Preview

Ap American History - by: Alberto Alonso

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
937 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ap American History - by: Alberto Alonso
Alberto Alonso December 8, 2012
A.P. American History DBQ Essay #2
-------------------------------------------------
1. “The opponents of the annexation of Texas and the Mexican War attacked slavery as the root cause of expansion, but in fact it was no more important than other causes.” Assess the validity of this statement, using the documents and your knowledge of U.S. history from 1820-1860 to support your answer. During the early-mid part of the 19th century (mainly 1820-1860) Americans objected many things they didn’t like. Taxes, the government, even presidents were some of the rejections of the people. But the one thing the people did not like during this time period was the annexation of Texas and the Mexican War. “The opponents of the annexation of Texas and the Mexican War attacked slavery as the root cause for expansion.” However, slavery was not the only reason America sought for expansion. Other than slavery, people wanted to expand America because they believed in Manifest Destiny (an idea during the 19th century in which people believed that America should expand over the entirety of North America) or because they feared that Texas was an independent state, even the Gold Rush in California (1848-1855) contributed to the expansion of America. Even though “the opponents of the annexation of Texas and the Mexican War attacked slavery as the root cause of expansion” the idea of Manifest Destiny, fear, and the Gold Rush were other important causes for expansion. As you may know, slavery was the key reason as to why people wanted to expand America, especially southerners. Abolitionists (people who were against slavery) did not like the idea that the expansion of America was based on slavery, but it was. In Document B it states, “Texas…will strengthen ‘the peculiar institution’ of the South, and open a new and vast field for slavery.” Many southerners wanted Texas to be annexed to America because it would allow the south to have more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The territorial expansion from 1800 to 1850 did not unite the nation, but rather tore it apart. The concept of Manifest Destiny had most citizens believe that the territory of the United States should extend all the way to the Pacific Ocean. Through the expansion of territory the issue of slavery between the North and the South did not unite the nation but rather split it apart.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John O’Sullivan wrote the article “Annexation” in the United States Magazine and Democratic Review. This article was based in Washington, D.C. in 1845 during the 19th century of American Expansion. The document was primarily focused on whether or not the United States should annex the Republic of Texas (Sullivan, 1).…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Background essay is states “Congress reversed itself and voted to annex Texas” (Roden 317). Annexing a state means that a country wants to have another country but the other country has to agree therefore Texas is now a part of the United States. In Doc B it states “Texas was determined… to annex herself to our Union”. That quote shows that Texas wanted to become part of the United States. Also in Doc A it states “It is time for opposition to the Annexation of Texas to cease… Texas is now ours… Let their reception into the “family” be frank, kindly, and cheerful”. That quote meant that everyone (except for Mexico) was happy that Texas was now a part of America. This evidence shows the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because the United States wanted Texas, yet Texas did not want Mexico, it wanted to join the…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us Expansionism

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The two main ways of land gain for the United States was through expansionism and imperialism. These two means have several striking similarities between them. For instance, both of these policies led to conflicts. During expansionism, the main logic behind new statehood was to have the upper edge for free or slave states. Of course, this desire to gain as many free or slave states as possible led to such conflicts as Bleeding Kansas, where free and slave advocates flocked to Kansas in order to decide whether Kansas would allow or ban slavery. While the U.S. was imperializing, conflicts also took place rather frequently. In the Philippines, Emilio Aguinaldo led a two-year revolt against American forces in order to become free from American reign. Racism was also a key similarity between expansionism and imperialism. When Americans began to establish states as they moved westward, they had no consideration for Native Americans andconsidered them to be extremely invaluable. The exact same thing occurred about onehundred years later, with the “criminal aggression” that took place in the Philippines. TheAmerican Anti-Imperialist League argued that the blood of the Filipinos was onAmerican hands, and we more deeply resented this betrayal. Just about everybody whowas not a white, Anglo-Saxon protestant was discriminated against. The foreign policiesthat…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    America’s acquisition of the West took huge strides during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. A major move in American history towards this innuendo was the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, under Thomas Jefferson. It was a land deal between the United States and France, in which the United States acquired more than 800,000 square miles of land west of the Mississippi River. Another major factor was the result of the Mexican-American War in 1848, the Treaty of Guadalupe. It was a peace treaty that granted the United States with the territories of present day Nevada, Colorado, Utah, Arizona and most importantly California. These large acquisitions, combined with the ideas of Manifest Destiny and a growing population led to desire of Westward Expansion.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beatriz Figueroa

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. What were some of the fears of those who opposed the admission of Texas into the union?…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Historians have varying views on the need for expansion of slavery. Some say the land was becoming depleted and needed to be expanded while others say it was already profitable where it was and there was no need for expansion. Either way, the sides disagreed with each other and would lead to the Civil…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1800 to 1850 territorial expansion tore the United States apart. Territorial expansion itself was not a debated issue. Spurred by the concept of Manifest Destiny, almost everyone believed that America should extend from sea to shining sea and maybe even farther. But it was the issue of the expansion of slavery into the new territories that pitted the North against the South and split our nation apart.…

    • 781 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louisiana Purchase

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout American history, land, expansion, and the conquering of new territories has played an integral role in the development of economics, politics, and even led to bloody conflicts. When America first gained their independence on July 4, 1776, the nation consisted of only the 13 states that had recently separated themselves from Great Britain. Since then America has grown to 50 states, however this expansion came at a cost. American expansion had huge impacts on the development, and ultimate abolition of slavery, and changed other major parts of American culture in the process. Beginning as early as the Louisiana Purchase in 1806, issues over slavery and expansion seemed to go hand in hand up until slavery was officially abolished by…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Armistice of 1850

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Armistice of 1850 With the belief of their young country’s “manifest destiny”, and victory over Mexico in the Mexican-American War, the United States of America conquered most of the western portion of their continent. While obtaining large territories of land through victories from warfare and at the cost of bargained prices, this proud nation found itself with an immense crisis sitting within the palms of their hands. As the improvement of the United States came through territorial gains, their triumphant progress was met with digression. Although new territories were under the possession of the United States, many leaders of this powerful nation were unsure whether their newly acquired land was fit to be a territory of free soil or slavery. While many proposed arguments for pro-slavery land, many counter acted with free soil proposals and arguments. During the year of 1850, the United States of America managed to ease the tension between those at opposite spectrums of this confrontation through the Compromise of 1850.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, expansion was a common action for a country. The United States was growing at a considerable rate, making it was understandable to want to obtain more land. The issue how they went about obtaining it. Thomas Jefferson had two men, Lewis and Clark, travel west of the states to find a trade route and explore the land to see if the nation could expand. He, along with Andrew Jackson, showed that westward expansion is needed because the land helps support people by providing resources to allow them to survive. Yet people didn’t care for the land and instead would take advantage of it. The relationship between the American settlers and the land is that they exploit it for money. Since people don’t have a positive relationship with the land and get into conflicts over it, the topic has led to many conflicts that have continued to affect people for generations.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Having many settlers all over the territories supported them in gaining this. For example, by 1830 there were more than 20.000 Americans lived in Texas and they were opposing Mexicans government. “These settlers did not intend to become Mexican citizens. Instead, they planned to take over Texas.” (Out of Many, 245) Thus, it leaded to the war. Although Mexican-American war gained so many pros and contras, but it was clear that the government at that time did whatever it takes to complete their Manifest Destiny. It was the president James K.Polk from Democratic Party who was an expansionist. He was optimistic to make America stretched from the east until west coast. So, he sent his secret envoy, John Slidell to offer Mexico some money in order to buy their lands but Slidell was rejected. Angry Polk sent his army to the disputed zone making his soldiers involved in skirmish with Mexican soldiers. He lied that Mexico started it first and asked congress for war; “War exist, and, notwithstanding all our efforts to avoid it, exists by the act of Mexico herself. This claim of President Polk’s was of course contrary to fact.” (Out of Many, 247) It was clear that he wanted to expand America, although by war, because the beginning of the war was confusing, no one knows what the reality happened at the border that raised the war. Even Abraham Lincoln questioned Polk’s account of the border incident. (Out…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Annexation of Texas: A British Conspiracy The 19th century was a time of great expansion for the United States. With the purchase of Louisiana from the French, the US greatly expanded its land mass. Even though American territory now extended to the Rocky Mountains, Americans were far from content. This is how the idea of “Manifest Destiny” was established. Americans felt like it was their destiny to expand all the way to the Pacific Ocean. After Texas won its independence from Mexico, the US saw the perfect opportunity to continue its expansion. However, Britain, with its anti-slavery views, thought the annexation of Texas was another chance for the US to expand the slave trade. Britain already had ties to Mexico, due to Mexico’s financial troubles, thus making British interference with Texas’ annexation highly plausible. After looking at the evidence presented in “Discovering the American Past”, I believe that Britain was involved in a conspiracy. One with a preface of abolition but filled with the need for power, land, and money- a conspiracy to derail the US’ annexation of Texas. In the mid-19th century, slavery was dying down worldwide. However, the United States was one of the only countries still participating in slavery. On the other hand, Great Britain was a world power at the head of the abolitionist movement. This is where the main conflict arose between the two nations. Texas, if annexed would be added to the Union as a slave state. This was in direct conflict with Britain’s beliefs. Since British and Mexico already had strong ties- Mexico had abolished slavery as well- Britain officials felt like it was in both countries best interest to keep Texas independent. Effingham Wilson stated in “Texas. An English Question”, a British pamphlet, that the annexation of Texas into the Union would “strengthen the slavery interest in Congress” and directly oppose Britain’s plans for “total universal abolition”. According to Wilson, Texas’ annexation would slow…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Expansionism The 1840s and 1890s saw an expansion of American territory, as a result of several economic, political, and cultural factors. In both cases of American expansionism, the Americans believed that we must expand our borders in order to keep the country running upright. Also, the Americans believed that the United State, being one of the strongest of the nations, had a need to become even stronger. This is shown in the "manifest destiny" of the 1840's. Apart from the similarities, there were also several differences that included the American attempt to stretch their empire across the seas and into other parts of the world. Opponents of expansion in the 1840s did not oppose gaining new lands, but opposed the possible spread of slavery in the new territories. The opposition to expansion in the 1890s was based on concerns of controlling people far away of different cultures, but not opposed to the economic benefits. Throughout history, the United States had come off as a nation that would take what they wanted at any cost. This was prevalent in both cases of expansion as the Americans risked war and national safety for the sake of gaining land.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays