Preview

Antony And Cleopatra Power Play

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1210 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Antony And Cleopatra Power Play
Power play is featured in human experience at all levels, from the public world of politics to the private world of personal relationships. Textual portrayal of power as a complex social force, has intoxicated the human disposition encapsulating the composers vision of power play being destructive and self serving. Through Anthony and Cleopatra, Shakespeare demonstrates the interplay of political power among the triumvirate, intertwined with Cleopatra's sexual power play which controls Anthony as he gets transformed into a "strumpets fool", highlighting the manipulating nature of power play. Similarly in, Elizabeth (1998), Shekhar Kapur showcases, the triumphing rise of Elizabeth from her rotten beginnings to being one of England's most powerful monarchs, through use of various power play tactics. …show more content…
Octavious Caesar is portrayed as very powerful character through his deceive language, his clear identification of effective strategies and characterization of being someone who is capable of great ruthlessness. In order to fulfill his objectives Caesar establishes a power play stragedy which involves taking advantage of opponents weakness. This is evident when he tells Octavia "he has given his empire up to whore" which shows how he utilizes the personal to attack Antony's political power. Caesar's actions, imprisoning Lepidus and therefore depriving him of his power after "having made use of him in the wars" against Pompey, highlighting his duplicating façade as well as his dispassionate nature. Many of the men who are placed in the front line by Caesar are the very men who have previously deserted from Antony's ranks, accentuating the shifting balance of political power and emphasizing that one need's to exploit opportunities and weaknesses in others to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the assassination of Caesar, Brutus explains his reasons for committing such an act. Antony deceives Brutus into believing that Antony understood their reasons and would join them as an ally. By becoming a supposed ally, Antony gains the advantage of trust, as Brutus trusts him to speak at Caesar’s funeral. At Caesar’s funeral, Antony goes against Brutus’ trust, and reveals Caesar’s will, and incites the plebeians to come to the conclusion that Caesar had been a good man, and that Brutus was in the wrong. Antony reveals his true intentions when he says to himself, “Mischief thou art afoot; / Take thou what course thou wilt” (III. iii. 275-276). Antony had taken advantage of the trust bestowed upon him by pulling off a brilliant act on his part, that effectively persuaded Brutus. Not only that, Antony also takes advantage of the trust that the plebeians had given him. His ulterior motives are revealed when he criticizes Lepidus’ ability to stand besides them and asks, “Is it fit, / The threefold world divided, he should stand / One of the three to share it?” (IV. i. 15-17). This shows how Antony has no intention of fulfilling his promise made to the plebeians to uphold Caesar’s will. Instead, he wants to gain power for himself, and gets rid of Brutus and the other conspirators to get his way. He had acted as a perfect friend/ally to the plebeians as he acted to Brutus, and he also took advantage of them as well.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is against Caesar’s gaining of power. He believes, however, that Caesar is the consummate actor, lulling the populace into believing that he has no personal ambition.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is noted that Julius Caesar killed Pompey in order to gain power over him, overthrowing his position and therefore achieving total authority over Rome in his place. It is here, that Julius Caesar is proven to appear to be somewhat ambitious. This ambition would lead way to persuade many of his senators to doubt his sincerity and question his true intentions for Rome. Meanwhile, as the plebeians spoke highly of him and adored him so, few started to catch onto his uncertain and rather concerning…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many factors that contributed to Octavian's rise to power. Caesar’s death was an important event that helped the rise of Octavian. This is because it created uncertainty through out the people, without a leader could lead to chaos. Octavian, being Caesar's adopted son, was the only possible next in line. Octavian possessed no doubts in eliminating those who stood in his way on the path to power and joined with Lepidus and Antony to generate a "plan for a proscription, yet once this had been decided upon he carried it out more ruthlessly than either of them”. “Augustus alone demanded that no one be spared”. This is such shocking disrespect for those close to Octavian merely demonstrates his absolute commitment to his goal of achieving power and stature. Nothing could stand in his way. The proscription even went so far as to target those who had done no wrong but have writing tablets under their robe, "suspected that he had a sword", “Augustus himself tore out his eyes and sentenced him to death”.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play called Julius Caesar is about the great Roman leader and his rise to power and fall from power. In the play, a character named Antony was a deeply loyal follower of Julius Caesar and when Julius is betrayed by his companions, Antony cowardly took to their side, as to be allowed to talk at Caesar’s funeral. At the funeral, however, he gives a speech that turns the crowd against the conspirators. Antony’s strategies in the funeral speech proved effective and a good use of rhetorics.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, Antony was a genius in how he presented his speech to the populous with how he sparked so many different emotions in them. In the beginning of his speech Antony sparks impatience in the Roman people by making them want to hear what Caesar has left them in his will. And when he finally tells them what he included in it, he made them feel melancholy towards their deceased leader who was described by Antony as a noble and respectable man who cared only for the people and the country that he was about to rule over. But very quickly after that, the audience of Antony’s became enraged towards the men who had called themselves his friends and killed Caesar. They wanted to murder them all and avenge their beloved leader. Antony told them not to be angry, but he clearly did this on purpose because he too wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. He very skillfully manipulated these people’s feelings and made them vengeful as he wanted them to be.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through ‘The Tragedy of King Lear’, Shakespeare represents a distinctive voice in which influences the way we perceive the role of power play in our world as it broadens our understanding of the universality and complexity of power play. Compared with the 21st century film ‘Brassed Off’, we are presented with an insight into the various means of attaining power and its ability to uncover the true nature of people within their struggle for supremacy and control. Shakespeare presents 'The Tragedy of King Lear' as the struggle for power and the political and filial machinations that the desire for power can create. Shakespeare focuses the distinctive voice around the central character King Lear who represents a conceited oppressor whose fall from power prompts the downfall of the Kingdom that he once controlled. The main cause of his demise is his failure to understand and possess a clear vision of the people around him. In Lear's eyes, he sees his eldest daughter Goneril’s facade to be a loyal and true expression, 'Sir I love you more than word can wield the matter/Dearer than eyesight, space and liberty', although Lear's inability to see the truth results in his manipulation and the banishing of his loyal acquaintances; his youngest daughter Cordelia and his dear friend Kent. Although Lear can physically see, it is the understanding, awareness and direction that he lacks and is blind to. In contrast to Lear being physically capable of seeing, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the form of vision that Lear lacks, and consequently Gloucester evades a corollary comparable to Lear's. Here Shakespeare presents his distinctive voice on power play through the depiction of the manipulation and motivation behind the characters struggle for sovereignty. His clever use of his characters and their relationships allows us to gain an insight into the condition of the human psyche throughout their individual attempts at power and highlights the complexities associated…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The assassination of Julius Caesar left Rome without a clear ruler and various people (including Caesar’s adopted nephew Brutus, his general Mark Antony, and his grand-nephew Octavian) fought for power until Octavian (later called Augustus) emerged as the clear winner in this three-way contest for domination of Rome in 30 BC (four-way if Mark Antony’s former ally Lepidus was included). But there was one thing that stood in the way of Octavian’s total rule of Rome: its Senate. It was likely that he would need to say goodbye to his ambition of dominating Rome if he were to openly go against the Roman Senate so he pretended to respect it and in return, the Senate allowed him to remain as consul. He also received extraordinary powers over the provinces…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Power is a theme that has dominated mankind since history was recorded. The assassination of Julius Caesar, ruler of the greatest empire the world has ever known, was a result of such a struggle for power. The foundations of Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' are power relationships which dominate the liaisons between characters of opposing sex, classes, and ambitions. Even in the historical context, Rome in 44 BC, the height of the Roman Republic, predisposes the play to a complex tangle of power conflicts. As the power of prominent characters builds tension, ambitions develops, and thus manipulation arises. Struggles of authority and dominance are evident between the characters in 'Julius Caesar', through Shakespeare's…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lord Acton, a great historian and politician, once said, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” Clearly Acton echoed William Shakespeare, as this theme was portrayed in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Throughout the play, complacency amongst civilians, mutiny, and struggles for power plague the ancient city of Rome, all of which are deeply rooted in the corruption surrounding the government at the time. Shakespeare ultimately reveals that power corrupts, not only the individual who has it, but the society without.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upon news of Caesar’s death, the plebians believed they were “blest that Rome [was] rid of him”. The only one who truly “weeps” about Caesar is Mark Antony, who is considered a “limb of Caesar”. But instead of wanting to revenge Caesar, Antony uses Caesar’s death as a tool to destroy the conspirators and seize power from Brutus. After swaying the plebians with his speech about Caesar’s death, Antony remarks that the “mischief” that he has created is now “afoot”. He sits back to “let it work”. (3.3.275-276). The paltry amount of mourning for Caesar’s death and the use of it in Antony’s political antics reveal the little sentimental value people of Rome felt for Caesar. Brutus, on the other hand, is still remembered and respected to the end of the play. Antony pays his respects to him, “This was the noblest Roman of them all./…/ He [alone] in a general honest thought/ And common good to all [joined] them.” (5.5.74, 77-78). In face of such tragedy, Antony, Brutus’s opponent, regards him as an equal and a noble. Brutus is still highly respected and honored when dead. Antony’s speech helps the reader see Brutus’s honor and push away his evil deeds. These closing…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    •Antony is looked upon as an irresponsible kid who likes to attend plays and go out at night. He was Caesar's loyal assistant. That Antony loved Caesar there is no doubt. There is, however, ample evidence that Antony was the "sleek-headed man" of whom Caesar warns in Act I. His oration at Caesar's funeral was more than an attempt to avenge Caesar's death. It was a power grab. Antony speaks of Caesar's will. During the civil war that follows, he changes the will. Antony ruthlessly orders the murder of hundreds of citizens.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Cesar

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Burton Raffel, an influential critic, writes “Julius Caesar is a relentlessly honest, profoundly moral portrait of the life of power, in which Shakespeare’s characters freely deceive both each other and themselves”. This statement is partially true, giving a person an abundant amount of power can corrupt their intentions. However, the exploitation of Caesar’s power was an exaggerated and dramatized version of the truth. Not every leader who is given authority craves to become an autocrat. Caesar was so hungry for power he was willing to lie to himself, and to the Roman people in order receive it. Eventually Caesar became so confident in himself that he would not listen to the warnings he was given, ultimately leading to his murder.…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays