Preview

Ap Euro Late 19th Century Important Figures

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
708 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ap Euro Late 19th Century Important Figures
Important Nineteenth Century Guys Charts
Note: Legacies are gone into detail in the charts
Tsar Alexander II Positives | Negatives | * Introduced emancipation edict, gave the right to peasants to own land, marry their own choice, bring suits to court. * Peasants were given their own land. * Zemstvos (local assemblies) were put in place by Alexander, they could levy taxes and took charge over matters of education, famine, public projects * Local and provincial courts were made. * Introduced a judicial code that affirmed the principle of equality before the law. | * The land given to the peasants was not of good quality, the peasants also had to pay the state long term installments. The peasants were also responsible to the village commune that forced them to pay their installments and not be free of the land. * The local assemblies couldn’t attain much because of the interruption of bureaucrats afraid that it would turn into a self –government. * Alexander’s reform policies led to increasing reform movements that led to a populist group assassinating him, making his son turn against any reform and go back to repression. His reform policies also set the foundation for the fall of Russia’s Monarchy in 1917. |

Albert Dreyfus Positives | Negatives | * One of the first Jews in France to gain a high ranking position in the military. * Proved anti-sematic views wrong, could have possibly created a bigger window of opportunity for future people of Jewish decent. * Caused a major debate on anti-Semitism, more awareness and better reputation for Jews was gained after Dreyfus was pardoned and given the promotion of Major and also granted the status of a Knight of the Legion on Honour. | * Accused of leaking artillery information, Dreyfus was imprisoned but later pardoned. Fanned the flame of anti-sematic views. * "The government of the Republic has given me back my freedom. It is nothing for me without my honor."- the Dreyfus

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states that the Major “leads them all, hypnotizes them, for he is also interested in spiritism, occultism, he talks with spirits….. The traps he laid, seem incredible; the mad investigations, the monstrous hoax, a whole harrowing dementia” (Zola and his Time Pg. 438). What he is saying, is that the Major has manipulated the facts as well as the people involved in the case to make it look like Dreyfus is guilty. This led to the ministry going back at Zola and his accomplices for the statements he had made. The government brought Zola to trial on February 7th 1898, where thousands gathered to watch. Zola was eventually found guilty and was granted the maximum sentence under the law, which consisted of one year imprisonment, and a 3,000 francs…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reform that Alexander lll didn’t reverse was the freedom of the serfs. Alexander ll emancipated the serfs during his reign in 1861, he did this so Russia’s economy can grow, and become more like a western country. Serfdom needed to ended for Russia’s economy to grow, because it prevented the growth of Russian industry, obstructed the free flow of labour and it restricted enterprise. With Serfdom in Russia, the economy couldn’t develop, so it was stuck in a LEDCs economy, with agriculture being the main part of its economy. Alexander lll didn’t reverse this reform, because he also wanted Russia’s economy to grow like his predecessor Alexander ll.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The policies of Russia that Alexander II had refused to acknowledge, or even strived to end, were revisited by the new Tsar and people felt as though he was fairer and had ears to hear the voices of his people. They felt as though the new Alexander was more involved with the welfare of his people and so Opposition to his reign was reduced, as the people who had previously been ignored, were now listened to and their opinions met with acknowledgement.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    work in the 18th century. Along with expansion and enforcement of tsarist primacy, the early tsars…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the death of Nicolas I, the Tsar’s heir, Alexander II, rose to power in 1855 and led Russia to an era of changes. Considering the difficulties he inherited, Alexander II should be praised and not criticised for his social, judiciary, and military reforms as he successfully abolished serfdom overnight, implemented a more modern judiciary system, and enhanced the military system.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * 1943 Joined a French resistance called the “Combat” who opposed the Nazis. Had an underground newspaper; Camus became the editor, under the name “Beauchard,” criticized French collaboration with the Nazis…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsar Alexander’s reign (1881-1894) has been known as a period of extreme repression. He turned his back on reform all together and instituted a series of predictable repressive measures that collectively known as “The Reaction”. There were numerous reactionary policies brought in by the new and unexpected Tsar, one of which was known as Russification. This particular policy was brought in in 1881 at the very beginning of the Tsar’s reign, it has three main aims: repression of opponents; undoing the liberal reforms of his father and restoring Russia’s position internationally alongside her national identity which he believed had been diluted in the nineteenth century. As well as pacification of minorities.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economically, Russia was struggling with problems in agricultural production, expertise in jobs and basic infrastructure such as transport links. In hindsight, his economical reforms proved to be the most successful. Most successful of his reforms includes the introduction of Reutern. He was extremely successful as he was able to borrow less money from other countries giving more independency; He also allowed infrastructure to improve through the construction of railways across the landscape of Russia. This is extremely significant as it meant more raw materials could be travelled making Russia more economically stable and less reliable on other countries resources. Moreover, it encouraged more highly skilled and better qualified workers to move to Russia to design and created jobs for those to build the railway in turn leading to faster industrialising and economic prosperity. Other reforms included a treasury being reformed as well as the abolition of tax farming. Reformation of the government and treasury is important as it meant the government was more efficient with its budgeting and therefore saved money reducing their debt and consequently boosting the Russian economy. However not all of Alexander reforms were successful. Most controversial was the emancipation of the serfs in 1861 which has both benefits and drawbacks. It created a more mobile workforce allowing serfs to travel and become better qualified as well as pay taxes so…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The peasants made up the bulk of Russia’s population, of whom Tsar Nicholas II had little understanding of. The peasants were severely poor and in debt from the mortgages they were forced to take out after their emancipation in 1861. One of the peasant’s main motives behind their involvement in the 1905 revolution was fear that the government would repossess their homes, as they had fallen behind on their mortgage repayments during economic decline. The peasants wanted reform, and were fed up with paying fees to their landlords etc. These circumstances shaped the majority’s opinions of the tsar and his government, who believed that the tsar was incompetent. However, these views had been held for a long time. The peasants became more dissatisfied with the state as policies were set up in order to speed up Russia’s modernisation.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was a very influential person in history. Napoleon is sometimes considered a tyrannical dictator, but in reality he furthered the ideals of the French revolution and was a much better alternative to the "Reign of Terror". Napoleon did many great things, including establishing civil equality, giving liberties to the people, and making the government of France productive by uniting the people.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays