Preview

Anti-Federal Government Benefits

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
365 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anti-Federal Government Benefits
Two different plans were devised in a convention. The Federalists, the majority, implemented the Virginia plan, a statewide government based on the population. “The federalists supported the constitution and preferred a strong national government,” (pg. 57). The Anti-Federalists supported the New Jersey plan, where each state gets the same amount of representation. “The Anti-Federalist opposed the constitution and preferred a decentralized federal government; they took their name by default, in reaction to their better –organized opponents,” (pg. 57). Both parties agreed that government should be limited, but they disagreed on what the limits should be. I believe the Federalists will serve better with a government with broad powers that has …show more content…
It didn’t have an executive branch to execute the laws and it didn’t have a nationwide court system to explicate them. A congress was the only representation of the national government, but it could not do force the states to act against their will. This was partly because it was called a confederacy, which gives power to the states. The American colonists did not like a strong national government because of the British. This led to a lack of centered leadership, an economic disorder, and a lack of ability. The colonists fought hard with the little power for the legacy we have today. Today, we have the power, but yet so many incompetent events are taking place. America is propelling away from the constitution. “Reports have documented this steady decline in civic understanding. In 1998, the Department of Education found that 75 percent of high school seniors were ‘not proficient in civics; one third lacked even a basic comprehension of how the government operates, while only 9 percent could give two reasons why citizens should participate in the democratic,’” (pg. 86). Its people are currently frustrated with the government. Some do not even know the basic structure of how it operates. Most people today refuse to compromise, in order to look perfect or just not to look

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Their was way too much power in the constitution. It had to be divided. The first one it was divided into was federalism, which…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to make and establish the laws, the colonists needed to first form their own type of government because they could not rely on the British to make or even enforce their laws from such a far ways away. A change from what the colonists were used to was formed as a result of this. Instead of having to suffer under a malicious monarchy such as they did in England, the settlers wanted to establish a democracy in which wealthy and poor people alike had a say and choice of what to do. This idea of democracy is what is still present in America today and it is thriving unlike other countries whose government is completely controlled by one man or a selective group alone. It is thriving because everyone has a voice on the matters at hand and this voice is ultimately what leads to the formation of laws that benefit the majority of people in the country on a positive aspect. The first step the colonists took in order to achieve democracy, was to set up the House of Burgesses in 1619. This was established in Jamestown and was for a while the lone government.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government was set up under the Articles of Confederation, America’s first constitution. The founders were so afraid of a strong central government that they gave all power to the states, rather than set up an over-seeing national government. The Revolution was fought to get away from an overbearing and unfair ruler, so it is understandable why they wouldn’t want another monarchy to take over. The problem was that the Articles of Confederation gave little to no power at all to their national government, causing distress and non-compliance between the states. The Articles of Confederation denied the government the ability to take care of the states and the union. An influential philosopher at the time, Hobbes, believes that it is the sole purpose of the national government to enforce peace and laws; thus making life, liberty, and the pursuit of property possible. Another influential philosopher at the time, Locke, also believes that a central government is necessary to promote public good, to protect property and promote…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It could only suggest and appeal laws. By not being able to enforce laws, there is no central authority whatsoever. Therefore, it’s almost as if each state was an independent country. This was evident during Shay’s Rebellion. This was a rebellion of poor people in Massachusetts. The central government was unable to step in due to its lack of power. Lastly, it was virtually impossible for Congress to pass any new laws. A vote of two thirds of the states was required to pass any law. This was nearly impossible due to the fact that there were only thirteen states. The Articles of Confederation set up an extremely weak central government. The central government was almost useless due to its lack of…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question of whether the judicial branch of the government proposed in the Constitution is given too much power is not very simple to answer. The antifederalist believed strongly that the the federal judiciary would become too powerful and that the judges would abuse their positions. The federalist argued that the system would work fine and that the balances would prevent the judiciary branch from gaining too much power over the other two. The antifederalists thought that the proposed federal judiciary would go against individual liberty and would eventually absorb the duties and roles of state judiciary.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    morgan overcomes

    • 293 Words
    • 1 Page

    From 1781 to 1788, the government of the U.S. was based on the Articles of Confederation. Congress, as defined by this early document, wasn't strong enough to prevent the 13 states from acting independently. Each state had its own government and could make its own laws. Each could coin its own money and arm its own soldiers. The states competed with one another for business and trade. They were like 13 separate nations rather than one. Congress couldn't raise taxes, borrow money, issue national money, control trade between states or with foreign nations, raise armies, or establish post offices. Most important, it couldn't settle quarrels between states. The new nation was divided…

    • 293 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government was a topic of controversy in pre colonial America, and it still is today. However, America wouldn’t be America without the ideas that the founding fathers set out. As presented in Wickers lecture on The Constitution, The Constitution set forth the idea of the three branches of government. This makes for a more fair system of government, and a far cry from a king born into the right family ruling the people’s every move. There would be no democracy,…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist’s structure of government is superior to that of the Anti-Federalists because we have a better idea of how the government should be run. The Anti-Federalist’s want to include so many things that we do not need like a bill of rights, and a set number of representatives from each state.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The weak and reactionary Articles of Confederation failed to adequately address the rights of colonies; each state had diverse needs that were not being represented in the government. The Articles were drafted in fear that a tyrannical government would emerge after the Revolution, but they were too powerless to enforce taxation. These issues were rectified by the Constitution’s strong centralized government.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They felt a large national government would be too far removed from the power of the people because it would be governing a large body of constituents, however, by giving more power to the states the Anti-Federalist felt the power would remain with the people.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederation Flaws

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The federal government did not have the power to establish a common currency among the states or collect taxes. This resulted in an economic downturn and an increase in national debt. Congress did not have the power to regulate interstate and international trade as well. Also, creating laws became a challenge because a two thirds majority was needed to pass laws and all states needed to agree to amend the Articles ("The Articles of Confederation, 1777"). The Articles did not establish a court system or an executive branch, causing the acts of Congress to be left unenforced. Therefore, power no longer lied with the people, but with the states and a single assembly ("The Articles of Confederation, 1777"). The articles did not create the republican government that was called for by the…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It may not sound very American to say, but the constitution has it’s flaws. The checks and balances of the federal government are only as strong as the integrity of the officials in the three branches. A group with similar ideas can take over all three and make deals amongst themselves. The state governments need more power to keep a check on the National government.Another issue with a strong centra government is that people in different states have vastly different beleifs and ideologies, and many of them even if held by an entire state, may not make it to the federal government. Richard Henry Lee said “In this congressional legislature, a bare majority of votes can enact commercial laws; so that the representatives of the seven Northern States, as they will have a majority, can, by law, create the most oppressive monopoly upon the five Southern States, whose circumstances and productions are essentially different from those of theirs, although not a single man of these voters are the representatives of, or amenable to, the people of the Southern States.“ And that was just with differences in opinion between the limited number of states that existed them. Now, with 50 states and an ever rising population, there are more differences than ever. A stronger state government would result in more diversity between states, laws more fitting to the beliefs of individual states opinion. Then the small federal government would make sure that these…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government was not always the same is it is today. The first thirteen colonies did not have three branches of federal government. They didn’t have a main federal government at all actually. The country we know today started off with the thirteen colonies. The colonists did not like the idea of federalism, a strong central government.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now let’s move on to creative federalism, which had a direct link to federal and local government, making it a weaker state form. Now for current federalism, the new federalism or competitive federalism. New federalism, is an overall competition of the governments in their relationships, making an overall competitive government. The many disadvantages of federal government can be summed up with it allowing inequality between states, in history it protected segregation and even slavery, and the blockage of national policies by the state. Federalism works for what it is, do I think states should have more power? Sure, but, knowing how people see their government on a state level It could be implosive. A check and balance system will always be a more logical concept then, either having…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays