Preview

Appeasement In France And Britain In The 1930's

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Appeasement In France And Britain In The 1930's
Appeasement was the name of a group of British and (in part) French policies in the years leading up to World War 2, with their intentions being to avert war. This was to be succeeded through making concessions to Germany, Italy and Japan in the years leading up to WWII. Such matters generally were of fair (if not crucial) interest to those making the concessions. Although it is often spoken of pejoratively, appeasement did have roots both in traditional diplomatic practice and in the particular diplomatic circumstances of 1930s Europe. Although it is often described as a tactic used to buy time for rearmament by its creator Neville Chamberlain, more commonly and accurately appeasement is understood as an easy, negotiable “end”. In order to be able to make progress, countries must be willing to concede- there have been very few successes through pushing an issue to its limits, and even those would have come …show more content…
Due to the sheer amount of money being paid for reparations and the vast numbers of bygone troops, Chamberlain did not feel as though Britain or France were mentally or physically prepared for anymore cataclysm, and therefore the policy of appeasement was adopted in order to present the allies with time in which it would be possible to build back up their economy and “esprit de corps”, and rearm. The “Great War” may have been won by the allies, but there is no doubt that the harrowing events each and every country involved had to go through led to all leaders coveting the aversion of conflict at all costs, until Hitler’s needs had been fulfilled or they were confident in their ability to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ‘Britain’s attempts to appease Mussolini in the 1930’s were successful’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. (24 marks)…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within two years of consolidating power over Germany, Hitler and the Nazi Party had commenced operations to reverse the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles which had treated the German people in an unfair manner. Among these reversals included foreign diplomatic measures which would ensure that Germany would annex the territories it had lost at the conclusion of World War One. In September of 1938, with Europe on the brink of yet another major war, Great Britain’s Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain called the four powers – Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain – to convene in Munich and address German aggression against Czechoslovakia and the Sudetenland. Among Neville Chamberlain’s goals for the conference was the notion to avoid…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another result of appeasement was Hitler gaining the support he needed as time passed. Lastly, Germany took control of Austria. The Holocaust and many other events could have been avoided if the world leaders did not choose to give in to the demands of Hitler. Even though the world leaders thought they were doing the right thing to protect their nation by standing by and doing nothing as Hitler went forth with his plans, they were actually hurting their countries even more because by choosing to appease Hitler, they allowed him to do things that would change the world…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early 1920s, as World War I ended, nations looked for peace as an outlet and hope for the future. As time passed, most countries were happy that the Great War had ended, however they were upset with the outcome. Since there were many costly expenses from the war, it caused many of the hostile nations to look for strong rulers for change. This allowed many harsh dictators to rise to power. These dictators were aggressive rulers and took forceful actions. In order to combat these aggressive rulers, other nations tried to resist war and give in to their demands. This type of action was known as appeasement. Not all countries felt the same way about this response; other countries believed that a collective security would work better.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world was plunged into World War II in 1939 for many reasons. There were reasons such as Japan invading Manchuria, Mussolini's attack on Ethiopia, and when Hitler defies The Versailles Treaty. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to WWII. It basically just postponed the War from happening. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries no where and didn't benefit them in the least.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Wwii Begin?

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As for France and Great Britain, not wanting to repeat the huge losses they experienced in World War I, they decided not to attempt stopping Hitler from taking over Czechoslovakia and Austria. After Germany realized what they could get done, September 1, 1939, they decided to go ahead and take over Poland as well. After France and Great Britain saw that Hitler/Germany wasn't going to stop after that, they gave Germany the option of war.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1930s, lots of politicians in both Britain and France came to see that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles had placed restrictions on Germany that were unfair. Hitler's actions were seen as understandable and justifiable.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The First World War ended in an Allied victory, but the economies of Britain and France were shattered. In order to rebuild their economies, they had to disarm rapidly. The First World War had also given rise to strong anti-war sentiments, especially in Britain and France. Germany, who was blamed entirely for the outbreak of the First World War, received harsh reparations and was forced to sign the unfair Treaty of Versailles, which made Germany lose territory, as well as limited her armaments. This sparked resentment in the Germans who felt injustice that the war was entirely blamed on them which was prominently evident in Adolf Hitler who rose to power as Fuhrer of Germany in 1933. The highly nationalistic Nazi leader came into power a goal: to make secure and to preserve the racial community and to enlarge it. He hated the Versailles settlement and wanted to destroy it, hence fore building up the army and recovering lost territories to preserve German race. Therefore the in contrast to the Allies, Germany under Adolf Hitler was aggressive and influenced by revisionism. In attempt to preserve peace and not start a war with Germany, Britain and France, the two great powers gave in to Germany instead of standing against the aggressive Hitler. Appeasement is a term often applied to the overly acquiescent foreign policy practiced by Neville Chamberlain when dealing with Hitler’s Nazi regime. However, instead of preserving peace that Britain and France desperately wanted, it ironically allowed Hitler who did not have concrete plans on how to achieve his goals, to exploit their weakness and used situations in his advantage, which then resulted in the Second World War. While some may agree to this stand, others argue that Hitler intended a major war right from the beginning as seen from his book Mein Kampf and later on…

    • 2372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We can even argue that the Second World War was a conflict that had merely continued from the unsettled disputes of the First World War. For example, Germany was clearly bitter from their defeat from the First World War and the ruthless settlements of the Treaty of Versailles. Because of the war, Germany was also crippled financially. In short, Germany was facing a social and political instability after the war. Although the conditions had improved under Gustav Stresemann’s leadership, the conditions further exacerbated from the Great Depression in 1929. As a result, Hitler was able to rise to power, particularly from his promises to curb unemployment and anti-Communist policies. During that point of time, the anti-Communists policies were highly appealing by capitalists alike, particularly because of Stalin’s purges and the harsh living conditions created by the Communist policies. Unsurprisingly, due to the increasing support for the Nazi party, the Weimar Republic collapsed and Hitler soon became the Fuhrer. With his given dictatorial powers in 1933, Hitler was then able to begin rearming Germany. Although France, Britain and many other countries opposed this, they were reluctant to prevent Germany from rearming itself. This is largely because they are sympathetic towards Germany’s plight and they appealed to Hitler’s anti-communist policies. Such reluctance can be seen in Britain’s policy of appeasement, the Anglo-German Naval…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeasement which was done by chamberlain was to satisfy Germany for preventing war. Actually, at that time, Germany was demanding many things which it lost through Treaty of Versaille. Chamberlain who was British prime minister thought Germany was too punished and had rights to return their prohibited things, and he also thought if he did appeasement, it will make Hitler who was the leader of Germany satisfy and war won't happen. So appeasement started. Nowadays, in general, people think Chamberlain was wrong and he shouldn't do appeasement. But it isn't true. Even if appeasement failed and war started, I think appeasement was good.…

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are endless accounts of the Great War. Different views from various angles of thought. Although it seems universal that most historians agree all the participants in Europe at the time expected a short war. Tensions were rising everywhere. Public statements from Empires relating to others as well as prior conflicts had already taken a toll on most nations’ collective psyche in Europe. This greatly affected how they would plan their future strategies in foreign policy, as well as war entry. The key theme among most of the region was that the eminent war would be necessary and swift. Winston Churchill was quoted as saying the fight would be a “cleansing thunderstorm” short and quick. How wrong he was. Having read Herwig’s work I find it to be obvious that Germany acted in aggression in the year 1914, as well as in the year’s preceding the start of the First World War, specifically Emperor Wilhelm II whose words from the War Counsel of 1912 were full of fire and brimstone towards Britain. What was not as explicitly pointed out, and seemed apparent, was the increasing dissolution or extinction of old world empires. I believe this evolution in Europe had much to do with the once powerful Habsburg Monarchy, who became the Austrian Hungry Empire, as well as the German Empire, both of whom didn’t realize they were breathing their last gasps of real breath. I contend that WWI was born of fear as much as aggression. Much like an aging boxer taking one last shot, hoping to regain the belt, but the new generation of fighter has already passed him by.…

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, another reason why I think that the Policy of Appeasement was the right thing do is because the Allies countries would need more time, should a war start again. Canada and much of the World has just come out of the Great Depression. Many countries had a lack of jobs, not a lot of money, and people in their own country was suffering. Also, World War 1 just ended only about 20 years back and so men in the army were scarce. Many men who had joined the army had died, or gotten injured. The countries would need more time to raise money, build an army, recruit men, make guns, and anything else needed for war. If the allies went to war at that point in time, without getting ready, they were guaranteed for a loss. The army generals of Britain even told Chamberlain, the Prime Minister of Britain is 1938 that “ If war with Germany has to come, it would be better to fight in six to twelve months…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1930s, many politicians in both Britain and France came to see that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles had placed restrictions on Germany that were unfair.28 Hitler’s actions were seen as understandable and justifiable.29 When Germany began rearming in 1934, many politicians felt that Germany had a right to re-arm in order to protect herself.30 It was also argued that a stronger Germany would prevent the spread of Communism to the west.31 In 1936, Hitler argued that because France had signed a new treaty with Russia, Germany was under threat from both countries and it was essential to German security that troops were stationed in the Rhineland.32 France was not strong enough to fight Germany without British help and Britain was not prepared to go to war at this point.33 Furthermore, many believed that since the Rhineland was a part of Germany it was reasonable that German troops should be stationed there.34 England pursued a determined effort to avoid war.35 They hoped that by meeting hitler's demands he would be satisfied and there wouldn't be any war.36 This played into Hitler's plans because he used every concession to prepare the stage for his next demand. 37 This caused the policy of appeasement backfired.38 It not only made Hitler bolder, but it also gave him time to build up his army.39 The failure of appeasement led to the final straw being drawn when Hitler invaded Poland on 1 September and Britain and France declared war on Germany two days…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 2 Dbq Essay

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II is the cruel, black scar that marks the back of the Twentieth century. After World War I the seeds of World War Two were planted through the unbearable burdens put on the German people from the infamous treaty of Versailles. With the rise of the notorious dictator Hitler, the German people were hungry for a new beginning. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to World War II. It basically just postponed the War from happening. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of the past war, World War I. Italy, Germany and Japan took action and no one was stopping them. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries nowhere…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays