Animal Testing Controversy Essay

Controversies pop up everywhere. From ear clipping to the Confederate flag, everyone get’s offended in some way. What about a federal organization whose job is to protect the public? The following is a report based on facts that led to certain conclusions for both sides. It talks about the controversy revolving around the Food and Drug Administration and its relationship with animals. It brings up the idea that maybe we value animal’s lives less than our own and the hierarchy which has become earth. Although there are some flaws in the way that the FDA regulates animals, there is also proof that they are putting in some sort of effort. From food to animal testing, there are many ways in which the FDA can come across some sort of backlash. The question remains; does the FDA protect animals?
The CVM’s main role is to protect both the animal’s and the public health by regulating veterinary medicine and medicated feed. Regulation of animals before they are sold to the public for consumption is also a priority that falls to the CVM. It can be argued that the FDA is protecting animals by regulating feed and what they are getting for medications and vaccines. In turn, this increases the quality of the feed with more valuable nutrition than if it were unregulated; causing less health problems than food that is not being inspected and meeting FDA requirements. By not using unnecessary medications, there would be less of a risk of drug resistance. On the other side of the discussion, you could argue that although the FDA may have a specific organization working towards regulating animal drugs and medicated feed, their main goal is to maintain public health. They have regulations on food, but only to the point where it does not specifically harm the animals. In their eyes, as long as it doesn’t cause illness or death to the animal or the public who may be ingesting the animal, it is good