Anomie: the Norm of Normlessness in Modern Society

Topics: Sociology, Émile Durkheim, Anomie Pages: 7 (2477 words) Published: April 11, 2006
Anomie, first developed by Emile Durkheim, is very evident in today's society. The concept of anomie, according to Durkheim, is a state of normlessness, where individuals are succumbed to deregulation in their lives and through out their society brought on by a social change. Robert K. Merton, following the ideas of Durkheim, developed his own notion of anomie, called Strain Theory. Merton argued that anomie was a day to day function in society, seen as a social structure that embraces the same goals to all of its members without giving them equal means to achieve them. In the name of progress, modern society has promised a better world, yet in modern society anomie has not become the exception but instead the norm.

Emile Durkheim, a French Sociologist, originally introduced the concept of anomie in his first paper called The Division of Labor in Society, in 1893. According to Emile Durkheim there are two kinds of societies with one being simple called mechanic solidarity and the other being complex or organic solidarity. In mechanic societies there is a high solidarity among all members of that society; they have the same beliefs, religion, and means of survival. As society becomes increasingly organic there is more differentiation between members of that society since not everyone endures the same role. Once societies become organic, work also becomes more complex and there is an increase in the division of labor, and specialized economic activity. By becoming different from each other through their work, individuals become more different in their lives, resulting in a decrease of the collective conscience, community sharing common sediments, and the collective constraint. Individualism replaces the collective conscience. In this society, people are no longer tied to one another and social bonds are impersonal. The term anomie refers to the breakdown of social norms and it a condition where norms no longer control the activities of members in society. Individuals cannot find their place in society without clear rules to help guide them. Changing conditions as well as adjustment of life leads to dissatisfaction, conflict, and deviance. Durkheim felt that sudden change caused a state of anomie. The mechanic solidarity of simple societies that are intended to replace the social and moral forms had not developed fully thus modern society was experiencing a crisis of morality in a period of transition (Fenton, 1984, p.20). The system of norms and values breaks down either during a great prosperity or a great depression.

Discussing anomie more in depth and in addition to wanting sociology to be defined as scientific, Durkheim refers to the theory of suicide, not as an individualistic act but a societal problem. He sought to explain suicide not as to why it occurs, he left that to psychology, but as a social fact, which required other social facts and empirical research for an explanation. Durkheim believed that the rates of suicide dealt with social integration or interaction of society and social regulation. Categorizing suicide into four types; egoism, altruism, anomie and fatalism, he attempted to describe reasons individuals possibly choose such a harsh outcome. Egoism or egotistical suicide refers to low social integration, a feeling of not part of society or society not part of the individual. Through empirical research, Durkheim concluded that a Protestant unmarried man was most likely to commit suicide for reasons that described the individual as having low social integration. The Protestant religion is not as integrated as the Christian or Jewish religions Durkheim studied and as well as married people are more socially integrated than unmarried individuals and men commit suicide more than women. Altruism or altruistic suicide, described as extreme social integration, lack of individuality. Anomie or anomic suicide refers to low regulation or in other words, the regulative powers are...

References: American Demographics, Feb 1, p16 PHILANTHROPY POST- 2001 2002 SEPT 11. (World Trade Center and Pentagon Attacks)(Brief Article)(Statistical Data Included) Full Text: COPYRIGHT 2002 PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media.
Brym, R. J. New Society, Sociology for the 21st Century, 2001 3rd Ed. Toronto: Harcourt Canada.
Canada and the World Backgrounder, Oct. v69 i2 p18(6) 2003 Under suspicion: since the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, Arabs and Muslims around the world have become targets of discrimination. (Minorities-- Arabs/Muslims) Full Text: COPYRIGHT 2003 Canada & the World.
Fenton, S. Durkheim and Modern Sociology. Cambridge, New 1984 York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Giddens, A. (Ed). Emile Durkheim, Selected Writings. 1972 Cambridge, New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service, Oct 8, pK5144 2001 Sept. 11 attacks make job market tougher. (Knight Ridder Newspapers) Jessica Guynn. Full Text: COPYRIGHT 2001 Knight-Ridder/Tribune News Service
Ritzer, G. and Goodman, D. J. Sociological Theroy, 6th Ed. 2004 New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thompson, K. Emile Durkheim. London and New York: Tavistock 1982 Publications.
Wolfe, K. H. (Ed.)Emile Durkheim, 1858-1917. A Collection 1960 of Essays, with Translations and a Bibliography. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • The Anomie Essay
  • Anomie Essay
  • Anomie Essay
  • Modern Society Essay
  • Modern Society Essay
  • Social Anomie Essay
  • comparing the Amish society and British modern day society, values and norms Essay
  • Anomie Theory Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free