Preview

Anti-Immigrant Parties: The Know Nothing Party

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
271 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anti-Immigrant Parties: The Know Nothing Party
The Know Nothing Party could largely be described as a protectionist party that held anti-immigrant viewpoints. They also had anti-Catholic leanings as well. Catholic immigrants were perceived to be responsible for a lowering in the quality of life for the average American. These immigrants were said to be satisfied with lower wages, which depressed overall wages for the lower and middle classes.

The Know Nothing Party took a series of different positions to appeal to their voter base. A group of senators wanted to prohibit slavery in the western territories, freeing slaves held in Washington D.C., banning the purchase and sale of slaves, and repealing the Fugitive Slave Act which required people to return runaway slaves to their “owners.”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Know-Nothing Party formed by Protestants who were alarmed by the increase of immigrants from Ireland and Germany…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Free-Soil Party was created in 1848. It was formed for whites that opposed slavery expansion. Additionally, the supporters believed the desecration that black men and women could bring to the new western land. Furthermore, Many Free-Soil party supporters were hostile towards blacks. Yet, a few black and white abolitionists supported their movement because they thought it was away to fight slavery.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the 1760s to the 1860s opposition to slavery grew and morphed, culminating in the outbreak of the American Civil War. The writing of the Three-Fifths Clause, in 1787 (Source 1) reveals how, from the birth of the Union, the issue of slavery forced sides to come to uneasy compromises. Slavery at this time was purely a political and economic issue. Throughout the 100 years however, the opposition to slavery evolved. The formation the single issue party, The Free Soil party, in 1848, symbolised a shift towards a moral opposition to slavery. Although the Free Soil Party had an economic incentive to push for the abolition of slavery, they also argued that free men on free soil offered a morally superior system to slavery. Magee depicts the multifaceted…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Radical Republicans of Congress did not agree with Johnson and his plans for Restoration. They had different beliefs about the South and started "Radical Reconstruction which committed to civil rights for blacks. The Radicals refused to seat any Senator or Representative from the old Confederacy. Radical Reconstruction included laws that required states to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment in order to be readmitted to the Union. Recognizing the widespread devastation in the South, Congress created the Freedmen’s Bureau. The Freedmen’s Bureau engaged in many initiatives to ease the transition from slavery to freedom. It helped freed people gain labor contracts, and devoted much energy to…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southerners opposed that because they think they had a right to slaves in the new…

    • 685 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Liberty Party formed to advocate the total elimination of slavery. Although abolitionists were effective as social agitators, they were less skilled in political organization. The Liberty Party reached its peak of influence in the presidential election of 1844 and still only received 62,300 of the votes, about 2.3%. The total elimination of slavery was too radical for the majority to accept. Less radical movements took hold in the Free-Soil and Republican parties that opposed the further expansion of slavery but accepted its place in the Union.3…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decade of Crisis 1850

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Wilmot Proviso was an amendment proposed, by democrat David Wilmot, to the bill for peace with Mexico in 1846. The amendment stated that all land attained in the treaty with Mexico would be slave free. This proposed amendment would be a debated for years and set out a pressing issue dealing with westward expansion. Southerners thought it was unfair because, “all Americans should have equal rights, including the right to move their property.” Polk tried to compromise by suggesting that we expand the Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific Ocean, with the same rules no slavery in the north of the line and slavery would be allowed south of the line. Another idea that came into play, because of this issue was, “popular sovereignty,” each territory had the right to choose for themselves and with their own representative whether or not they would be free or slave territories. In the election of 1848 both parties tried to avoid this issue as much as possible and a new party formed. They new party opposed slavery as the Free-Soil Party, their candidate was Martin Van Buren. The Free-Soil Party supported the Wilmot Proviso. Although they did not win the election it was an important event in American politics and it showed the lack of capability the current parties had to please the people on the issues. This led to the fall of the second party system.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiiyguftfkv

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question: How did the restoration of voting rights to white Southerners undermine efforts to preserve and protect the voting rights of the freedmen?…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early in his career he gained a hatred for bondage and inequality (Engdahl). Soon he spoke out against slavery and supported ideas like public schools and even the bank. In 1849, he was elected to the House of Representatives, and later became apart of the new Republican Party. Mr. Stevens believed in civil rights and helped many slaves on the Underground Railroad escape to Canada. Soon, the abolishment of slavery became Stevens main focus in the political sphere. Thaddeus Stevens had a large role in the reconstruction of the South, later serving on the joint committee on reconstruction, which drafted the Reconstruction Act of 1867 (“Thaddeus Stevens Biography”). Stevens views on slavery and reconstruction brought about feuding with President Andrew Johnson (Rowe).…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the Civil War, Democrats tried to put a stop to Reconstruction. After the Thirteenth Amendment was passed, “radical Republicans in Congress began arguing that freedmen should be allowed to vote on equal terms with whites… Most Democrats… opposed this bill” (Document G). This is an example of how Democrats wanted to stop Reconstruction. For example, they didn’t want blacks to have equal rights of whites. Additionally, they didn’t want blacks to integrate back into society, which was one of the…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ch 1 Creating A Nation

    • 3953 Words
    • 23 Pages

    4. The dissolution of the Union began with the secession of the state of ____________________.…

    • 3953 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States is well known as “the nation of immigrants”. It is a place where different cultures meet and diverge. Despite of the united states being known as nation of immigrants, Americans have also been known for their sentiments against immigrants. This is known as anti-immigration. Anti-immigration is defined as Americans that don't like immigrants immigrating to the United States. Leaders of the anti-immigration movement have us believing that not an ounce of racism lies behind their efforts.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1860s election,the topic of slavery brought many political tensions to the Republicans and Democrats.The Republicans was an anti-slavery party.The Republicans disagree of the spreading of slavery and would take this issue to Congress,whenever they can,to stop its expansion.They viewed slavery as an a problem that would last forever,and thought the problem would soon lead to extinction (http://www.tulane.edu/~latner/Background/BackgroundElection.html). As for the Democrats,they were pro-slavery party.They viewed slavery was good not only for the slave holder,but also for the slave(John C. Calhoun).In the 1850s Abraham Lincoln said that slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” but later on in his first Inaugural Address he said that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.”Abraham Lincoln personally didn't like slavery but as a Republican he wished to abolish it.But as the President of America,he made a promise to the Constitution,which protected slavery (http://www.history.com/topics/emancipation-proclamation). Therefore the tension that rose from slavery resulted in constant fighting of the Republicans and Democrats.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Immigrant Beliefs

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Nativists are Americans that are working to stop foreign influence in America. They have engaged in anti-immigrant practices such as: turning away immigrants looking for jobs, not allowing Catholics and foreigners to hold a position in office, they also want to create a 21 year waiting period to become a citizen. These people are also called the "Know-Nothing Party" They oppose allowing Catholic Immigrants to hold office because they believe allowing them in office will allow the Pope to have a hold in America and eventually take away the freedom we Americans fought for. They don’t want to risk giving power to anyone who’s not “native” because the country already fought so much for freedom and don’t want to jeopardize…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Radical Republicans

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Members of the Radical Republican Party wanted the abolition of slavery and equality for freed slaves. Members also went against the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Fugitive Slave Acts. There were many well-known members of the party that became a very powerful force in congress in the late 19th century such as: Thaddeus Stevens, Charles Sumner, Benjamin Butler, Fredrick Douglass, and Benjamin Wade. Several members were appointed chairman of important committees. Thaddeus Stevens was appointed chairman of Ways and Means, Owen Lovejoy was appointed chairman of agriculture, and Henry Wilson was appointed chairman of judiciary and so on.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays