Preview

Animals Have Rights Too

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animals Have Rights Too
Research Essay Outline

I. Introduction

A. Definition of animal rights-the belief that non-human animals have interests and rights similar to humans and deserve the same respect

B. Background information on the issue

C. The discussion of animal rights and whether or not animals deserve the same rights as humans has been prevalent in society since the early 1800s, but animals do reserve the same rights to a life free from the terror of being hunted and the pain of abuse and experimentation; therefore, the solution is to create more laws in favor of animals’ rights and to prosecute those who choose to ignore these laws.

II. History A. Research says each side tries to goad the other in an effort to undermine them B. Research says the side for animal rights has been fighting for their cause since the 19th century C. Opposition

III. Addressing the Issue
A. Research says animal rights activists have a valid point

B. Research says animal rights are not always enough

C. Opposition

IV. Animal Rights vs. Human Rights & Facts A. Research says animals have enough mental and emotional faculties to deserve the same rights as humans B. Research says the effort to preserve animal lives has been by and large very successful. C. Opposition

V. Conclusion A. Animals deserve the right to live their lives free from hunting, abuse and experimentation

B. Solution-stricter laws and harsher punishments

Animal Rights are defined as the belief that non-human animals have interests and rights similar to humans and deserve the same respect. Activists and activist groups such as PETA and the ASPCA have been fighting for the equal treatment of animals since the early 19th century and continue to do so in the present day. There are two sides to every argument and there are people who do not believe that animals deserve the same rights



Cited: Driscoll, Sally, and David C. Morley. "Point: Hunting Provides Numerous Benefits to Hunters, Wildlife, and the Environment." Points of View: Hunting (2009): 2. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010. Lee, M., and C. Ames Cushman. "Counterpoint: Animals Do Not Have Rights." Points of View: Animal Rights (2009): 3. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010. Rich, Alex K., and Geraldine Wagner. "Animal Rights: An Overview." Points of View: Animal Rights (2009): 1. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010. Whittaker, Anne, and David C. Morley. "Point: Endangered Species Should be Protected." Points of View: Endangered Species (2009): 2. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010. Witherbee, Amy. "Counterpoint: When Animal Rights are Not Enough." Points of View: Animal Rights (2009): 6. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan's Position

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An Argumentative essay that looks at and breaks down the philosophical difference between Tom Regan’s position on Animal rights and, Peter Singer’s position on Animal liberation as a basis for better treatment of animals.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    James, Missy and Merickel, Alan P. Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook, The Evil of Animal “Rights”, Reading Literature and Writing Argument, Fourth Edition by, pg. 604-605.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the authors of this piece, animal rights activists are “terrorists” (Epstein 604). The authors attack the topic of animal testing with strong language from the very beginning of the text, and do not let up through the end. Word choice throughout the piece tends to be a bit overboard. Although examples are given to illustrate the violent acts performed by certain rights protesters, the authors imply that all supporters of animal rights behave in this manner. Committing crimes in the name of a cause is morally wrong and illegal, no matter the circumstance. For an animal rights supporter to threaten lab employees or cause property damage or injury is not acceptable. Leading the audience to believe animal rights activists are brutal criminals alienates any reader who might be a supporter of this movement. Once the reader is offended, the message the authors are trying to deliver is lost.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals contribute in many ways to our world. We seem to take for granted the benefits animals can have on us. The benefits animals have on our earth shouldn’t be taken for granted. Without animals, our earth would not receive the essential nutrients it needs to flourish. Establishing animal rights will give animals the love and respect that they’ve always deserved. Animal are not pieces of meat, they are a vital resource to the nutriment of our earth. We have been given the power to protect animals and give them rights of their own. We should not ignore the needs of animals. Animals have benefited us in ways no human can. It is our moral duty as humans to take a stand for animals and give them the rights they deserve. At this very moment animals are being abused and carelessly slaughtered. Now is the time to end the abuse of animals and give them the rights that benefits us…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    All animals should have the right to roam freely without being pursued and/or killed. Hunters cause injuries, pain and suffering to defenseless animals, they destroy their families and home, and leave…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animals from creation have been an essential integral part of human beings. They have frequently been, either directly or indirectly, used by humans to achieve their needs. Hence they are important part and great asset to humans. These animals do have lives different from that of humans and equally have some similar characteristics with humans like emotional feelings. This very fact puts humans in a difficult position of determining the amount of respect and regard that should be accorded to the animals. Some people agitate that animals should be granted same equal rights as human beings. Inasmuch as I quite agree that animals should be granted some rights in order to be free from cruel treatments by humans, the issue of granting them equal full rights as enjoyed by humans should not come up. An objective review of such factors as tradition, cultural believes, religious, socio-economic, and medical as well as salient natural features that distinguish animals from humans like morality, and ability to…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should not have rights also because animals don’t respect our rights. As humans if one…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rich, Alex & Wagner Geraldine (2011), p1-1, 1p Points of View: Animal Rights: An Overview.…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Rights Definition

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Definition- Animal rights are the philosophy of allowing non-human animals to have the most basic rights that all sentient beings desire: the freedom to live a natural life free from human exploitation, unnecessary pain and suffering, and premature death.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Bill Of Rights

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Now in my opinion, I believe that animals should have an official “Bill of Rights”. They have emotions and show signs of intelligence. I believe that we need to draft a legal “Bill of Rights” for animals. Simple laws should be, and already are, in place to protect animals to some extent but there is more that could be done. Currently, the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) remains the only federal law that regulates the treatment of animals [1]. I believe that the AWA is enough protection for animals, we don’t need additional legislation on top of this and similar…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals don't have rights because animals do not have the cognitive ability or moral judgment that humans do and because of this they have been treated differently than humans by nearly every culture throughout recorded history. Also if we granted animals rights, all humans would have to become vegetarians, and hunting would need to be outlawed. Therefore if animals had rights then we wouldn’t be able to hunt the animals so that means that the animals would overpopulate and we would die. My last reason why animals don't have rights is because animals are wild and would wreck towns or states. Those are some reasons why animals don't and shouldn't have rights.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Hasselstrom, Linda. "The Cow Versus The Animal Rights Activist." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 327-34. Print.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals Deserve No Rights

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary: Nowadays, with an increasing number of reports about animal cruelty coming into the public view, an agitation about protecting animal right caught our attention. As far as I 'm concerned, quite a few people believe that excluding non-human animals from the range of concern but to include all humans just seems arbitrary and unreasonable. However an overwhelming number of people still share the same idea with me that animals don 't deserve rights. At first glance, my assertion that animals deserve no rights, seems to be inhumane to ignore the pain of animals. Nonetheless you 'll find the reasonable idea comes from a tight though then. From the pragmatic standpoint, you 'll find animal experiment indispensable. Besides, animals aren 't in possession of the ingredients that a rights owning man should have. Taking these into consideration, we can see that it 's irrational to give animals rights.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics