Preview

Annexation Of Crimea Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1042 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Annexation Of Crimea Research Paper
Russia and Ukraine have had several conflicts throughout the years. In their latest conflict, and worst East-West crisis since the Cold war, Vladimir Putin gave a speech arguing Crimea should be a Russian territory. The Russian Empire seized Crimea in 1783, during the reign of Catherine the Great. Crimea was established as an, it returned to being part of Russia in 1945. In 1921, Crimea was established as an autonomous republic until 1945 when it lost its status as an autonomous republic because of the collaboration of a significant number of Crimeans with the German forces. Crimea went back to being a part of Russia up to 1954, when then soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev returned Crimea to the Ukranian SSR . In 1991 when Ukraine became independent, …show more content…
Liberalists believe international laws are crucial to keep the peace between the countries and make them work together. Clearly Putin does not support Liberalism as he completely ignored international laws and the warnings from the United States and Western Europe. Even more interesting is how Liberalism has been losing its purpose without an opponent. “Without an opposing ideology since the end of the Cold War, liberalism has turned in upon itself. Liberal countries have been destroying their last “illiberal” elements, such as sexism, racism and homophobia, in order to have its always-necessary opponent, and maintain purpose.” This left the liberal West searching for a new opponent or enemy that liberalism so desperately needed. The Crimean annexation gave them the perfect argument to once again depict Putin and Russia as enemies. What Russia did violated international laws, but if this is not the firs time this happens why is it that the United States and Western Europe have made it look like a horrible crime? “Dugin believes the liberal West has presented Putin and Russia as villains, not because the Russian actions in the Crimea and the Ukraine are illegitimate, but rather because liberalism once again needs an enemy.” Putin’s argument is strong and persuasive. Crimea had been part of Russia ever since the end of the 18th century, it is composed of mostly Russian speakers, and the majority of their population is Russian. Most important of all, it has been stated Crimeans are actually in favor of joining Russia. “More than 82 percent of the electorate took part in the vote. Over 96 percent of them spoke out in favour of reuniting with Russia. These numbers speak for themselves. “ Russia’s annexation of Crimea seems logical and Putin presents a strong argument in favor of it; but the liberal West needs it too look like a crime. Liberalism

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The defeat in the Crimean war was arguably the main reason why Alexander II made a series of reforms when he came into power. The devastating loss of the war proved the backwardness of Russia in relation to other powers and even though peasant unrest and the criticisms of serfdom were partially responsible for influencing Alexander II, the decision to make changes primarily came from the loss of the Crimean war.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Stalingrad, which lasted from August 1942 until February 1943, was one of the bloodiest warfare in World War II. It was a turning point of the war because it was Nazi Germany’s first major loss during the Second World War. Most importantly, the Soviet Union stopped Nazi Germany from gaining resources and the war caused a large casualty rate of German armies.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Often times today, we Americans forget that our independence was not simply given, but earned after a long and hard fought conflict known as the Revolutionary War. Mainly between the British and the colonists, the war lasted 7 years. It wasn’t until two years in that the Americans finally had their chance to win, a year when the British were certain they could bring this rebellion to an end. The Battle of Saratoga was a major turning point in the war that gave the Americans a new sense of confidence and convinced the French to become official American allies (“Battle of Saratoga”).…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He implores the American people to contemplate about "innocent victims," a "modern wave of terrorism," and the battle that one day can "plague greater than Syria 's borders" (Putin, APFCFR). This statement advocates his audience to recognize the consequences of their preceding military conflict and to create connections with current disputes to ones that occurred in the past. Putin then provides a prospective not relating towards the United States. When not directly accusing the United States of exacerbating international conflicts he permits his audience to acknowledge that their government provides "foreign weapons," which have contributed to one of the "bloodiest wars in the world" (Putin, APFCFR). This statement is perhaps the most compelling Putin makes. He does this because he acknowledges Americans as strong-willed individuals who can take action into their hands; he wants them to reason with themselves and promote ideals genuine to humans as a…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Monroe Doctrine is the most important policy during this time. It stated the further efforts by European nations to colonize land or interfere with states in North or South American would be viewed as acts of aggression requiring U.S. intervention. This policies primary objective was to free the newly independent colonies of Latin America from European intervention and to control what would make this New World a battle ground. The doctrine put forward that the New World and the Old World were to distinctly remain separate spheres of influence, for they are composed of entirely separate and independent nations. While you are in office I believe this policy should be kept in place.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the 1820s, the Monroe Doctrine has been the foundation of the U.S. policy toward Latin America. However, it has been interpreted many different ways. Some U.S. presidents have broadly interpreted it, expanding its meaning. Others have taken it to mean only what it states.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Monroe Doctrine - The doctrine that European nations should not interfere with American nations or try to acquire more territory in the Western Hemisphere. The Monroe Doctrine was derived from President Monroe's message in Congress on December 2, 1823 and became a part of United States foreign policy.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A brief potted history of Russian dynastic history over the past 1,000 including key events and people-…

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In June of 1812, Napoleon began his deadly Russian campaign, a landmark in the history of the caustic potential of warfare. All mainland Europe was under his control, and the invasion of Russia was an effort to force Tsar Alexander planned once again to the terms of a treaty that Napoleon had enforced upon him four years earlier. Having collected nearly half a million soldiers, from France as well as all of the states of Europe, Napoleon entered Russia at the lead of the largest army ever seen. The Russians, under the power of Marshal Kutuzov, could not hope to defeat him in a direct conflict.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russification is a form of cultural assimilation process during which non-Russian communities, voluntarily or not, give up their culture and language in favor of the Russian one (Trueman). The term refers to both official and unofficial policies for national minorities in Russia, aimed at Russian domination. Russification was constructed in 1770 and still continues today in present-day Russia. Most of these “non-Russian” communities are areas that seceded from Russia but maintain strong Russian culture. Current Russian president, Vladimir Putin, supports Russification to the extent of forcing former Russian areas to accept the dominant Russian culture and learn the central language, Russian. Putin reiterates the seemingly positive aspect of Russification,“This civilizational identity is based on preservation of Russian cultural dominance, which is not only carried by ethnic Russians, but all carriers of this identity regardless of nationality. This is the cultural code that has, in the recent years, been subject to some serious trials, which people have tried and continue to try to break” (Bridge). While Russification displays a sense of unity within the country and other surrounding areas, imposing a different culture or language on a group of people removes their culture they have established within their own community.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris Stephen.” Fears of east-west split in Ukraine.” Guardian.co.uk. Guardian News and Media. Sunday 28 November, 2004. Web. 6 April, 2010.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Russia takes over Ukraine 's Crimea region." Haaretz.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Mar. 2014. .…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crimea, a region of southern Ukraine has its own parliament separate from the Ukraine. But has been part of Ukraine since the 1950s. The Crimean port city of Sevastopol is home to naval bases for Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine declared independence from Russia in 1991. Crimea wants to rejoin Russia for nationalist and imperialist reasons. Russia is trying to gain control of Crimea again. After the Ukraine president fled, pro-Russian Crimeans held protests in the streets showing they wanted to secede from Ukraine. Crimean military surrounded Ukraine military bases in Crimea, where more than half the population is Russian. Assault troops…

    • 816 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tension in Ukraine began to rise when then the president Viktor Yanukovych rejected a deal proposed by the European Union regarding trade agreements. Late last year when this deal was in consideration, Viktor Yanukovych began to express his doubts in the final stages about signing the trade agreement. For everyone in Ukraine it was clear that Vladimir Putin pressured Viktor Yanukovych so much that essentially Putin made Yanukovych reject the deal. Just days later on 17th December Putin agrees to buy 9bn pounds of Ukraine’s debt and reduce the price of Russian gas supplies by about a third. Just hours after Yanukovych rejected EU’s proposal, thousands of protestors stormed the streets of Kiev calling for the immediate resignation of Yanukovych. The conflict quickly escalated with riot police, armed guards and military personnel getting involved. On February 21st Yanukovych fled to Russia after his residence was invaded by the protestors while also facing charges from the opposition for the killing of protestors. Shortly after Yanukovych disappearance to Russia, unmarked guards began appearing on the Ukrainian – Russian border. The unmarked military personnel were believed to be the Russian army carrying out military drills. The ‘unmarked soldiers’ quickly began to advance into Crimea. Before it was announced that a referendum will be held in Crimea concerning the peninsula becoming part of Russia once more, there have been a number of clashes between Russian and Ukrainian military. After an unsurprising outcome of the referendum in Crimea, Putin did not let up and kept sending military personnel to Crimea and Ukraine. Nothing has been established currently between Russia and Ukraine with clashes and conflicts still apparent in Kiev, Odessa and various other parts of Ukraine.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cold War and Ukraine

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the northern Eurasian steppes being extremely flat and easily traversable, Russia blossomed into one of the largest empires the world ha sever seen. Yet the importance and fierce fighting spirit of Russia has been formed by over five centuries of Tsar conquest. Its continual thirst for taking over the Eurasian Heartland has seemed to be the reason for the unification of the Slavic peoples, and it still continues today. The formation of the USSR in 1922 brought a scary force to the modern world; nearly 150 million people expanded over nearly 12% of land on earth. With advancements in recent technology brought nearly instant communication, a factor limiting many major empires from reaching their true potential. As Mackinder is quoted in Kaplan’s book “The Revenge of Geography,” he states that “Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland: Who rules the Heartland commands the…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays