Preview

Approach To Reducing Taylor Studio, Inc.'s Payroll Cost

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Approach To Reducing Taylor Studio, Inc.'s Payroll Cost
Linh Truong Alisha Wallace Nicole Ibrahim June 27, 2010 MGMT440, Summer 2011

Ethical Approach to Reducing Taylor Studio, Inc.’s Payroll Cost

Taylor Studios, Inc., a corporation in which we are the sole shareholder, has been facing some tough economic times. Recently the corporation’s accountant has advised us, the sole shareholders of the company were having a hard time keeping up with their expenses. The accountant has asked that we develop a plan which will assist the corporation in reducing payroll costs by 25%. In trying to figure out a way to reduce payroll costs, we have decided that there are several different ethical ways to approach the reduction: the conventionalist ethic, the end-mean
…show more content…
Traditional act-utilitarians disagree with these kinds of accommodations to deontological theories, claiming that it goes against utilitarianism at its core—which says that each situation should be evaluated individually, absent of any kind of basic, overriding set of moral guidelines. (http://www.scribd.com/doc/28066735/Utilitarianism-s-Value-Today) The distinction between act and rule utilitarianism is therefore based on a difference about the proper object of consequential calculation — specific to a case or generalized to rules. …show more content…
It is a good approach as it is subjective to each individual situation because the hedonic calculus allows for us to apply each decision to the different needs of that decision. However, in real world, utilitarianism is a weak theory to base on environmental ethics because it maximize human’s benefits but sometimes forget to treat the animals and nature the same. Therefore, to assess whether we can use it for the environment is difficult as there is no basis for whether all sentient beings are equal or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Eth 501 Module 1

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Everyone has the duty to make the right decision or action. The question with deontological ethics, however, is to whom or what is that duty. Utilitarian ethics have an easier way of determining the choice or decision at hand. What maximizes the most amount of good for the most amount of people? Deontological ethics, however, makes decision independent of consequences for the majority or for one’s self. A deontologist makes a decision because it is right. Also, deontological decisions are found to be moral only if the motivation is moral. If the motivation is not ethical, then the action itself is not ethical regardless of how much good was done in the process of doing that action. (Deontological ethics,…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With rule utilitarianism you first have to agree to the general rule then after you apply it to specific cases.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many strengths of rule utilitarianism over act utilitarianism. Instead of having to carry out utilitarian calculations for every act, we simply obey the appropriate rule utilitarian rule. Unlike following act utilitarianism’s rules of thumb, obeying a rule utilitarian rule can never lead us to act wrongly because rule utilitarianism defines right acts as those that obey the rules (as long as these rules do not conflict). Act utilitarianism requires that we do what produces the greatest utility in each given situation, even when that seems to go beyond the call of duty. Rule utilitarianism instead requires that we follow a rule or practice only if that rule or practice itself would promote utility.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of utilitarianism, actions are evaluated by the outcome. What we should do is to maximize the good outcomes and minimize the bad outcomes. The most promising way of reaching the final decision is to choose the one that would bring about the greatest net benefits to everyone affected by the action once the harms had been taken into account.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology is defined by the moral obligation of rules and duties. The rules and duties are based on the correctness or principle of an action without regard to consequences. This compares to utilitarianism where the right action is determined by how the action brings about the greatest utility to the group as a whole (Boylan, 2009). Both theories disregard the consequences of that action. Deontology ignores the all consequences, where utilitarianism ignores the consequences to the individual.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are obvious problems with both Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Both theories share the common goal of achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. However, it is impossible to measure or compare happiness, as one persons happiness may not necessarily be another’s. And how do we measure intangible gain, such as happiness against material gain, such as money? The root principle is a good concept, but it’s the means to which we arrive at the end that cause the problems. In my opinion, there is a greater problem with Act Utilitarianism versus Rule, because it justifies not only ethical but also unethical actions in order to achieve the desired results. It allows for the abuse of people’s rights, demoralizes and devalues the welfare of individuals if it brings enough happiness to the group. The group is nothing more than many individuals coming together to form a whole, and this group would eventually become just a group of demoralized and devalued people who would resort to any means necessary to get what they want because this is what they would be taught to do under the Act theory. This group would raise their children with these same principles, or lack of them, and the cycle would continue, producing a society that was almost egocentric in nature.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical philosophy which seeks to maximize well-being for the largest amount of people. This means that if you can secure pleasure at no moral cost, you should do so. It also means that if you can prevent displeasure for others without sacrificing anything of equal moral value, you should. In Utilitarianism the key is the well-being for the entire population.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Theories Chart

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | |Utilitarianism is a form of |Deontological Ethics say that all act are |emphasis on which rules people should |…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act utilitarianism and Rule utilitarianism are two forms of Utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is when someone carries out any activity which is beneficial among most people, in spite of the community restrictions (e.g. Laws) as well as individual feelings. Rule utilitarianism is when someone considers Law and is anxious with equality. Anyone who is a rule utilitarian tries to find out what benefits majority through equality.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flaws with Utilitarianism

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Among the most glaring problems that I see with Utilitarianism is its inclusion of animals under the umbrella that blankets this theory. It seems irrefutable that there exists an inordinate number of cases where the consequence that is against the best interest of an animal is favorable to humans, yet that dictating action is one that has been continually taken and condoned by the general public. This is a fundamental challenge, as the Utilitarian philosophy decrees that the pleasure and pain experienced by all individuals, including animals, has equal worth and must be considered when determining the net benefit of an action's consequences.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw and Barry

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two different forms of utilitarianism are described in our text. The first is called act utilitarianism. According to Shaw and Barry, act utilitarianism states that we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected (p.60).…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, utilitarian’s do not base large-scale decisions on their own beliefs or on their personal preferences, rather they consider the consequences and choose options which will benefit as well as satisfy the most substantial amount of people as possible. Within the theory of utilitarianism there are two significant groups that make up all utilitarians. These two groups are called rule utilitarians and act utilitarians. According to the textbook, rule utilitarianism states, “it is the long-term effects of the type of action that are relevant to deciding whether to perform a token act” (387). Additionally, it breaks down the possible consequences that may occur if a particular decision was made to perform certain actions. On the other hand, act utilitarians consider the effects of each and every specific individual action preformed. Without being able to understand what exactly utilitarianism is, it would be almost impossible to understand…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory and therefore when evaluating ethics and the environment they would look at the end result and not necessarily the action. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory and would look at the purpose or the end goal of an action. With regards to deforestation the end goal is to create space for new homes, particularly in Brazil and therefore according to utilitarianism this is ethical because it brings great pleasure to those who are provided with homes. Utilitarians believed that ethics could be found in what bought about the greatest amount of pleasure and providing these homes would do just that. This also according to Mill who was concerned with qualitative pleasure rather than quantitative pleasure is a good and ethically just thing as having shelter, a basic human need, is a high quality pleasure. However, the quantitative part of the theory with regards to deforestation seems flawed. It is inaccurate to calculate whether more pleasure will be gained from homes being provided for those without one, or whether more pleasure will be gained from preserving the forest, not only for those who are concerned with the environment, but also for future generations who will have to pick up the pieces. Instead it makes sense to select an ethical theory that is more practical in its method of dealing with deforestation. Kant would state that we should not be allowed to pursue in deforestation because if we made it a law of nature that trees automatically came down to make room for development and homes it would not work, as we would soon run out of resources and oxygen. This seems like a more practical way as it is absolutist and ethics based on pleasure when dealing with this topic is unhelpful.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism and deontology are two moral theories that can often pull us in different direction. Utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine that virtue is based on utility, and that conduct should be directed toward promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number of persons. This can be viewed as a contingent right. Contingent means something that could happen or come up depending on other occurrences. An example of a contingent right is the unexpected need for a bandage on a hike. The bandage is what the hiker needs and it will bring happiness to the person.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Feldman, F. (2003). On the Consistency of Act- and Motive-Utilitarianism. International Journal for Philosophy, 70 (2), 56-78.…

    • 2529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays