Preview

Answer of Kpmg Aptitude Test

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
699 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Answer of Kpmg Aptitude Test
KPMG经典24题

The Classical 24 Numerical Reasoning

"The big economic difference between nuclear and fossil-fuelled powerstations is that nuclear reactors are more expensive to build and decommission, but cheaper to sun. So disputes 答案详解
1. E
(28x200+25x100)/(100%-10%)=9000
2. C
(20x250+16x300) x6%=588
3. B
Region E (permanent: temporary)=3:2
Region SE Total: 400 Permanent: 150 Temporary: 250
(New) Permanent: 400x3/5=240 Temporary: 400x2/5=160
所以我们可以得出P增加了90人,T减少了90人
90x(30-18)=1080
(我们可以用其他方法算,但是却不是最节约时间的算法)
4. E
目测,(SE和SW的P每小时接的电话数是最高的,而且SW的P的人数多,所以总数上SW可定比SE要高。虽然E的每小时接电话数不高,但是他人数最多,所以总数也很高)
5. C
(43200+80000+16000) x105%-11232-12096-21600-19200-4160-4640=73232
6. A
(40x120x4-1600)/16000=20%
7. A
43200/48-44000/50=20
8. D
80000/50/25=64
9. E
(2.50-2.40)/2.40x2.50+2.50=2.604
(1.10-1.08)/1.08x1.10+1.10=1.120
2.604-1.120=1.48
10. A
1.70-(3.20-1.70)=0.2
11. C
(1.70-0.3)x(1-15%)=1.19
12. E
1.08x(1-20%)/2.40=36%
13. G
(70-50)x4x40x3=9600
14. B
50x40x4x6+50x4x4x10=56000
15. E
3/2.4x40-40=10
16. C
(40-38)x4x3x(55+40)=2280
17. C
8000/61.8-100/1.62=67.72
不管在Yr 1,用了多少英镑买泰铢,我们要知道的是在Yr 2,8000泰铢可换多少英镑,所以用第二年的汇率,而不是第一年的。
18. F
1000x1.52/1.62x11.1=10415
19. D
(65.4-61.8)/61.8=5.8% 升值,这是直接法,所以在Yr 1,1英镑可换65.4泰铢,而Yr 2,1英镑之可以换到61.8的泰铢,这说明泰铢升值了。(这里英镑是基准货币)
20. B
目测法,看两年直接之变化最大的,注意单位(全部看作是百位数)
21. E
(150-110)/110=36%
22. G
1000000/8/5=25000
23. A
10.5-9.5x(1+10%)=0.05
24. A
目测法,1&2年,价格最低,产量也最低。

KPMG经典36题

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As a society grows and develops, there are many issues the people must face during the process. One of the most important problems modern civilizations must solve is where and how they get their energy. In our day and age, we rely heavily on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil. Patrick Moore, a writer for the Washington Post, composes an argument for nuclear power and recommends that it should be the future for all things energy. Moore’s argument is a convincing article that would most likely pull many neutral readers to see his side very clearly. The article gives all the pros to the uses of nuclear energy, and does an excellent job of addressing all possible counter-arguments.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to meet the demands of our society today, and to remain a world power, we must adopt a nuclear energy power. Tucker…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The use of Nuclear Power has always been a controversial subject, but during the technology’s…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    These scenarios have led to nuclear power having a very bad public reputation despite numerous statistics showing that other energy sources have been much more…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plant owners spend numerous amounts of money to produce nuclear energy to power houses. Mining the uranium to build and run the plant costs millions of dollars alone. That’s not even counting the many workers it takes to run the plant, and the process itself. The owners of the plant have failed to auction it off 3 times over the course of 3 years. The plant takes way too…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global nuclear power plants and its industry have been a high expense for government subsidies,tax credit, or any form of public support in favor of the industry. A half century later, we have noticed that nuclear power is, instead, too expensive to finance. The first generation of nuclear power plants proved so costly to build that half of them were abandoned during construction. In addition , huge cost overruns are discovered which were passed on to utility customers…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eart Science Review

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Suppose an electric-generating power plant is about to be built near your house. The local government has not decided whether to allow coal, nuclear, or oil as fuel for the plant (natural gas is not an option). Some groups argue coal is the best choice because there is a 200-year supply and using coal reduces our dependence on foreign oil. Critics argue that burning coal produces three times more global-warming gasses than oil. Coal also produces more dust and expels more acid-rain-causing gases than oil. Others argue that nuclear-generated power produces no greenhouse gases and no other atmospheric pollution. Critics argue that there is presently no long-term location to store the radioactive waste that will be generated and question the safety of nuclear power. Over the life of the plant, nuclear is the least expensive option, followed by coal and then oil.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the reasoning aptitude assessment survey, I realized the importance of my critical thinking skills and how it affect the outcome of my work in business environment. The survey provided a concise response to my personal interest with a clear purpose to analyze my thinking style and how I process information, which will eventually be utilize in career path later on in life.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have discovered countless energy sources, from fossil fuel combustion to nuclear fission and fusion, each of which have seemed to pose a different problem. Whether the problematic effect seems to be cost or carbon dioxide emission, renewable and nonrenewable resources have both seemed to come with a fair set of cons with their pros. Extensive research on the topic has shown that there seems to be no flawless source of energy extraction, however there certainly are sources that are relatively worse than others. This being said, nuclear energy, from the fusion and fission of radioactive elements, is one of the worst sources of energy because of its immense waste, danger to the general public, and large expenses.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No new nuclear power plants should be built because the increasing energy demand in the United States can be met with less negative environmental impact with power generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and tidal power. The “zero emissions” benefit of nuclear energy is a common misconception. The actual reaction in a nuclear power plant only creates steam and radioactive waste; it does not produce greenhouse gasses or particulate matter that the combustion of fossil fuels creates. But, due to reliance on existing fossil-fuel power for plant construction, decommissioning, and fuel processing as well as the mining, enrichment, and transport of uranium, the nuclear…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While there is no doubting that solar and wind will create jobs and bring in its own income, ultimately nuclear power will be more beneficial for the United States. In order to bring wind generated energy production up the tax payer will pay a heavy price, to raise the wind energy production level from just 1.5% to 4% over the next ten years it will cost at least $29 billion in federal subsidies (Alexander). Nuclear power is better suited for the economy as it is a cheaply produced source of energy, yet the United States is not capitalizing on it. This lack of nuclear energy investment on the United States is resulting in other countries to capture the benefits of this cheap energy source; China, Russia and Japan are all cashing in on nuclear power for its cheap energy. The benefit of cheap energy is that energy intensive industries have an incentive to set up sites using nuclear energy for the lessened power bill they have to pay. If other countries continue to produce cheap energy American industries may want to consider moving to these countries with lower energy costs. If businesses move over seas the United States losses jobs to other countries and we are no better…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion , Nuclear energy is much more efficient than energy from Fossil fuels but the cost of nuclear energy not so low . Coal is the cheapest way to produce power . In my view , people need to improve alternative resources of production an electrisity…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in an era of untold gasoline prices and frequent political dialogue about finding and using alternative forms of energy. Some of these alternative energy sources that are being bantered about and, in some places, implemented include solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. The majority of Americans would agree that all of these forms of alternative energy are safe and should be pursued as new means of powering the country. However, there is one well-known energy source that stirs up dissent and division among the country’s citizens: nuclear power.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays