Preview

Anti-Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1060 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anti-Death Penalty
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is where an individual is put to death by the government for a crime they have committed. The death penalty is an ineffective and cruel response to a violent crime. The "eye for an eye" mentality will never solve anything. A revenge philosophy certainly leads to an endless cycle of violence. It is important to send a message to society that striking back at your enemy purely for revenge will always make matters worse. We teach children very early on that two wrongs don’t make a right. Why then does this not apply to our own government? In 2002, Ray Krone was the 100th condemned American to be freed from death row through DNA evidence after serving 10 years for a murder he didn’t commit. Krone was accused of killing and sexually assaulting Phoenix bartender Kim Ancona in 1991. The death sentence was based off a testimony by a dental expert who matched bite marks on the victim with Krone’s teeth. But, in 2002 new DNA testing showed that the saliva on the victim’s tank top did not, in fact, belong to Krone, but to Kenneth Phillips, who is currently serving prison time for an unrelated sex crime.

The number stands at over 142, and still counting, of wrongly convicted people sentenced to death by the government. Even DNA evidence can’t guarantee we won’t execute innocent people. If someone is convicted and later found innocent, you can release them from prison, but not from the grave. We have an imperfect justice system where innocent defendants are given minimal legal attention by often lesser qualified individuals. Some would blame the court system, not the death penalty itself for the problems but we can’t risk mistakes. The death penalty does not prevent others from committing murder. No reliable study shows the death penalty prevents crimes. Homicide rates are higher in states and regions that have the death penalty than in those that do not.

Most people don’t realize that carrying out one death sentence

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    George Bernard Shaw once said, “Murder and capital punishment are not opposites that cancel one another out but similar that breed their kind” (quoted in Costanzo 95). This shows why the act of the death penalty is not a deterrence to future criminals. If an individual truly feels the need to harm someone else, he/she will do it regardless of the consequences. By putting a murderer to death the, law is killing people, an act they are trying to deter people from.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the death penalty gives closure to the families of slain victims (Should). They feel like justice has been served. Secondly, it contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system (Should). It is true all U.S. and state federal prisons are overpopulated, some as much as 33% (U.S.). Another reason people are pro-capital punishment, is because DNA testing is now available and can now effectively eliminate almost all uncertainty as to a person 's guilt or innocence (Should). Many people who opposed the death penalty are now for it, all because of the availability of DNA testing. They think if DNA proves a person is guilty, then they are guilty. However, what if there is not any DNA evidence, but other evidence linking a person to a crime such as, an…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society demands that punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. As long as capital punishment exists in our society it will continue to spark the injustice, which it has failed to curb. The death penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment, has no proof of acting as deterrent, and risks the appalling and unacceptable injustice of executing innocent people. It does not matter who does the killing as long as a life is taken by another, it should always be considered…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we were to get rid of the death penalty, we would be making all criminal acts proportionate to their convictions, except for murder, which would never allow for equal justice. So, the real question is what the judicial system will do to prevent these incorrect convictions in future? The death penalty is the top tier of capital punishment and is reserved for the darkest of crimes. If convicted murderers get less than they deserve, what message does that send to other criminals who might commit the same act? This argument fails for the same reasons that discrimination fails and that is that getting rid of the death penalty contradicts with getting rid of…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” otherwise known as the law of retaliation is the idea that when someone does something wrong to us we are allowed to retaliate in a similar degree to even the wrong done. The use of the death penalty in the United States as a form of legal punishment reflects this very concept. More frequent than not, when the death penalty is being sought within a criminal trial it is paired with a murder charge. This desire to inflict an essentially “even” punish for murder, effectively sentencing a person to death yourself because of the choice to take a life, reflects the very essence of the law of retaliation. While the law of retaliation has no limitations and in theory is something we may always put into practice, the death penalty is not such a thing and is instead a highly regulated form of punishment or “retaliation”.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always the problem of someone being wrongly convicted. “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment”(Pilkington). Even though the number of innocently convicted people is not that high once an innocent man or woman has been executed there is no way to undo what has been done. The criminal justice system is not perfect and they too sometimes make mistakes. “Whether our criminal justice system has executed an innocent man should no longer be an open question. We don't know how often it happens, but we know it has happened. Cameron Todd Willingham's case proves that. As long as our system of justice makes mistakes -- including the ultimate mistake -- we cannot continue executing people” (Scheck). Sometimes people make mistakes but innocent people being convicted and executed for a crime they didn’t commit is a mistake that can be prevented by making sure the death penalty isn’t an option for punishment any more. Innocent people don’t have to worry about this anymore if the death penalty is no longer possible there are also other options of punishment besides…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many look upon this topic as a religious moral issue. The National Coalition against Death Penalty states that “the death penalty devalues all human life- eliminating the possibility for transformation of human spirit.” This organization also states that the death penalty “is fallible and irrevocable” , their studies show that over 100 inmates have been released from death row after new technological testing regarding their cases found them to be innocent.(1) On the reverse side of this religious outlook, there are those such as J. Melton that believe, the death penalty was started by God, himself when wrote in the bible, “He that killeth by the sword must be killed by the sword.”(Revelations 13:10). (2) There have been studies by Emory University professors, in 2003, state that each execution deters an average of 18 murders. A similar study in 2004 stated that it is believed that speeding up execution would strengthen deterrent effect. For every 2.75 years cut from time spent on death row it is said that 1 murder would be prevented. Another aspect of the death penalty is that of those who believe that rehabilitation is ineffective and capital punishment is the only punishments that is equivalent to some of the violent offenses committed and think that it is a way for closure for the families of the victims.(3) In my opinion, I believe that it is not just a…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meme

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The main problem with the death penalty is that those that are wrgonly accused can still be executed. On estimate, one death row inmate is wrongly executed out of every seven! ("Update: Death Penalty") "The 100-Plus innocent people exonerated from death row represent further proof that the death penalty should be abolished." (Update: Death Penalty") This means that if the accused's verdict is incorrect and they are sent to death before they realize that he was wrongly accused, that's one innocent life wasted that could have been saved if this punishment was not used. A way that this could happen could be caused due to bad lawyers. "Perhaps the most important factor in determining whether a defendant will receive the death penalty is the quality of the representation he or she is provided. Almost all defendants in capital cases cannot afford their own attorneys. In many cases, the appointed attorneys are overworked, underpaid, or lacking the trial experience required for death penalty cases. There have even been instances in which lawyers appointed to a death case were so inexperienced that they were completely unprepared for the sentencing phase of the trial. Other appointed attorneys have slept through parts of the trial, or arrived at the court under the influence of alcohol." (Facts & Figures of the Death Penalty) This goes to show on how biased and unfair this punishment is. If the defendant's lawyer isn't as…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major purpose of the death penalty is to punish people for their horrible crimes. However, the death penalty has put many innocent people on death row. Since 1973, 156 people have been exonerated (released from death row/evidence shows they aren’t guilty). The average time between getting the death sentence and exoneration is about 11 years. This is already terrible, forcing innocent people to believe that their life is nearly over, because of a crime that they didn’t commit, but it gets worse. It is very likely that people living in the United States have been wrongly executed. Multiple cases have evidence that proves that the “criminal” is actually innocent. In 1991, the house of Cameron Todd Willingham was destroyed by a fire, killing the three children who were sleeping inside. Willingham escaped and his wife was shopping at the time. Prosecutors stated that Willingham had purposefully set the house on fire to cover up the abuse of his children. He was executed by lethal injection in 2004. However, there is a proof that shows that the fire was not caused by Willingham. Unfortunately, nothing can be done now because these people have already been executed, but it does teach us one thing: If the death penalty cannot be used to punish the real offender and risks the lives of innocent people in the process, it can’t be used by our…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Punishment is characterized as the judicature, where a person is sentenced when he or she has committed a grievous offense and is followed by the execution of the individual. Although, most states that concede capital punishment have an age requirement, it is legal to dictate death sentence on a minor, in certain cases. In every society a form of punishment is imposed on those who break the law to discourage future wrongdoers. Indeed capital punishment is a practice that has been applied since the ancient times, and has become a very controversial issue in the United States and worldwide; and it has passed through many legal disputes that even came to a halt while the Supreme Court was discussing the case to reach a decision which later upheld the…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has not been proven to deter crime and it opens the possibility of executing innocent people. That is why the United States of America should abolish the death penalty.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime is a part of everyday life and everyone is aware of the threat it possesses, but the question lies in the methods in which it should be dealt with. A major issue in today’s society is whether or not the death penalty is a proper form of punishment. Many people have different opinions on the issue because of its many pros and cons. The arguments against the death penalty show that executions are more expensive than life in prison, the innocent may be wrongly accused, and it is not a deterrent to crime.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays