Over the past five decades, public support for animal testing has declined tremendously. Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs. In my opinion, I do not support animal testing because there are better ways to conduct experiments, rather than using animals. Generally, there are the pros and cons of animal testing. However we can maintain animal rights. In my presentation, I will discuss them with supporting reasons include explanations and examples.
There are many pros to animal testing. First of all, animal testing is said to be done in order to save human lives by using new drugs and medical procedures. Scientists will inject a lab animal with a virus like AIDS or cancer, and then try to cure them. If it works on a lab animal, they will have developed a new cure. The followers of animal testing disagree that if animal testing is eliminated, that many of the medications and procedures that we currently use today wouldn't be present and the expansion of future treatments would be enormously restricted (“Animal Testing,” 2005). For example, more than 100,000 people have been hospitalized and later died from toxic reactions to medications in 1994 that were not predicted by animal tests (“Animal Testing Facts,” n.d.).
In addition, animal experiment not only profit humans but also helps other animals. If we did not have medical animal many lives would be lost. Animal Testing plays an important role in today economy if we do not have it many people would lose their jobs, and lives. For instance, the heartworm medication that was devised from research on animals has assisted many dogs (“Animal Testing,” 2005). Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University tested similarities between rats and mice, and found that only 30% of the time, a drug that cures a disease in rats cures the same disease in mice (“Animal Testing Facts,” n.d.). On the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document