C., and a strict fugitive slave law would be enforced nationally. These actions of the US Congress affected the tensions between the North and the South proving that the Congress could not easily resolve the nation's deep-seated differences over the issue of slavery trying to preserved the Union, it was just a temporary issue that eventually led to Civil War.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prior to 1860 the United States was already split into opposing sides fighting for power. Although these conflicts never reached the battlefield, the slaves states and free states were always competeing for representation in congress. Each side wanted more states for them to get more representation. To prevent too much conflict, they decided on numerous compromises such as the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850. Although these did ease tensions to some degree, they were only delaying the enedible. It started when Abraham Lincoln was voted as president. South Carolina was the leader of the southern states and began the cesession of the states. After Lincoln was inaugurated in 1860 seven states ceded from the Union and soon after four more joined them. The south believed that they had the constitutional right to cede. (Doc A) South Carolina feared that the north would gain enough power over the south that they would abolish slavery in the south. South Carolina felt that their powers were being smuthered so they had no choice but to cede from the Union. This of course was the start of a very bloody war for both the northern and souther states. This conflict led to the Emancipation Proclamation and the freeing of the slaves in the south. However this was only the beginning of the revolution which the nation was going through.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Where politicians came from also had a huge influence on their views. Those from the South favored the use of slaves while those from the North opposed it. When it came to deciding whether incoming states would be free or slave states, conflict arose. The Southern states were concerned that if another free state was added, that their candidates would be more likely to lose elections, and vice versa. Finally, the Missouri compromise was brought about which physically drew a line through the country at 36 30. All states above would be free, and all below would be slave states. Cleary, this led to a severe case of sectionalism; the country was divided amongst slave states and free states. With such sectional differences, unity was impossible, despite the fact that only Jeffersonians existed.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    american civil war

    • 1190 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Earlier to 1860 the United States was already split into disagreeing sides fighting for power. Although these conflicts never reached the battlefield, the slave states and Free states were always competing for representation in congress. Both sides wanted more states for them to get more representation and more votes. To prevent too much conflict, they decided on numerous compromises such as the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil War Compramises

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compromises played a big role in delaying the civil war. It was an attempt to slow the spread of slavery to the states up north and also to the territories in the west. It kept the nation united by trying to give everyone something they wanted, in order to keep them all happy. In 1850 there was an equal amount of the free states and the slave states. The territories and states did not want the government to control whether or not they were a slave state or a free state. They wanted to base the decision off what the majority wanted.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disputes of 1820-1860s

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Resolving disputes threw compromise no longer seemed possible. These dispute took place in the United States during 1820-1860. Some political disputes such as Slavery, political leaders, and successions of states made it hard for compromise.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Compromise DBQ

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The rupture in the United States that the argument over slavery had made was far too deep and wide to be mended by compromises alone. During the early 1800s, Americans were optimistic about fixing the slavery issue by passing laws and bills that satisfied both the North and South, but they were proved largely ineffective. It seems that sectionalism had begun to overcome nationalism. Northerners tended to not only disagree with themselves having to comply with fugitive slave laws and with slavery being legal in new states, but also with the South being allowed to practice slavery altogether. The South demanded that Northerners help return the Souths legal, property (runaway slaves), that citizens of the South who wished to move west be allowed to bring their slaves with them, and that the North not mess with the keystone of their agricultural economy. Hostilities between the two sections were seen everywhere from Church to politics, and at such levels that made it clear that no compromise could have possibly made everyone happy.…

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emancipation Dbq

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conflict erupted due to the point of high tension between the continuous dissension over the critical issue. Lincoln supported emancipation as a war measure for the beginning of the war in order to gather support for the Union. Lincoln declared that he will side with border states who abolish slavery. He hoped that support from these critical states would play a decisive role in the war. Emancipation was still seen as a war measure because there was significant opposition from the conservative supporters. However, Lincoln explains to a religious group that emancipation would actually restore legitimacy for the Union in Europe, as the consensus there was set on an antislavery sentiment. This would prevent European dependence on textiles and undermine King Cotton diplomacy. In order to set a moral framework, Jefferson Davis explains that emancipation would hurt slaves and the basis of his argument was that slavery was a justifiable evil. Lincoln still doesn’t fully oppose Davis by taking the position of abolitionism. Instead, he viewed emancipation only as a war measure and doesn’t extend full rights. Davis views it as an immoral act as it would create revolts and a race war in the South. The issue with compromise positions was that they were mostly ineffective in containing slavery in the South. Instead, they created dissent throughout the congress, making the critical issue worse. A motive…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays