Preview

Appeasement and World War II

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
667 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Appeasement and World War II
WWII and Appeasement Essay The Second World War was a culmination of conflicts in Europe, which many argue resulted from the First World War itself. After the Treaty of Versailles condemned Germany to a multitude of reparations that needed to be paid, the country’s people were in need of a strong leader, which they soon found in Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party. Hitler started as a mere war veteran but rose in ranks, eventually taking all power over Germany for himself. He started strengthening the army with plans to expand his empire, which he did, starting with the invasion of Czechoslovakia. If Britain and France had joined forces during this invasion, World War II would have likely still taken place. After all, its path had been set in motion by previous events and would probably have remained true to Hitler’s intentions regardless of any intervention. It all started when Britain and France started negotiating with Hitler on the matter of Czechoslovakia and whether its occupants should accept the new German rule of their land. The leader of the Nazi Party eventually convinced both Chamberlain and Daladier, representatives of England and France, respectively, that refusal to cooperate would result in certain war. With no other way out in sight, the two countries retreated, convincing the Czechs that submission was the only safe alternative. At the Munich Agreement, Britain and Germany signed a peace treaty, which resulted in Hitler’s occupation of what would soon be a dismantled Czechoslovakia. Chamberlain returned home, claiming to have secured “peace for our time”. Truthfully, he could not have been more mistaken. As time passed, Hitler continued to strengthen his army and gain more support from the people of Germany, which led to his increasing confidence in his desired expansion of the empire. On the first of September 1939, German forces under Hitler’s command invaded Poland. This event officially marked the beginning of the Second World War


Bibliography: BBC News. BBC, n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2013. . "Neville Chamberlin on "Appeasement" (1939)." Neville Chamberlin on "Appeasement" (1939). N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2013. . "World War II." History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2013. .
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Techniques Used In Arthur Neville Chamberlain's Speech
    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Techniques Used In Arthur Neville Chamberlain's Speech

    Arthur Neville Chamberlain was a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 - 1940. He signed the Munich Agreement in 1938. When Hitler continued his aggression on Poland, Chamberlain promised to defend Poland's independence, therefore Britain declared war on, and Chamberlain led Britain through the first eight months of World War II. “On the Nazi invasion of Poland” speech was announced hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. He died of cancer after six months of leaving the premiership and was replaced by Winston Churchill. This speech was announced to show the cruelty of the Nazi government and to stop the Germans aggression…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the View That Appeasement Was the Only Realistic Option for British Policy Towards Germany Between 1936 and 1938
    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Assess the View That Appeasement Was the Only Realistic Option for British Policy Towards Germany Between 1936 and 1938

    The erosion of Neville Chamberlain’s# reputation was brought about quickly as his policy of appeasement failed to prevent WW2. The Cato# collective branded him as a criminal in the ‘Guilty men’#. Churchill# further reinforced this view telling the commons “England has been offered a choice between war and shame. She has chosen shame, and will get war.”#. These more orthodox views starkly contrast the reactions of the public and media pre-war. Hailed as a hero “Most newspapers supported Chamberlain uncritically, and he received thousands of gifts, from a silver dinner service to many of his trademark umbrellas.”#, with newspapers such as the Stockholm Tidningen# suggesting he receive the Nobel peace prize, Strasbourg renaming her streets overnight and the Telegram# concluding "Your name will go down in history as a statesman who saved civilisation from destruction”#. Ultimately appeasement, “the reduction of tensions between two states by the methodical removal of the principal causes of conflict and disagreement between them, which might otherwise lead to war.”# may not have been the only realistic option, but it was certainly an option and it was taken forward. Used as a synonym for weakness and ‘giving in’ in today’s world, there are Historians who argue that Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement was weak and lead to WW2 such as L.B. Namier, while there are also historians, such as A.J.P Taylor, who argue it was the only realistic option for him, during the years 1936-38.…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    World War II: A Continuation Of The Great War
    • 520 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II: A Continuation Of The Great War

    World War II: A Continuation of The Great War When the Great War came to an end with the signing of an armistice in the fall of 1918, the European counterparts of the Allied forces sought only to punish the German Empire to the harshest degree. With their determination to substantially debilitate Germany, The Treaty of Versaille decimated its army to an almost humiliating number, decreased the size of Germany, and forced the empire to pay an insurmountable amount in reparations for damages from the war. Basically, The Treaty of Versaille pummeled the German military and economy, and left Germany boiling with discontent, and pursuing the revenge that would come in the second world war. The restraints placed on Germany would also create a vulnerable government that would give rise to the election of a totalitarian leader, poised for revenge.…

    • 520 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Asses the View That Appeasement Was the Only Realistic Option for Chamberlain in 1938
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Asses the View That Appeasement Was the Only Realistic Option for Chamberlain in 1938

    Churchill, a very strong opponent of appeasement, notoriously said “An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last”[1]. However it wasn’t till the late 1960s that official Government documents on the subject were publically released which created a new view on Chamberlain and appeasement and that it was the only realistic policy for Chamberlain and Britain to pursue.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    WWII - Allies, Axis Powers
    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages

    WWII - Allies, Axis Powers

    Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain of Great Britain tried to restore the calm and wanted to preserve peace at all cost. He believed that meeting Hitler's demands could prevent war. Sudetenland was given to Germany because Hitler promised he would have no more territorial demands. French Premier Edouard Daladier and Chamberlain hoped this would satisfy Hitler and prevent war. In 1939, Hitler broke the Munich agreement and seized the rest of Czechoslovakia.…

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Position Paper
    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nationalism Position Paper

    It is evident that throughout history many wars have occurred. One of the major ones would be the First and Second World Wars because it was damaging to all countries in the world. The Second World War in particular was caused by ultra-nationalistic views, where one believes that their country is superior to all other countries. Adolf Hitler a German leader was able to become the head of a political party where he renamed it to “Nazional Sozialismus Deutsche Arbeiters Partei” which is also known as the Nazi Party. With this party he was able to stir up many people into following him and following his ideals. Adolf Hitler was also able to convince the English and the French into giving him back Austria and Czechoslovakia which are two countries that they have lost because of the First World War. With these two countries Hitler began to believe that he was superior because he was able to gain these two countries easily. This led him into the invasion of Poland which triggered the beginning of the Second World War. Due to Adolf Hitler’s…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Could WWII have been Prevented?
    • 1499 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Could WWII have been Prevented?

    Hitler went straight to the big powers of Europe to get the go-ahead to take over different parts of neighboring countries which had contained large native German populations. On September 15th, 1938, Hitler demanded the cession to Germany of the Sudetenland, the mountainous northwestern border area for Czechoslovakia that was home to 3.5 million ethnic Germans, He expressed his strong willingness to risk "world war" to achieve his objective, the British, French, Germans, and Italians- hastily arranged conference at Munich, and they reached an agreement that essentially met most if not all of…

    • 1499 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Neville Chamberlain's Policy of Appeasement between 1937-1939
    • 5151 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Neville Chamberlain's Policy of Appeasement between 1937-1939

    The Orthodox view that Chamberlain’s policy was foolish and ill-informed came into the limelight during and immediately after the war started, as people could now see the failure of appeasement. From 1939-1960s criticism of appeasement became immense; historians argue that Chamberlain gave into Hitler’s demands far too easily and that he gave in out of fear and to avoid a war. Source A1 is from the book “Guilty Men” which refers to appeasement as "deliberate surrender of small nations in the face of Hitler's blatant bullying". Unlike Hitler, Chamberlain attempted to create peace from the very beginning, he said "We…

    • 5151 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Effects Of The Warsaw Ghetto
    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Are The Effects Of The Warsaw Ghetto

    On September 1, 1939, Poland was invaded by Germany. The Nazi leader of Germany, Adolf Hitler, tried to make the claim that this was a strictly defensive move on their part, even though all along his main goal for invading Poland was to gain more Lebensraum, or “living space” for the people of Germany. Hitler had a plan to colonize the territory and to enslave and eliminate those citizens that he considered to be inferior, specifically the Jews, to make room for his “racially superior” German citizens. On September 3, Britain and France, who had never believed Hitler’s claim of it being a defensive move, declared war on Germany. This was the beginning of World War II.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why Great Britain Followed a Policy of Appeasement Toward Germany in the 1930s?
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Why Great Britain Followed a Policy of Appeasement Toward Germany in the 1930s?

    The appeasement policy, which can be defined as a diplomatic policy that hopes of preventing war by making concessions to an aggressor, was displayed by Great Britain towards Germany in the preface to World War II. However, it proved to be a spectacular failure, because leaders of the countries that were being appeased were taking advantages of these policies and were building up their own power since other world leaders would not take any decisive action. Numerous factors consisting social, economical and political aspects formed the basis for the pursuing appeasement in the aftermath of World War I.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did The Influence Of Hitler's Munich Pact
    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Did The Influence Of Hitler's Munich Pact

    Additionally, everyone thought that Hitler wanted peace and nothing more than that because of the speeches that he gave to the public. Hitler true motives were started to show in the speeches that he delivered. At the start of 1937, he assured all Germans that Germany was running out of space because they were getting over populated and they needed to expand Germany. Acording to History.com “ On September 30, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, French Premier Edouard Daladier, and British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain signed the Munich Pact, which sealed the fate of Czechoslovakia, virtually handing it over to Germany in the name of peace.” The Munich Pact was signed because Hitler believed that most of the people in the border of Czechoslovakia are…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Appeasement Justified
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Was Appeasement Justified

    An argument for appeasement is that Germany deserved to have a better deal as The Treaty of Versailles, many British people thought, was too harsh. If Germany would have some of the clauses of the treaty rescinded, then maybe they will be happy and not cause a war. Moreover Britain had lost and reduced a lot of its army during and after WW1. This meant that even though Chamberlain didn’t like to avoid war at any cost, he soon realized that Germany had been rearming its army for quite a while. Consequently it would be ludicrous to go to war with such a small army, therefore in the mean time it was better to appease Hitler. Britain slowly started to rearm its army, each year investing more. Reasoning for this is that if you spend all your money too soon you may end up with outdated weapons, which are useless against a modern army. Also numerous people feared a second world war, as WW1 was very bad for the citizens on Great Britain, especially as it may be over a small country such as Czechoslovakia. Many people would do anything to avoid a war as bad as WW1, this is why it was sensible to appease, as the public opinion was against war. Additionally many wealthy people, and ordinary people, would lose their land, property and their money if a communist government took over the country. The majority thought that communism was much worse than Hitler, as Adolf was seen as a strong…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    British opposition to the policy of appeasement

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    British opposition to the policy of appeasement

    ‘British opposition to the policy of appeasing Germany increased between 1937 and 1939.’ To what extent do you agree with this opinion?…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    To What Extent Did G
    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To What Extent Did G

    Opposition during 1936, when appeasement was first seen as really taking the forefront of foreign policy, was small and weak. However it was by 1939 that the opposition had swelled gradually under opposition leaders such as Churchill to the point where there were only few people who truly believed that a long-lasting period of peace would arise from this idea of appeasing the enemy. Over this period of time, both public opinion and Parliamentary opinion would lean towards the opposing side, based a series of factors that had changed in this 3 year span of time. A poorly-prepped military and defense services, a lack of trustworthy allies, Hitler’s legitimate claims and a change in public opinion all contributed towards a shift in beliefs. Opposition to the policy of appeasing militaristic powers began to grow after Hitler took power in Germany and it became clear to many in Britain that he would carry out his expansionist aims.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was the appeasement policy an error?
    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was the appeasement policy an error?

    In the 1930s, Britain and France adopted the appeasement policy towards Germany. It was to give in to some of the demands of Hitler in the hope that they would be satisfied and not ask for more. The appeasement policy aimed to prevent another large-scale war like the World War I.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics