Throughout history, many powerful empires and dynasties have ruled. Some ruled for hundreds of years, while others lasted for shorter time periods. All of these ruling powers had a great impact on their country’s development. The way they governed their people and kept in power were often very different but they often achieved the same goals. The Han Dynasty, which ruled China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 C.E and the Roman Empire, which was in power from 31B.C.E. to 476 C.E., are two examples of this. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had many similarities such as public works and a strong government system, but they also had many differences like their forms of government and how slavery existed in their society.
There are many similarities between the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty. For example, both invested greatly in public work projects such as roadways and water treatments systems. The Romans were know for their major public works projects such as aqueduct systems, roads and bridges. The structure they used for their bridges is still to this day referred to as a “Roman Arch” design. The Han Dynasty also invested greatly in public work projects. Under the Han Dynasty, the Great Wall of China was finished. The Great Wall of China is still standing today. The Romans developed a complex aqueduct system and the Han Dynasty developed a complex system of canals. This emphasis on roads and other transportation systems help to unify the vast empires and reduce travel time within them. The strong government systems used by both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty help develop the regions into world powers. Both had strong armies that helped to defend their borders and grow their respective empires. Both controlled similar amounts of land. In the second century C.E., China controlled about 1.5 million square miles of territory and Rome controlled about 1.7 million square miles of territory. The cost of the strong military however, eventually helped lead to the downfall of each empire/dynasty. Both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a strong agricultural base. This base allowed them to trade with other areas, giving them a strong economical advantage and also allowed their population to grow.
While the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had many similarities, they also had many differences. For example Rome was established as a bureaucracy. The Han Dynasty always had an Emperor. Rome often allowed local areas to run themselves with little direction from Rome. The Han Dynasty did not tolerate local authority that did not follow everything that the Emperor said. As a result, Rome tolerated many different languages and cultures under its rule. This lead to a population that had many different beliefs and customs. The Han Dynasty did not tolerate these types of differences and made its population conform to the many of the same beliefs. The Han Dynasty was more unified and highly centralized than the Roman Empire. Rome also greatly relied on slavery to make their Empire run. Rome used slaves for road building, farming and many other activities that allowed Rome to stay in power. China also had slavery but depended on its peasant class for much of the work need for it’s agriculture society.
Though these famous eras changed society in many ways, both of these ruling powers fell. The Fall of the Roman Empire lead Europe into the Dark Ages and dynastys that followed the Han Dynasty never reached the power that the Han Dynasty once held. Though the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had many similarities and differences, both changed the world.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…
- 644 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Secondly, ancient Rome and Han China both shared political views. The political structures of both were based on very well organized bureaucratic systems with strong monarchy sets of succession. These were two of the most dominant empires of Ancient Europe and Asia. They arose from small states,but with lots of discipline and military toughness, took power over small and quarreling neighbors. However Rome's military was much more powerful in all criteria.…
- 492 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China vs. Imperial Rome Han China during the time 200 bce. through 200 ce. and Imperial Rome during the time of 31 bce. though 476 ce. had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities between the two are their religious policies, the significance of their armies, rebelliations from the people, and the role of the emperor. These empires had many differences as well such as the acceptance of outsiders, their influences on other regions, and their philosophies.…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Both civilizations had very strong central governments which allowed for powerful and expanding kingdoms. Both empires had to develop road systems for their expanding military. The Roman army men were experienced and privileged and held high ranks in their class system and played an important role, along with the senate, in choosing an emperor. The center power for the Roman empire was generally the senate. The ruler for the Han dynasty was hereditary. The Han dynasty's military wasn't as loyal. Most of the soldiers were newly drafted and didn't have much experience. China had two capital cities which served as seats of power for emperors and they were Louyang (located in the east) and Chang'an (located in the West). The merchant class in Han was restricted by the government unlike the middle class in Rome whom were free from government constraints which allowed economic mobility. The imperial model was only revived in China later but it never revived in Rome.…
- 778 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Chinese were more diplomatic and wanted to avoid conflict as much as possible. There mindset was to win battles without fighting. Instead of using military and legions to defend their borders. They used walls and diplomacy to get other enemies away from attacking their borders. The romans though were a very attack mentality kind of military. They were very organized and had a lot of legions. They would use the citizens to sign up for the military. This was also a way to keep political control by making them sign up for the military. They used the legions and the military to defend their borders. A similarity though is that they both used roads and waterways for military access and trade routes. They could move the military easier from place to place. They could collect taxes and control trade. And also they could govern more effectively with use of messengers due to the…
- 497 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Dynasty and The Roman Empire both were able to expand and develop their empires with their distinctive governing methods and control. To China, the centerpiece that supervised everything was knows as Confucianism. With all dependability focused on the emperor and society serving as a family unit, Han China's political system was known for a centralized, closed unit. It was ruled by an emperor who greatly observed the Mandate of Heaven. The Han developed a supply of soldiers, which kept their borders secured and made them capable to exchange with others from time to time. On the other hand, Rome had a centralized, blended structure. The main focus points of the Roman Society were operated by a Roman Republic, which was more like a monarchy, who controlled their complex structure. The Roman Society had more residents and rights than the Hans, Roman's political control lay in the hands of the wealthy, which then they were elected to a political seat. The governors were picked from family networks. The only way Romans could accomplish anything big in a certain time span was to make strong changes in their community. It was an enormous weight on Rome's resources and power, when they had to stress over big wins. For example, when there was barely any food to support the developing empire. The Romans and the Hans both had their wealthiest people control over their peasants, which caused a social distribution to each and every one, and could have leaded to outbreaks in little battles, wars between the communities, and what not. This was entirely not beneficial on each empire's part and especially their social interaction.…
- 808 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China was one of the longest dynasties in Chinese history, however, the Imperial Roman empire lasted even longer. Han China and Imperial Rome share many similarities as well as many differences. Although Han China and Imperial Rome had many similarities (patriarchy, expansion), the differences (recruitment, system of who is in authority) in methods of political control outweigh the similarities because of they had little interaction with each other.…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Before 600 CE China changes from Warring States to an empire during the period of Qin and Han dynasty in efforts to unifying and consolidating China. There were similarities in their bureaucracy in the means of enforcing authority and have contributed in innovations on technology, but there were differences in political philosophy.…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Although there are countless similarities and differences in techniques of imperial administration between Han China and imperial Rome, some differences are seen through their…
- 279 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Both Han China and Imperial Rome were controlled under one central leader. The leader of the Han Dynasty had the overall power, but set up administrative districts governed by officials. The emperor also used Confucianism as a means to train people to become educated bureaucrats, who would then enforce his policies. However, the ruler of Imperial Rome set up a monarchy, disguised as a Republic, so that he could maintain complete control over his citizens. This allowed the citizens to feel as if they were contributing to government, and also allow the emperor to maintain control over his empire. Both societies also created more centralized governments by developing vast expanses of roads to promote trade, as well as levying taxes to stimulate economic prosperity.…
- 419 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There were many similar political methods between Han China and Rome both had only ruler. Both empires were ruled under a tyranny. By being ruled over by one king it meant that whatever the emperor says goes. The citizens had less of a choice. Secondly, both empires’ kings trusted the higher social class to give them advice. For example, the Han China emperors would listen to the eunuchs and scholars for advice while the Roman emperors listen to the aristocracy. Having the emperors’ trust gave them the power and they can take advantage by making laws that benefits them. Another similarity is how they both passed on their power to their heirs. From father to son they would pass on their titles as emperor. They wouldn’t pass on their title and let another family take power willingly.…
- 461 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Han China and Imperial Rome both had well developed cities and roadways that made life easier for their citizens as well as provided cultural unity. The Roman and Han roads allowed for the easy movement of troops to respond to outside threats and facilitated trade and commerce. This system of roadways not only connected the empires but promoted the spread of ideas, like Christianity in the Roman Empire and Buddhism in China. Both empires were further linked by a network of cities that acted as a nerve system that helped to tie the empire together. The cities were centers of administration and customs emanated into the surrounding area fostering cultural diffusion even though only around twenty percent of the population lived in cities. The cities were managed by local officials from the middle class, the equites in Rome and the gentry in Han China, who were delegated a great deal of autonomy. Their duties were to make the government more effective and alert, and included…
- 957 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperial Han and Imperial Rome were two very important empires in Europe and Asia. Even though their time in ruling was different they both were very powerful in their time. The Imperial Rules of Rome and Han China had differences and similarities in the techniques of imperial administration such as different ways of religion, Confucianism and Christianity, similar social aspects because of patriarchy as well as economic similarities such as trade in the Silk Road.…
- 585 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire was built with a centralized government, which meant that the civilization relied on one emperor to rule the empire. The Han Dynasty also used a centralized government, they selected new emperors after one was done ruling. Both of these civilizations also shared a similar economy, which was based mainly on agriculture and trade. The Great Silk Road was a huge part of trade for both economies, it allowed the merchants and traders of the dynasty and empire to travel and trade goods with many different countries. During the Pax Sinica however, the Han Dynasty had very different…
- 692 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays