Animal Testing Should be Banned
Experiments on animals has been done all around the world since many years ago throughout the history. There are reasons behind these experiments; such as gaining knowledge about the animals themselves, education, research and developments for the benefit of human being. In the last reason fall substances and procedures tests; such as for cosmetic products, medicines, and surgical techniques; to see if they are harmful to humans or not. Many experiments that has been conducted involved quite some numbers of animals, with the majority of them being euthanized at the end of the research period. Not to mention a lot of misconducted researches, the law to protect animals from being used for testing, the rate of success in comparison of animal and human, and the existence of other alternatives to conduct research and testing for the same purposes. This became a problem for some people, as they think that it is not acceptable to conduct animal testing, especially for such thing as cosmetic products that is technically has no correlation between the animals and the continuance of human life.
Many people think that scientists are doing every experiments that are necessary to make human lives better. That includes animal testing, which is approved by many people, as they believe that those tests are necessary. That thought is not wrong, but it's not exactly right too. Nowadays there are some cases of misconducted research done by scientists with totally irrelevant basis. According to Massachusetts Animal Rights Coalition (n.d.), Harvard researchers perform some unnecessary and inhumane procedures at the New England Regional Primate Research Center, such as destroying areas of the brains of live monkeys with chemicals, injecting foreign genes and substances into the monkeys, performed some unsuccessful transplantation between two different species, and many more. Those are some examples of irrelevant and inhumane...
References: Killing Animals and Humans. (2012). In AnimalAid. Retrieved December 5, 2012, from: http://www.animalaid.org.uk/h/n/CAMPAIGNS/experiments/ALL/730/
Primates are Suffering...... in Harvard Labs. (n.d.). In MassachusettsAnimalRightsCoalition. Retrieved December 5, 2012, from: http://www.massanimalrights.org/harvardprimateflier.html
Code of Federal Regulations. (2009, January 1). In AnimalWelfareInformationCenter. Retrieved December 5, 2012, from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2009-title9-vol1/xml/CFR- 2009-title9-vol1-chapI-subchapA.xml
Alternatives to Animal Testing. (n.d.). In PETA. Retrieved December 5, 2012, from: http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/alternatives-to-animal- testing.aspx
Product Testing: Toxic and Tragic. (n.d.). In PETA. Retrieved December 5, 2012, from: http://www.peta.org/issues/Animals-Used-for-Experimentation/product-testing-toxic- tragic.aspx
Alternatives: Testing Without Torture. (n.d.). In PETA. Retrieved December 5, 2012, from: http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/alternatives-testing- without-torture.aspx
Is Animal Testing Better Than Pure Guesswork? (2010). In VivisectionInformationNetwork. Retrieved December 5, 2012, from: http://www.vivisectioninformation.com/index.php? p=1_5_Is-animal-testing-better-than-pure-guesswork
Please join StudyMode to read the full document