History
9/1/14
Reading Response Of all of the perspectives given to me, I believe that the apache tribe had the most reasonable and justified perspective. The apache only resorted to violence when they were avenging a tribe member that was murdered, or when they were trying to defend themselves, unlike the settlers,O’odham tribe, Mexican Americans, and U.S government who would kill simply because they didn’t like them. The apache tribe had to act the way they did because they were in an “eat or be eaten” situation. The government would raid entire villages murdering men, women, and children. So the apache acted out of revenge to avenge the family members who were all murdered. Even though the apache tribe would try to run away, the O’odham tribe, Mexican Americans, settlers, or United States government would find them and attack them before they could settle down and grow crops. As a result, this led to the apache tribe forced to raid other villages and camps for food and supplies that they aren’t able to get for themselves. In conclusion I believe the apache tribes actions were forced upon them, and justified. If they could have had it the way they wanted to they would have left the land they were currently at and set up a new village somewhere peacefully. However no matter where they went they still had to fight for their life or avenge the innocent deaths that had occurred. I believe the apache tribe was the biggest victim out of all the options. Of all of the perspectives I believe the worst one was that of the United States settlers. They wanted the apache tribe dead simply because they believed they were savages, dishonest, and insolent. The settlers were angry with the government’s policy that wanted to move Native Americans peacefully and wanted them all to be killed instead. The United States settlers blamed the apache for all of the problems when really they were the ones causing it. Instead of settling in places where no Native Americans lived they came directly to take the land from them that they already owned for generations. I believe the apache could have kept their land and signed a peace treaty from the beginning because they did not want any violence it was all brought upon them. In conclusion, I believe the Apache tribe had the best perspective because they only resorted to violence when they were attacked first, and they only went on raids because they couldn’t grow their own crops without getting attacked or vandalized. Secondly I believe the United States settlers had the worst perspective because they were coming onto peoples land and taking it simply because they thought they were the superior race and thought they were better. I believe the apache had to act out of desperation to survive and the setters were acting out of selfishness.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
they poisoned their food, cut the fetus out of pregnant woman, sold Apache children into…
- 1040 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Many Native Americans organized more violent or extremist movements. Eventually, these movements caught the attention of the government.…
- 426 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Divergent Indian Tribes, throughout North and South America, had been thriving and living for generations with a deep reverence for their God or Spirit, and living in symbiosis with the land. As the new settlers arrived, they introduced their own brand of social order, however, they failed to understand the impact their desire to conform or corral the native people would forever alter, and in some instances destroy, the lives of future generations of Indians. One of the most startling examples of this was the decimation of the Lakota Indians by the 7th Calvary at Wounded Knee, South Dakota in 1890. Their leader, Big Foot, certainly was feeling the hopelessness and frustration of his people living on the Cheyenne River Reservation having to rely on the handouts from corrupt government officials for survival. It is likely, compelled by the desire to create a better existence for his people; Big Foot left the reservation in late December with approximately 300 of his people to meet Red Cloud, the Oglala Indian leader, at Pine Ridge. Previous to their ill- fated journey, their hopes had been temporarily inspired by Sitting Bull’s Ghost Dance; the Lakota Indians would dance tirelessly and endlessly whereby hoping to restore their nation’s personal freedoms and way of life prior to the intrusion of the white settlers on their lands. Unfortunately, their efforts would prove unsuccessful and succeeded only in producing further doubts by the white settlers and, likely, the justification for the actions of the 7th Calvary soldiers at Wounded Knee when the Lakota would be summarily executed even as they stood…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“To own the Earth, There is no word for this in the Sioux Language.” The Battle of Wounded Knee was the last battle of the American Indian Wars it was also one of the most gruesome battles that either side had seen. An estimated three hundred Indians lay dead while the US army had lost twenty five and thirty nine were wounded some of who would die later. This was one of the worst acts that the Americans have ever done to the Native Americans. One Native American stated later “it was as if the soldiers were crazed by the sight of blood and had appeared wild eyed as they shot again and again into some of the bodies.” Many Native Americans still hold grudges to this day over what happened to their ancestors on that sacred piece of land this is their story. This monumental battle took place in the winter of 1890 it would forever change the course of history and the lives of many Native Americans all across the mid-west.…
- 1756 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Sand Creek Massacre was a horrifying catastrophe that occurred on November 29, 1864 about forty two miles away from Fort Lyon Colorado. The Native American Indians were attacked in their peaceful village by 7 hundred men of the Colorado Territory militia, who were lead by Colonel John M. Chivington. It became one of the most abominable Indian wars. A few years before the massacre it was believed that the Indians could cause us harm however, that wasn’t the situation and it is now reflected over how the United States mistreated both Arapaho and Cheyenne Indian tribes.…
- 509 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
the natives, and it went against all governmental beliefs and what the U.S. stood for. It is…
- 672 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
May 28, 1830 The Indian removal act was passed. “It is generally acknowledged that this act spelled the end of Indian Rights to live in those states under their own traditional laws” (http://www.historynet.com) The Native American was forcefully removed from their Ancestral land and placed on federal territory west of the Mississippi. This was all done under the order of President Andrew Jackson. The reason for removal was no more than pure greed. The process in which the Native American was removed from their land was so heinous that it resulted in nearly 4000 (Unofficial) deaths of the Native American.…
- 753 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Native Americans were treated horribly, when they trusted the Americans. The U.S., stole their horses and many died from diseases. This information was gotten from the article called “Allow the Cherokee to Stay,” it stated “Their horses were stolen and hundreds died from disease and malnutrition on the journey.” This quote means that they agreed to move nicely and calmly, but the U.S., still did not treat them fair. That’s not all, when one tribe called the Lakota Nation agreed to move westward because there would be food, water, and land. The U.S., tricked them and they went to imprisonment camps. This was in the article called “ The Betrayal of Native Americans”, it said, “Instead, many Lakota live on reservations (or prisoner of war camps, as they might be called) like Pine Ridge, which is annually one of the most impoverished places in the United States.” This states that Native Americans agree to move where it would be better, but the U.S. still treated them horribly. It was not only the U.S., it was also Canda. The Canadians agreed to help the native groups with money because the U.S. and Canada were the richest nations back then. Instead, the Canadians poisoned their water, soil, and air. Some of the native groups were from the first nations. They were the Inuit, Métis tribe, and others . This was in the article called, “The Betrayal of Native Americans”. The quote stated, “Instead of honoring its…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
*the aftermath-The Sand Creek Massacre resulted in a heavy loss of life, mostly among Cheyenne and Arapaho women and children. Hardest hit by the massacre were the Wutapai, Black Kettle's band. Perhaps half of the Hevhaitaniu were lost, including the chiefs Yellow Wolf and Big Man. The Oivimana led by War Bonnet, lost about half their number. There were heavy losses to the Hisiometanio (Ridge Men) under White Antelope. Chief One Eye was also killed, along with many of his band. The Suhtai clan and the Heviqxnipahis clan under chief Sand Hill experienced relatively few losses. The Dog Soldiers and the Masikota, who by that time had allied, were not present at Sand Creek.[32] Of about ten lodges of Arapaho under Chief Left Hand, representing about fifty or sixty people, only a handful escaped with their lives.And it was deemed the worst massacre because it killed mostly wemon and children.…
- 427 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Chief Joseph gave a very concerned speech on a trip to Washington in 1879. Analyzing Chief Joseph’s speech, proves the point that Native Americans were not being treated equally by any means. In the event that you read the speech aloud you can hear the sorrowfulness and worrisome and extreme concern Chief Joseph has regarding his people. During the migration the Native Americans were a part of a process called forced assimilation which basically made them move to different areas. At this point the Native Americans were furious because they were poor and most of the time on the verge of starving. Considering what the Native Americans were put through they made the decision to attack the migrating Americans. Of course these actions led to casualties and not just Native Americans. In fact there were 70-90 casualties in the Battle of the Big Hole which primarily effected the Nez Percé tribe. Unfortunately, Chief Joseph said “If I cannot go to my own home, let me have a home in a country where my people will not die so fast.” He also adds, “Whenever the white man treats the Indian as they treat each other then we shall have no more wars.” Chief Joseph is just emphasizing the fact that once the Native Americans are treated equally there will be no more violence. Finally in 1885, the Nez percé were allowed to return to the pacific northwest. However, Chief Joseph did not go to the Nez percé reservation instead Joseph settled at the…
- 617 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Indians life was dramatically changed. They could no longer live a peaceful life on the plains as had been their way, but were forced to change to the ways of the white man or face punishment or even death.…
- 332 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When I think back of the stories that I have heard about how the Native American Indians were driven from their land and forced to live on the reservations one particular event comes to my mind. That event is the Battle of the Little Big Horn. It is one of the few times that the Oglala Sioux made history with them being the ones who left the battlefield as winners. When stories are told, or when the media dares to tamper with history, it is usually the American Indians who are looked upon as the bad guys. They are portrayed as savages who spent their time raiding wagon trains and scalping the white settlers just for fun. The media has lead us to believe that the American government was forced to take the land from these savage Indians. We should put the blame where it belongs, on the U.S. Government who lied, cheated, and stole from the Oglala forcing Crazy Horse, the great war chief, and many other leaders to surrender their nation in order to save the lives of their people.<br><br>In the nineteenth century the most dominant nation in the western plains was the Sioux Nation. This nation was divided into seven tribes: Oglala's, Brule', Minneconjou, Hunkpapa, No Bow, Two Kettle, and the Blackfoot. Of these tribes they had different band. The Hunkpatila was one band of the Oglala's (Guttmacher 12). One of the greatest war chiefs of all times came from this band. His name was Crazy Horse.<br><br>Crazy Horse was not given this name, on his birth date in the fall of 1841. He was born of his father, Crazy Horse an Oglala holy man, and his mother a sister of a Brule' warrior, Spotted Tail. As the boy grew older his hair was wavy so his people gave him the nickname of Curly (Guttmacher 23). He was to go by Curly until the summer of 1858, after a battle with the Arapaho's. Curly's brave charged against the Arapaho's led his father to give Curly the name Crazy Horse. This was the name of his father and of many fathers before him (Guttmacher 47).<br><br>In the 1850's, the…
- 2851 Words
- 12 Pages
Good Essays -
other tribes under their control, and when they refused, they would kill them, but worst of all…
- 1442 Words
- 2 Pages
Better Essays -
“Alarmed by the Ghost Dance Influence on Sioux reservations, Indian Bureau agents requested military assistance”(Infobase Learning). Their values and beliefs included practicing the Ghost Dance and not following the ways of the normal white man. When the government saw that this was happening they immediately sent over troops. “ On December 15, 1890, reservation police tried to arrest Sitting Bull who they believed was a Ghost Dancer, and ended up killing him , increasing the tension ,and anger at Pine Ridge” (Wounded Knee, History.com). The police were sent to do the job of arresting the leaders and instead they got the wrong guy ,and killed him. Arresting the Indian leader was bad enough because they had no reason to and instead he ended up dead. Even if this was on accident they still have a right to be angry. There was a battle between the two sides before this and the United States lost. At the time the Indian people were not doing anything that went directly towards the United States government or soldiers in a bad way. This was not fair because they simply took advantage over them like they were nothing and did not have the right for their own values and beliefs. They were sent there to decrease tension for themselves and the outcome was increasing the tension for the…
- 927 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When the settlers arrived they were shocked to see natives on a land they planned to call their own. The explorers refused to adapt to the natives way of living it almost seemed as they wanted to be in control of everything around them including the way children were taught what languages would be spoken and in what god they grew up believing in. the settlers were more about business and the native was all about being one with the land and living off the earth beautiful creation. The Natives adapted to the settlers beliefs and way of living but they would use their own symbols.…
- 191 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays