Preview

Apple vs. Samsung

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Apple vs. Samsung
Legal Case Review
Apple vs. Samsung by Michel Andreas Kroeze BIA512

A legal case review submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

BACHELOR OF ARTS IN INTERACTIVE ANIMATION

At

SAE Institute Amsterdam

29/04/2013 Word count: 4332

Table of contents
1. Legal Case Front page……………………………………………………………………..3 2. The Parties………………………………………………………………………………….4 3. The Lawsuit……………………………………………………………………...………....6 4. Apple’s Arguments ………………………………………………………………..………9 5. Samsung’s Arguments………………………………………………………………..…..18 7. Final Ruling and Conclusions…………………………………...……………........……26 8. Bibliography……………………….…….…….………………..………………………...28

2

1. Legal Case Front page
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) HMcElhinny@mofo.com MICHEAL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) MJacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) JTaylor@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) JasonBartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTAR 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 JOHN B. QUINN JohnQuinn@quinnermanuel.com SUSAN R. ESTRICH SusanEstrich@quinnermanuel.com CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN CharlesVerhoeven@quinnermanuel.com

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP. 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: 213-443-3000 Facsimile: 213-443-3100 Attorneys for Defendant SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA., INC., ; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPLE INC., a California corporation Plaintiff V. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA., INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Defendants.

Case no. 11 JURY TRIAL DEMAND COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT, FEDERAL FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN AND UNFAIR COMPETITION, FEDERAL TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT,


References: Guglielmo, C. 20122, The Apple vs. Samsung Patent Dispute: 20 Talking Points, Forbes, New York, Viewed 19 April 2013, Scottek, T.C. 2012, Apple vs. Samsung: complete coverage of tech’s biggest trial, The Verge, Little Indiana, Viewed 19 April 2013, Wall, M. 2012, Apple vs. Samsung: Case Overview for the Patent Trial of the Century, Brighthand, San Francisco, Viewed 19 April 2013, Lev-Ram, M. 2013, Apple v. Samsung: (Patent) trial of the century, Fortune, Viewed 21 April 2013, Daniels, L. 2013, Samsung Lawyer Assesses IP Legal Battle With Apple, Intellectual Property Watch, Geneva, Viewed 21 April 2013, Barret, M.P. 2012, Apple’s War on Android, Bloomberg Businessweek, New York, Viewed 25 April 2013, Wikipedia 2012, Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Viewed 26 April 2013, The Verge n.d., Live: Samsung’s closing arguments in Apple vs. Samsung, Vox Media, Little Indiana, Viewed 26 April 2013, Foresman, C. 2012, Apple awarded design patent for actual rounded tectangle, Ars Technica, Chicago, Viewed 28 April 2013, Clover, T. 2013, New Damages Trial in Apple v. Samsung Set for November, MacRomors, Glen Allen, Viewed 28 April 2013, 28 Biship, B. 2012, Jury: Samsung copied Apple, should pay at least $1.049 billion in damages, The Verge, Little Indiana, Viewed 28 April 2013, Macari, M. 2013, Apple’s bounce-back patent receives ‘final’ rejection from US patent office, The Verge, Little Indiana, Viewed 28 April 2013, 29
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    ACCTG 300 HW
    • 926 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ACCTG 300 HW

    W Inc, “W”, is a competitor of M International, “M”. In 2007, W filed a claim against M for patent infringement. By the end of that year, M estimated a $15-20 million loss, with $17 million being the most likely. On September 2009, a jury determined M has to pay $18.5 million in damages. Two months later, M filed an appeal to overturn the jury’s verdict. In December 2010, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of M and overturned the $18.5 million judgment. W filed a petition for a re-hearing in January 2011, but the matter was closed in February, after the appellate judges declined the petition.…

    • 926 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction To Legal Research: Parallel Bibliography
    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Introduction To Legal Research: Parallel Bibliography

    Star Charters v. Figueroa, 192 Ill. 2d 47, 733 N.E.2d 1282, 2000 Ill. LEXIS 987, 248 Ill. Dec. 284 (2000)…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ncr Corp V Korala
    • 4724 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Ncr Corp V Korala

    ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Page 807 512 F.3d 807 (6th Cir. 2008) 85 U.S.P.Q.2d 1481 NCR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KORALA ASSOCIATES LTD., Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-3685. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Jan. 16, 2008 Argued: Feb. 1, 2007. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Dayton. No. 04-00407-Michael R. Merz, Magistrate Judge. Page 808 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Page 809 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Page 810 ARGUED: Paul R. Gupta, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, New York, New York, for Appellant. Paul M. Fakler, Moses & Singer, New York, New York, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Paul R. Gupta, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, New York, New York, John D. Luken, Joshua A. Lorentz, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, Clifford R. Michel, Mayer Brown, New York, New York, for Appellant. Paul M. Fakler, Moses & Singer, New York, New York, William F. Patry, Thelen, Reid & Priest, New York, New York, for Appellee. Before: KENNEDY, BATCHELDER, and CLAY, Circuit Judges. OPINION Plaintiff NCR Corporation ("NCR") appeals Page 811 the order of the district court[1] compelling NCR and defendant Korala Associates Ltd. ("KAL") to arbitrate NCR's claims against KAL, pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 206[2] part of Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, see 9 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., which implements the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 38. I. BACKGROUND NCR is one of the largest providers of Automatic Teller Machines ("ATM") equipment, integrated hardware and software systems, and related maintenance and support services in the world. NCR's ATMs use either the Windows operating system or the OS/2 operating system. NCR installs its APTRA XFS software ("APTRA XFS") on those ATMs using the Windows operating system and its S4i software ("S4i") on those ATMs using the OS/2 operating system. NCR owns a registered…

    • 4724 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Apple Stock
    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Apple Stock

    - May 19, 2006: Apple Computer, Inc. filed a counter-suit against Creative Technology for dispute over patent rights over rival digital music players.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    court report
    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages

    court report

    4. John V. Komar is the attorney for the plaintiff (Malaysia Venture Capital Management Berhad) and Chris Kao is the attorney for the defendant (Mobifusion, Inc)…

    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Quality Inns Intl, Inc. V. Mcdonald's Corp.
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Quality Inns Intl, Inc. V. Mcdonald's Corp.

    In this case, the plaintiff is McDonald’s and defendant is Quality Inns International Inc.. The two companies disputed that whether the mark of “McSleep” infringed the trademark of “McDonald’s or not.” Quality Inns International Inc. used the name “McSleep” as its new name of economy hotels. McDonald’s Corporation responses to that, it said that Quality Inns International Inc. cannot use the name “McSleep”…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Google Motorola Takeover
    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Google Motorola Takeover

    References: Begg, D. and Ward, D., 2009. Economics for Business. 3th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw – Hill Education Limited, p. 155 Giles, M. (2011). Beyond the PC. The Economist [online] 8 October. Available at : < http://www.economist.com/node/21531109> [Accessed 2 December 2011]. Garside, J. (2011). Google 's Motorola deal is a gamble. The Guardian [online] 16 August Available at : [Accessed 2 December 2011]. Halliday, J. (2011). Google looks to 'supercharge ' Android with Motorola Mobility. The Guardian [online] 15 August. Available at : [Accessed 12 November 2011]. Merced, M.J. de la (2011). In the World of Wireless, It’s All About Patents. The New York Times [online] 15 August Available at : < http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/08/15/in-the-world-of-wireless-itsall-about-patents/> [Accessed 5 December 2011]. Rusli, E.M. (2011). Google’s Big Bet on the Mobile Future. The New York Times [online] 15 August Available at : < http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/08/15/googles-big-bet-on-themobile-future/> [Accessed 2 December 2011].…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Patent Warfare
    • 845 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Patent Warfare

    Walters, E. (2014, January 23). Tech Companies Fight Back Against Patent Lawsuits. The New York Times. Retrieved July 10, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/us/tech-companies-fight-back-against-patent-lawsuits.html?_r=0…

    • 845 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Outline how changing external influences affect organizations
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Outline how changing external influences affect organizations

    The first article shows that the court ruled against Apples favour stating that Samsung did not copy Apple’s I-Pad designs in building its Samsung Galaxy tab. Also that apple has to publicise that the…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Legal Writing
    • 5304 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Legal Writing

    Attorneys and Law Firms *576 **697 Heidel, Samberson, Gallini & Williams, Jerry L. Williams, Lovington, for defendant-appellant. Gary J. Martone, J. Richard Baumgartner, Joseph Goldberg, Albuquerque, for plaintiff-appellee.…

    • 5304 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trade Secrets
    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Trade Secrets

    This report is related to confidentiality argument for the protection of trade secrets. The report investigates the conflict between Samsung and LG. Samsung claims that LG stole its display technology and blame its own Samsung employees. Samsung accused eleven people, including six of its own employees of stealing its trade secrets and it claims that LG has stole its display technology.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Real World Ethics What to Do
    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Real World Ethics What to Do

    The purpose of this study is to expand the boundaries of our knowledge by exploring some relevant facts and figures relating to Apple’s Ethical issues in China and South Korea. During this study well will look at some of Apple’s sucesses and challenges throughout Apple’s history and see how they affect the company’s ability to operate today.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Apple's Success, Service and Innovations
    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Apple's Success, Service and Innovations

    CASE: “The Success of the iPod and iPhone raises the licensing question for Apple…. Again”…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essays
    • 8857 Words
    • 36 Pages

    Essays

    Civil Appeal No. 244 of 2022(Arising out of SLP (Civ.) No. 3033 of 2022) With Special Reference No. 1 of 2022…

    • 8857 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    G.R. No. 171053
    • 3998 Words
    • 16 Pages

    G.R. No. 171053

    Respondent IN-N-OUT Burger, Inc., a foreign corporation organized under the laws of California, U.S.A., and not doing business in the Philippines, filed before the Bureau of Legal Affairs of the IPO (BLA-IPO), an administrative complaint against petitioners Sehwani, Inc. and Benita’s Frites, Inc. for violation of intellectual property rights, attorney’s fees and damages with prayer for the issuance of a restraining order or writ of preliminary injunction.4…

    • 3998 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics