Preview

Ap Euro French Nobility

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
600 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ap Euro French Nobility
Document Based Question

During the late sixteenth century to the late eighteenth century, the concepts of French Nobles changed drastically. The impression of the nobles changed from the view that all nobility were servants and had a blind loyalty to the king in late 1500s, to the Nobles going against the law in the early 1600s. Then, in the mid to late 1600s, the perception changed again to questioning what were the nobility really for. Finally, in the late 18th century, the noblemen were seen as no use to society.

In the late 1500s nobility was widely known as a rank of honour. To be a noble at that period of time you had to serve the king relentlessly. Jean de la Taille explains this in his poem “The Retired Courtier”, “As he serves the King, he must serve the King’s favourites, honour the hateful, Give gifts, hold banquets.” (Doc 1) Also at this time the nobility were regarded as gentlemen with being morally good and righteous. “There is no true Nobility except that which derives from virtue and morality.” (Doc 2.)

When it became the early 1600s the nobility became less and less involved on serving their king and became more involved in protecting their own reputation, through illegal means, such as, the nobility having duels. This unsettled the French King Louis XIII and he decided to denigrate the nobles participating in the activity through his Declaration on Duels and Affairs of Honour speech, “These crimes, which gravely offend God’s majesty are detestable sacrilege, destroy healthy men, violate natural law, plunge noble families into mourning.”(Doc. 6) One sword nobleman also condemned the nobility for turning corrupt, “There is no longer any reward or virtue, since all power now belongs to favours, alliances, kinship, and money.” (Doc. 4) These illegal acts in time created questions about the nobles in France.
Moving on to the mid 1600s with the nobility still participating in duels and moving away from the king, much of society began to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nobles had control over all other non-nobles within his territory, excluding clergy and merchants of a free town.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the time period of the late sixteenth century to the late eighteenth century the concept of what nobility is and what it was conceived to be varied greatly as more modern thoughts developed and desperation of monarchs grew to meet such demand. The arguments related to nobility differed greatly, but these were the most crucial; the difference between the sword and the robe and the right to even hold such a position at all.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Feudalism was the dominant social system in medieval times, in which hierarchies had absolute control over the peasants' lands.Villeins (peasants) were obligated to honor nobility by sharing the wage of production from their labors and assured military protection. In order to strength the feudalistic system, nobles implemented strict rules for villains could become in elite guild members. To become an elite member of the guilds a person had to go throughout three relevant phases that were apprentice, journeymen and master.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nobility were important in maintaining political stability as the Crown relied heavily on them for many different purposes,…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the medieval era, France had a feudal system of governance where the upper nobility siding with the kings controlled the lower classes. The social structure was fragmented into three unequal hierarchical groups consisting Kings, lords and peasants. The kings ruled the land and were believed to have been granted this right by God that they passed on through heredity. They incarnated the law and were the absolute monarchs. The Lords on the other hand hold fiefs that they rented to peasants in exchange of labor, fees and protection. The Lords consider themselves far more superior than the peasants or serfs and treated them unfairly as a result. Lastly the serfs, representing the vast majority of France population, approximately ninety percent, were the most neglected and most abused of all three classes.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nobles help top jobs in government, the army, the courts, and the Church. They were also exempt from paying taxes, though they resented the royal bureaucracy that employed middle-class men in positions that had once been reserved for them. Both rich and poor members of the Third Estate resented the privileges enjoyed by their social “betters.” Wealthy bourgeois families in the Third Estate could but political office and titles, but the best jobs were still reserved for nobles. Urban workers earned terrible wages.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The power of the Nobility was the most important cause of unrest in the period of 1450 to 1470. ‘How far…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I. First Industrial Revolution: The Industrial Revolution brought people new life during that period. Using new technology on production and bringing fresh air to society made the development of the world. Growing domestic and international markets, innovations were obviously positive influences in order to form a better world. (Cole, 454) The French Revolution transformed the political landscape of Europe and the economic transformation also began in Europe in the 1780s. In early 1700s, Britain changed from Autocracy to constitutional monarchy so capitalistic events and policies were implemented and became the foundation of the industrial revolution. Huge capital accumulated by bourgeoisies provided the monetary support for the revolution.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV famously declared, “I am the state,” and there is no question that he identified himself as the sole ruler of France. During the so-called Sun King’s absolute monarchy, the nobility had little or no role in or control over the French government. Instead, King Louis built the glamorous palace at Versailles and invited members of the nobility to live on the palace grounds. Most didn’t pay taxes and led an indulgent lifestyle but with no political influence. Most of King Louis’s reign was spent fighting foreign wars that also kept the nobles occupied as soldiers. The French nobility retained their status in high society under King Louis XIV but were never given the powerful political titles that were reserved for men of great intelligence.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dueling in France

    • 934 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Billacois arranges the book into four parts. Part one The sixteenth Century: Early stages of the French Duel, Billacois attempts to examine the origin of the non-judicial duel. Part two The Turn of the Sixteenth Century: Disputed Peak, he provides a comprehensive and clear description of all aspects of the duel at the turn of the sixteenth century. Third part After 1650: The Wane and Its Limits, in which he describes the decline of the duel and provides possible causes for it. Part four Towards a Definition of Themes he provides a catalogue of the themes that constitute the mindset established by the duel.…

    • 934 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nobles had had a history of standing in the way of French absolutism however, by manipulating them; Louis XIV was able to achieve immense feats. In one instance, Louis XIV achieved the active collaboration of the Nobility in Languedoc. He was able to convince the Nobles in Languedoc to support an elaborate canal project. In return for their support, he promised to increase taxes, which in turn, benefited the Nobles of Languedoc as well as royal support of local industries, which again appeared to benefit the nobles in that area. Also, they would suppress…

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becket, the Movie

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aside from being dishonorable, Becket was also a man of great honor. He was a humble servant who showed reverence to his king. In the movie Becket, Thomas says to the king that “Nobility lies in the man, my prince, not in the towel.” By saying this, Becket states that being noble is a characteristic of a person as a whole, and not of that person’s social status of clarification of profession. Becket honors his job in serving the king and makes clear of it by stating that being a noble is more than just a title to him, but it defines who he is as a person.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Sir Gawain a noble knight and what is it? Yes, Sir Gawain is consider a noble knight in the story of “Le morte d’ Arthur”. Nobility, in the story, is the quality of a noble character in mind, birth, dignity and decency. Sir Gawain follows the standards of nobility in the story of “ Le Morte d’ Arthur”.He is an important member of the round table. He never turns his back on the King Arthur. He never gives up on the fight with Sir Launcelot and he realizes what he has done wrong at the end of his life. Being a member of the round table, never turning his back on the King Arthur, never giving up, and realizing what he did wrong are all signs of a noble person.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The start of the French Revolution was directly in French society. Society was constantly dominated by nobles, or a social group that was primarily made up of: aristocrats, officeholders, professionals, merchants and businessmen. The French society was broken up into three social classes, or better known as “Estates.”. The First Estate was comprised of all the clergy; the Second Estate was comprised of the nobility, and the Third Estate was comprised of everyone else, including wealthy lawyers, businessmen, urban laborers and poor peasants. The Third Estate was by far the largest social class. All of these classes had one thing in common, and that was a want for an economy that would serve their interests. The nobility depended on a constant infusion of talent and economic power form the wealthy social groups represented in the Third Estate. Less prosperous lawyers were jealous of the privileged position very few had in their profession. Over the course of the century the price of offices rose, making it more difficult to buy one’s way into nobility, and creating tensions between middling members of the Third Estate and the very rich in trade and commerce who were the only group able to afford to climb the social ladder. Several fault lines ran through the elite and the middle classes which led to resentment of the government and a need for change.…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Old Regime

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Old Regime consisted of three elements and one of those elements was politics which was based on power and who or what ruled over a certain region. The 18th century was known as the great age of the aristocracy. The nobility had an approximately 1 to 5 percent of the entire population of any country that was given. Yet it was known that in every country the nobility was the single wealthiest sector of the population and had the widest degree of social, economic and political power; they also set the tone of polite society.1 “The British nobility was known as the smallest, wealthiest, best defined, and most socially responsible aristocracy resided in Great Britain.”2. The French nobility were known as “one of the sword” and “of the sword”.3 When it came to peasants it is told that most French peasants owned some land, but there were few serfs in eastern France. Also that nearly all French peasants were subject to certain feudal dues, they included the required use for payment of the lord’s mill to grind grain and his oven to bake bread.4 This basically means that many peasants in this time had no political right to run themselves and their lives especially because they had to pay taxes. Since they did not have any rights they would work for the King in order…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays