Preview

Animal Rights Pros and Cons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Rights Pros and Cons
Name : Muhammad Jausha Bakkas (3A)
Topic : Animal Rights Pros and con
Introduction
Hook
Some people keep arguing about animal rights because of it is animal rights cannot work properly, there is still not clear caused and with it can be worked. Each side pros and con have a strong comprehension about agreeing and not agree with animal rights. This makes more interesting by the fact, side of pros with animal rights, it has more vote voice than the opposite. However, it does not make any difference to the animal rights. So, that must be an obstacle or something that wedge up animal rights to get working properly.
Connecting Information
Animal kind are complex subjects, people must reconsider their actions upon animal there something wrong and not, this statement brings rational argument if many of us feel for the animal it will be difficult, since we need to use them in certain ways. Most of animal activist work in preventing cruel thing in animal however there some people begging for more acting.
Purpose
According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), there is something morally that are not allowed to do upon animals, since it is cruel to hurt an animal since it absolutely can feel the pain. But on the other hand, human is a partial chain of food, means eating animal is normal for human, that is not a mistake for people to kill certain animals to keep on living. So, speaking this diverse statements has a strong comprehension, that makes animal rights hard to convey whether statements are good become the basis for work.

Thesis
Animal rights are rules of normative for the animals. So, this paper make for giving an advanced solution to the pros and con among animal rights. In order to prevent people left in the dark, there are some suggestions not only ending these animal rights pros and cons, it is giving animal right win-win solution way out. Furthermore, giving a better solution work for both animal and human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Why should the rights that were fought for by our late independent heroes and civil right activists be extended to non-human animals that could not socially speak for themselves? Since animals do not have the capacity to personally fight for their rights, granting what humans had put in their blood for to enjoy to non-human animals will be a scenario of robbing Peter to pay Paul and hence an injustice to humans. Therefore animal rights movement is simply a misguided attempt to force people to grant animals the same qualities, needs and desires as human beings. While this movement is born out of kindness and sympathy, I think it is completely misguided because non-human animals are in actual sense, equal to human beings and hence do not deserve equal right as enjoyed by human…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Rights Definition

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Proponents of animal welfare seek to alleviate the suffering of animals while they are being exploited -- without attempting to question the fundamental basis of whether it is acceptable to exploit animals in the first place. Animal rights beliefs reject the idea that animals need to have a value to the human species in order to be deserving of rights. A person can work for both animal welfare and animal rights.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taking a Stand Against Peta

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Animal rights debater Stephen R. L. Clark points out, “As humans, we are like the other animals and unlike them, tied to them and separate, in many ways,” (Golding). For example, humans are animals, our nature is an animal nature, our desires are, for the most part, animal desires, and our habit of hunting is like that of other animals. However, what sets us apart from other animals is the fact that we have legal rights (the right to vote) and moral rights (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness). The distinction must be made that animals obviously can't have the same rights as humans, because their interests are not always the same as ours, and some rights would be irrelevant to animals. For instance, an animal such as a cat doesn't have an interest in voting and, therefore, doesn't have the right to vote because that right would be as meaningless…

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal rights is a completely different matter. In its most extreme version, animal rights is the idea that animals are entitled to the same rights and freedoms as humans. (“Animal Rights” Current issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 1 Nov. 2011 ) People who defend animal rights say its wrong for humans to make any use of animals. Those who are animal activists say its wrong to eat meat, where…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal rights are one of the most controversial issues today. There has been endless debate about whether or not animals have rights. Philosophers attempt to come up with the moral conclusions by taking in account the many different standpoints and presenting their related arguments. In his essay “The case of animal rights”, Tom Regan, a professor of philosophy at North Carolina State University, defends his view that the center of our moral concern should not bring the suffering on animal as well as treating animals in a certain way. In other words, we should treat animals as if they are our property. We should only use them to benefit us and hurting them is an action that is not morally justifiable. In addition, in his article “All Animal Are Equal”, Peter Singer, an Australian philosopher, has many points which show us that we have responsibilities to protect animal rights. Singer’s argument in his essay gives us a great support to the argument that Reagan trying to discuss in terms of morally equal. In contrast, “The case of the use of animals in biomedical research” by Carl Cohen, a philosophy professor at University of Michigan Medical School, although he agrees with Regan’s idea in terms of moral rights as well as practices that essentially involve harming animals are morally unjustified, he strongly supports for the use of animal in medical research, and scientific experiments to avoid risking human lives. “The case of animal rights”, “all animal are equal” and “The case of the use of animals in biomedical research” introduce to us a new thinking about treating animals.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history morality has been a topic of intense debate. Innumerable thinkers have devoted immense amounts of time and energy to the formulation of various ethical theories intended to assist humans in their daily lives. These theories set out guidelines which help to determine the rightness or wrongness of any given action and can therefore illuminate which choice would be morally beneficial. And while many of these theories differ substantially, most have at least one common underlying principle, namely that humans deserve to be treated with a certain level of respect. This idea comes from the belief that all humans have interests which are significant enough to be considered, hence no one should impede another from fulfilling their own individual interests. Yet recently a new controversy has emerged at the forefront of ethical debate, the status of animals within our distinctly human-oriented world. For thousands of years man has used animals as nothing more than a mere means, raising and slaughtering them for food, hunting them for food as well as sport, and more recently using them as test subjects to ensure an assortment of products are safe for use by humans. However, as time has passed and the overall level of enlightenment within our societies has increased, many have begun to question these aforementioned practices, maintaining that animals, like humans have interests and therefore should have the ability to seek the satisfaction inherent in attaining those interests. The answer reached in regards to this question varies immensely depending on the specific ethical theory utilized. Some theories dictate that only humans should receive moral consideration, while other wish to extend this consideration towards not only animals but inanimate objects as well. For the purpose of this essay I will examine the issue of animal rights from both a utilitarian and a Kantian perspective. I intend to show that ultimately a utilitarian outlook is…

    • 3188 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal rights supporters believe that it is morally wrong to use or exploit animals in any way and that human beings should not do so. Animal welfare supporters believe that it can be morally acceptable for human beings to use or exploit animals, as long as the suffering of the animals is either eliminated or reduced to the minimum. For people who think like this, the suffering to animals is at the heart of the issue, and reducing the suffering reduces the wrong that is done. Supporters of animal rights don 't think that doing wrong things humanely makes them any less wrong. Do animals need rights?…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Rights

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    England in 1824 was formed there has been long running debates on the topic of…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The controversial process of how animals are treated has existed for many generations, up to now we have been unsuccessful in reaching an understanding. Even in religion people have different views "Jainism, which enjoins ahimsa ("noninjury") [sic] toward all living things, and Buddhism, which forbids the needless killing of animals […].traditional Judaism and Christianity taught that animals were created by God for human use,." (Encyclopedia Britannica) There are many different opinions some say that "Animals […] lack this capacity for free moral judgment. They are not beings of a kind capable of exercising or responding to moral claims. Animals therefore have no rights, and they can have none."( Cohen,…

    • 2401 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Illegal Commercial Whaling

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal rights have evolved over the years but still carry the same ideas and values as they did decades ago which is important in today’s society. According to the SIRS researcher website, to ensure the wellbeing of animals the Animal Welfare Act was signed into law in 1966. If the act was never passed then we would still be in the dark ages, using animals as disposable resources. The domesticated animals such as dogs and cats that we keep in our home that we love and take pride in wouldn’t be protected if not for the fact. Animal Rights advocates believe animals are not property nor should they be used for food, clothing, experimentation or entertainment. Animals are a part of nature and should be preserved rather than poached. Sharing many of the same ideals activists created animal conservation organizations. PETA was founded in 1980 with one hundred members, today there are over 750,000 members. These organizations are important in animal conservation efforts. The advocates represent the animals that cannot speak…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rights of Animals

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When we say that all human beings, referring to both men and women, whatever their race or sex may be are created equal, what is it that we are actually proclaiming? Peter Singer, writer of “All Animals are Equal” aims to advocate to us as readers to make the mental switch in respect to our attitudes toward a species other than our own. And by this I am referring to animals. R.G Frey takes on a very different position that he expresses in “Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Specieism.” Although there is nothing in his work that has ever suggested that animals don’t count, he disagrees with Singer, in a way, because he does not believe that animals possess moral standing.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movement for animal rights, which is also known as animal liberation, is the concept that the basic interests of animals should be regarded with an equal eye as with humans. It promotes the fact that animal should not be treated as public property, traded or be made a part of any business transaction, but they should be treated as legal persons, with their own rights. According to the Utilitarianism view, right is what will promote the greatest possible happiness of the greatest possible number happiness.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A delivery plan has been published under the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition Government (2010-2015) to reinforce the protection of animal research, keep the suffering to a minimum and promoting the understanding and awareness about the use of animals where no alternative exists. Animal right are also a big debate inside this community. Although people may defend their rights, they need to be aware of what it means. Accepting the “doctrine” of animal right leads to; no experiments on animals, no breeding and killing animals for food, clothes or medicine, no use of animals for hard labor, no selective breeding for any reason other than the benefit of the animal, no hunting, no zoos or use of animals in entertainment. These are the reasons why the debate is still present and why the governments will never fully approve animals’ rights.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Right to Life

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Animal rights imply that an animal has a right to their own life just as we do; that they are not property of Humans. To an extremist, this argument also means we must maintain a vegetarian diet, not wear leather or fur and not keep animals as pets. A moderate animal rights activist would say that our responsibility toward animals is that we have a moral and ethical obligation not to cause then unnecessary pain. We often talk about right or wrong treatment of animals but do not really understand what goes on behind the scenes. Many non-profit organizations such as PETA care and try to participate in the animal rights initiatives and spread the knowledge about needs and rights of those who cannot protect themselves from dominant and often cruel human behavior. There are many types of animal cruelty that occur everyday.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays