Preview

The approach the Zimbabwean courts take towards the question of damages in breach of contract cases.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The approach the Zimbabwean courts take towards the question of damages in breach of contract cases.
INTRODUCTION

A contract (according to Gibson 1997) is a lawful agreement made between two or more persons within the limits of their contractual capacity, with the serious intention of creating a legal obligation, communicating such intention, without vagueness, each to the other and being of the same mind as to the subject matter, to perform positive or negative acts which are possible of performance.

Contracting parties through agreement, breach and operation of law can terminate contractual agreements. This paper will focus on termination of contracts through breach. Breach of a contract involves conducts, which are inconsistent with proper performance of the agreement. It is a violation of a material fact of the agreement. The material fact breached should go to the root of the contract.

In Zimbabwe, the main remedies available for a breach or threatened breach are; specific performance, cancellation, interdict and damages. The Zimbabwean law unlike the English law allows or permits the plaintiff to choose his remedies provided he does not want to just enrich himself. Further, the plaintiff should not endeavor to enforce two inconsistent remedies.

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

This is enforcement or calling of enforcement of the exact performance by the injured party to a contract. Our law does not allow a party in breach of a contract to rid their default by paying damages but, allows the injured party to demand specific performance, which however, is subject to the discretion of the court as was decided in Farmers' Co-operative Society v Berry 1912.

CANCELLATION

When there is breach going to the root of the contract the other party is entitled to cancel the contract. The injured party must elect within reasonable time whether to cancel or enforce the contract.

INTERDICT

It is a prohibitory order of the court that prohibits a specified act or acts. It makes it mandatory for the concerned party to obtain from doing what has been mentioned in the order. The



References: 1. Butterworths Digital Library, Zimbabwe Law Reports. 2. Volpe Peter, Commercial Law of Zimbabwe 3. Christie R. H, Business Law in Zimbabwe

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rules--- according to review the textbook, we could list some of law and concept to discuss this case, such as Privity of contract, Bilateral contract, Revocation of offer by offeror, condition, anticipatory repudiation, remedy and compensatory damage.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A valid contract is “breached,” or broken, when one of the parties fails to fulfill the terms of the contract. The party harmed by the failure of the other party to comply with the contract may sue for breach of contract. Most states require that the injured party file a breach of contract lawsuit within a specified period of time, referred to as the statute of limitations. A sample court filing related to a breach of contract can be seen in Example A.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 14 P6

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page

    All consequences of the breach of the condition are deemed to be sufficiently serious to justify termination. The buyer cannot terminate the contract if the non-conformity is a minor defect and slight breach. Slight breach is treated as a breach of warranty in the business sales contract. Slight breach is the breach when the conse-quences of breach do not go to the root of the contract or detriment the purpose of the contract. If the buyer accepts the goods there is no right of termination because termi-nation remedy required…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greenbik Case

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Common remedies for breach of contravention includes but is not limited to pecuniary penalties , damages and divesture . In some circumstances, non-punitive orders may be imposed.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PRETEST 2

    • 702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ____ is a remedy requiring a breaching party to carry out the terms of the contract.…

    • 702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bus311 Business Law I

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A contract is a legally enforceable agreement that is created when two or more people agree to perform or to avoid performing certain acts that they have a legal right to do and that meet certain legal requirements (Liuzzo, 2013). An example of a contract exists between an assistant and the manger. That contact can be extended once the assistant becomes a partner and so forth. Contracts can be extended or changed as needed to reflect the contractual relationship.…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the realm of contract law there are many ways of addressing breach of contract. The purpose of this paper is to analyze four separate scenarios and decide if the remedy of specific performance would be applicable to any of them. Specific performance is, “An extraordinary equitable remedy that compels a party to execute a contract according to the precise terms agreed upon or to execute it substantially so that, under the circumstances, justice will be done between the parties.” (retrieved September 7, 2013, from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Specific+performance) Or, to put it succinctly, the court will order the contract to be fulfilled as written, with no damages…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Legal Sufficiency 1. Adequacy 2. Unilateral Contracts 3. Bilateral Contracts 4. Illusory Promises a. Output and Requirement Contracts b. Exclusive Dealing Contracts c. Conditional Promises 5. Pre-existing Obligation a. Modification of a Pre-existing Contract b. Substituted Contracts c. Settlement of a Undisputed Debt d. Settlement of an Disputed Debt B. Bargained-For-Exchange 1. Past Consideration 2. Third Parties C. Contracts without Consideration 1. Promises to Perform Prior Unenforceable Obligations a. Promise to Pay Debt Barred by the Statute of Limitations b. Promise to Pay Debt Discharged in Bankruptcy c. Voidable Promises d. Moral Obligation 2. Promissory Estoppel 3. Contracts under Seal 4. Promises Made Enforceable by Statute a. Contract Modifications b. Renunciations c. Firm Offers…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Food Mart

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Both the business environment and the private sector use contracts as a means for agreement regarding transactions. For any contract to be legally binding four requirements must be met: 1) agreement, 2) consideration, 3) contractual capacity, and 4) lawful object (Cheeseman, 2010, p. 162). After the four requirements are met, it is the responsibility of each party involved to complete their respective obligations. Unfortunately, not all contracts will see completion. Events that arise in the course of the completion of the contract can cause breaches. Other times, one party in the contract fails in his or her obligation because of negligence. When contractual obligations cannot be fulfilled the injured party has certain rights to recover damages or force performance. In this paper the subject to address are situations that have arisen in various contractual scenarios. Based upon the contents of the contracts and causes of the contractual breaches, each scenario will address possible defenses and determine which party will win the suit along with potential remedies.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Little Legal Analysis

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Conditions, Mogul broken the contract and deprived Horatio of substantial benefit, so it’s treated as a condition.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Final Exam Essay Example

    • 2330 Words
    • 10 Pages

    __F_ 18. On a contract breach, the nonbreaching party's only option is to refuse to perform.…

    • 2330 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal remedy, for example, would be damages for a breach of contract. Under the law, a person who is party to a contract can recover damages if the other person breaches. The damages are equal to the actual damages or loss he experienced as a result of the breach of contract. The law stipulates that this is the appropriate remedy.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sale of Goods Act

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If a condition is broken, innocent party is entitled to repudiate the contract and claim damages.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unless terminated as provided herein, This Agreement shall extend to and terminate upon completion of Provider’s Work as provided herein. Client may terminate this Agreement without cause. In the event of termination without cause, Client agrees to pay Provider for all of Provider’s Work up to the date of termination. Either party may terminate this agreement for material breach, provided, however, that the terminating party has given the other party at least seven days written notice of and the opportunity to cure the breach.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legislation to combat unfair terms was first passed in the 19th century. Until 1994 the controls centred on clauses which exclude or limit liability; the principal Act is now The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA). However, in 1993 the European Council of Ministers passed a Directive on Unfair Terms on Consumer Contracts[1] which applies (with limited exceptions) to unfair terms of any type in consumer contracts. The Directive was implemented in the UK by Regulations made under European Communities Act 1972; these have now been superseded by the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (UTCCR)[2]. The Regulations did not amend or repeal UCTA; they provide an additional set of controls. The resulting structure is complex and proposals have been made to simplify it by combining the two sets of rules into a single one, modified legislative scheme[3]. The Regulations operates side by side with UCTA, so that is possible for a term to be valid under the Regulations and not the Act, and conversely. Or, to put the same point in another way, a party wishing to rely on a contract term will have to satisfy to both requirements of both sets of rules. The scope of the Regulations, however, differs significantly from that of the Act, so that often only one set of rules will apply[4].…

    • 3573 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays