Preview

Ap Us History Court Cases

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ap Us History Court Cases
Marbury v. Madison (1803, Marshall). The court established its role as the arbiter of the constitutionality of federal laws, the principle is known as judicial review
Fletcher v. Peck (1810, Marshall). The decision stems from the Yazoo land cases, 1803, and upholds the sanctity of contracts.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819, Marshall). The Court ruled that states cannot tax the federal government, i.e. the Bank of the United States; the phrase "the power to tax is the power to destroy"; confirmed the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States.
Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819, Marshall). New Hampshire had attempted to take over Dartmouth College by revising its colonial charter. The Court ruled that the charter was protected under the contract clause of the U. S. Constitution; upholds the sanctity of contracts.
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824, Marshall). Clarified the commerce clause and affirmed Congressional power over interstate commerce.
Johnson v. McIntosh (1823, Marshall). Established that Indian tribes had rights to tribal lands that preceded all other American law; only the federal government could take land from the tribes.
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831, Marshall). "The conditions of the Indians in relation to the United States is perhaps unlike that of any two people in existence," Chief Justice John Marshall wrote, "their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian. . .(they were a) domestic dependent nation." Established a "trust relationship" with the tribes directly under federal authority.
Worcester v. Georgia (1832, Marshall). Established tribal autonomy within their boundaries, i.e. the tribes were "distinct political communities, having territorial boundaries within which their authority is exclusive."
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837, Taney). The interests of the community are more important than the interests of business; the supremacy of society’s interest over private interest.
Commonwealth v.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    McColloch vs. Maryland was a decision constructed by The Supreme Court of the United States. Maryland undertook disrupting an operation of one of the Second Bank of the United States’ branches by striking a tax on all of the banks not authorized by Maryland. The law was identified by the court that Maryland had focused on the United States Bank. The court then allowed the Federal government to pass laws not intended to be for the Constitution’s list of expressed powers. The case that I am referring to as of right now authorized two significant principles in constitutional law. Initially, the constitution stipends implied powers to congress inclining to construct a utilitarian functional government. However, state action could likely…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hodel Vs Irving Summary

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages

    3. Hodel v. Irving - (1987) Indian land was being divided under an allotment policy and fractional ownership developed. People were owning 1/100th of a parcel of land and rental income bookkeeping was expensive. So congress said anyone who’d inherit less than 2% or income and less than $100 a year lost his inheritance and it escheated to the tribe. Irving sued because it was taking his property right to give it to his…

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the case: The charter was to Dartmouth College by the King of England in 1769 and had specific purposes for its establishment. In 1816, New Hampshire’s state legislature passed a law changing the school from a private school to a public school. The school argued that the state did not have the right to do…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Argued: The charter was a contract protected by the same doctrine that the court already upheld in Fletcher v. Peck.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    3. In this trial, the Supreme Court decided that the federal government had ultimate authority in regulating interstate commerce, and that all state commerce laws had to comply with the Federal commerce laws.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison:(1803) Judicial review In 1801, Justice William Marbury was to have received a commission from President Adams, but Secretary of State James Madison refused to issue the commission. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was the basis for Marbury's claim, conflicted with Article III of the Constitution. Marbury did not receive the commission. This case determined that the Supreme Court and not the states would have the ultimate word on whether an issue was in violation of the Constitution. The ruling, based on judicial review, made the Judicial Branch equal to the other two branches of government.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case of Muller vs. Oregon was a landmark court case that took place in 1908. The major issue…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court only wanted what was best for society during this time. The majority ruling of the case…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plessy v. Ferguson. This case upheld the rights of states to pass laws allowing or even…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision, in 1859, sided with federal law stating that states do not have the ability to overrule federal law; that the Constitution was written as the supreme law of the land. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney’s decision denied the right of state’s courts to interfere in federal cases, prohibited states from releasing federal prisoners on a writ of habeas corpus, and upheld constitutionality of the Fugitive Slave Act.3 Taney cited in his decision, “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper to carry into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.”4 This is important because it limited the rights of the state governments. Taney’s decision strengthened the federal government and weakened the state governments. His decision also strengthened the judicial branch further following in the footsteps of John…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It goes back to the election of 1800, when Thomas Jefferson of democrat republicans beat the federalists of John Adams. One of the most historic U.S supreme court cases to begin to emerge and develop an a effect on U.S history today was the case of William Marbury, v. James Madison. Explaining the origins and background of the case, I will discuss the major constitutional issues it raised while outlining the major points of the courts decision and the significance of the decision.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison (1803) changed the role of the Supreme Court forever. The case started as a conflict of delivering court commissions, but ended as a precedent for the Supreme Court. During the case Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789—authorizing the Supreme Court to issue writs to government officials—was unconstitutional. This began the practice declaring laws that…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case Worcester vs. Georgia. Cherokee Indians fought for their right to control their land which was roughly ¼ the size of Georgia. “We have a perfect and original right to remain in our lands without interruption or molestation.” (Document B) Georgia fought to have them removed saying that they were uncivilized and couldn’t assimilate into American culture, and that they made a contract with tribe leaders. In the case the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Worcester and the Cherokees. John Marshall said “The Cherokee Indians have an unquestionable right to their territory until title should be extinguished by voluntary cession to the United States” (Document B). Jackson disregarded this ruling and had the Indian Removal Act of 1830 put in place where he forced the Indians west of the Mississippi River along what is now known as “The Trail of…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marshall Trilogy

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Marshall was fourth Chief Justice in Supreme Court and accredited as being the most influential man in the development of the United States legal system and federal Indian law. The Marshall Court made three significant decisions that directly balanced the power of the Federal Laws and Indian Federal Law. Amongst these resolutions are the three cases that form the simple outline of federal Indian law in the United States, this has been referred to as the ‘Marshall Trilogy.’…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United Stated. (2005). CHEROKEE NATION v. STATE OF GA., 30 U.S. 1 (1831) ( 42). Retrieved December 16, 2005, from Findlaw: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=30&page=1…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays