Preview

Animal Experimentation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
783 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Experimentation
Animal Experimentation has Alternatives
Every day around the world, animals are fighting for their lives. They are being mutilated and confined to tiny cages so we can use them. They are being burned, blinded, poisoned, and cut up alive just for science. They are electrocuted and strangled just so people can wear makeup. The fact that animal testing can be done in other ways makes this suffering pointless. Scientists should use alternative testing instead of harming animals.
Animals are abused every day in medical research and experimentation. Animals are infected with diseases they wouldn’t normally contract. Tiny mice grow tumors as large as their own bodies so scientists can do research on cancer. Kittens are purposely blinded to test different mixtures of chemicals. Rats are made to suffer seizures, and primates' skulls are cut open and electrodes are implanted in them. Scientists force-feed chemicals to animals, conduct repeated surgeries on them, implant wires in their brains, crush their spines, and much more. After enduring these terrifying, painful procedures, animals are then usually dumped back into a cage without any painkillers. Video footage from inside laboratories shows animals who cower in fear every time someone walks by their cages. Animals in research labs are exposed to substances that can irritate their skin and cause birth defects, cancer and even death. Lab animals often live in small wire cages with little room to move around. Often they see other animals killed right in front of them. After the experiments are finished animals are often put to death.
Not only do animals suffer, but sometimes the experiments don’t work. Animals don’t always react the same way as humans would. “In 2006, scientists in London, England, injected six human volunteers with an experimental treatment for rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. Though the drug had been tested on mice, rats, rabbits, and monkeys with no obvious problems, the humans had a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sally Porter

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States fir various types of testing. These animals are used for scientific and commercial testing to develop medical treatments, determine toxicity of medications and chemicals, check the safety of products destined for human use and other biomedical or healthcare purposes. This testing on animals is cruel, inhumane and should be banned. It should be banned because the animals are held and live in inhumane conditions, it is harmful and at times lethal to the animals and there are other research method available that do not require animal testing.…

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is all due to the simple fact that “animals of different ages, sexes, developmental stages and of different health status can all respond differently to experimental treatments.” (“Animal Testing”). Even with all of the perils, scientists persist on risking the health of patients by relying on animal experiments to foretoken the outcome of drugs in Homo sapiens. A major drug mishap happened in March 13, 2006. The drug was called TGN1412 it was created to treat B cell chronic lymphocyte leukemia and rheumatoid arthritis. Eight volunteers were given small doses in the Northwick Park Hospital in London. They became seriously ill and had to be placed in intensive care. Four suffered multiple organ dysfunction and one person showed signs of cancer, the last three either died or fell into a coma. (Saunders). Another example is the first attempt at heart lung transplants that were supposedly ‘perfected’ on animals. The first three humans died within 23 days. Of the 28 operated on from 1981 to 1085, 8 died peri-operatively and 10 developed a lung complication that didn’t show up in the dogs who were experimented on. Of those ten, four died and three never breathed again without the aid of a respirator. (50 Disasters). Finally, Vioxx from Merck, this drug alone killed more Americans than all the ones who died bravely in the Vietnam War, yet it was deemed safe in eight studies using six animals species (Erbe). These are not the only drugs that have cause human fatalities; many other drugs have had severe and even lethal effects in people after demonstrating safety in animal…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    First off, throughout the history of testing on animals, many human lives have been lost due to inaccuracies that have occurred during animal testing. There have been many cases where an animal showed no side effects when subjected to a specific medication. When that same medication was tested on humans, however, the reaction was completely different. Take the antidiarrheal drug, Clioquinol, for example. At the time of its release, this drug not only passed tests on rats and dogs, but in cats and rabbits as well. None of the animals were said to have experienced any adverse side effects. However, humans reacted in an entirely different manner. Clioquinol caused blindness and even paralysis in many of its…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These experiments do not serve a legitimate purpose in society. Elias states in her article, “The problem is that animal testing hasn’t worked, and its time we stopped dancing around the problem”(Tatchell1). The experiments have not been working yet scientists are still doing them. It is not accurate and most of the time the effects are different on animals and humans. “Animals have different responses to products and medicines that differ from humans, so tests they do on animals aren’t as accurate as if they used a computer stimulation”(Elena1), states Elena in her…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is common knowledge that many animals are used in medical and scientific research. These innocent animals are often obliged to undergo countless of cruel processes and endure great suffering as a result. Despite all the disputes and discussions regarding whether or not animal testing is actually necessary, they wouldn't change the fact that it is, in fact, an extremely cruel thing to do.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Animal Testing

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use is up. Some are injured and will still live the remainder of their life in captivity. The doctors will not do anything to help the animals that are in pain that happen to be the reason because of them. It is the aspect of animals testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred. Even though animals and humans have many things in common like how we both have the same organ system, there are also many things that are different between animals and humans. Many animals cannot handle or take the same medication as humans, most the surgeries that are operated on animals are just too strong for an animal to take so they end up dying or sick for the rest of their lives. (Animal Testing…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Flaws

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The UDSA reported that in 2010 that there was 97,123 animals that went through pain during experiments and weren’t given anaesthesia for pain relief (“Should animals”). A former Maryland secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene, Martin Wasserman has said “Animals used in chemical testing-always alive and fully concencious-are never given pain relief (“Is animal”). Though, it has been argued that animal testing is better than putting human lives in danger. However, even though products or drugs have been tested on animals it doesn’t work on people. Neurologist Aysha Akktar has said that would about more than 100 stroke drugs that passed animal trials have failed to work on humans (“Should animals”). Proceeding of the National Academy of sciences in the United States studied that around 150 human tests have failed even though it was tested on animals (“Should animals”). In addition to suffering and deaths animals go through the results of animal and human clinics can have different…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One could also say that the close genetic similarity shared between testing animals and humans also attributes to altogether accurate results (“Animal”). On the contrary, this testing is not always reliable, and the impacts can be devastating. In the 1950s, a sleeping pill was released, claiming to be safe for pregnant women (“Science”). The result was 10,000 infants born with limb deformities. The end results of the pill were completely contradictory to the results of the animal tests. The formula was tested on pregnant mice, rats, cats, and hamsters, and still proved to be safe. Similarly, Vioxx, an arthritis medication, was tested on mice, and proved to protect the animal’s heart, as it should. But, the pill caused 27,000 heart related deaths, and heart attacks (“Animal”). This further illustrates that the difference in genetics between humans and animals makes animal testing not as reliable as some may…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is it wrong to experiment on animals for our own benefit? Many may disagree and believe its immoral and shouldnt be done. Science and manufacturing need animal experimentation to prevent harm to humans because it helps to develope cures for disease and to save humans from experimentation.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Approximately, more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year (Humane Society International, 2010). Animals, from the fruit fly to the mouse, are widely used in scientific research. Research is critical for the advancement of medicine, leading to increased chances of survival from diseases and improved strategies to prevent them. Without animal experiments, transplants, diseases, cancer, and vaccines would not have been advanced. The use of animals can be inevitable, particularly in conditions that require first-hand understanding of biochemical processes in and outside the body. Therefore, animals should be used for scientific research.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most households today have a beloved cat, dog, rabbit, fish, or other pet of some sort that they unconditionally care for and protect. What if your pet had ended up in a laboratory, forced to undergo painful experiments, instead of in your care? Unfortunately, that has been the fate of millions of animals every year dating back since before the nineteenth century. Researchers believe they are helping people by putting animals through these cruel experiments, but it has been proven that most of the results end up being incorrect in human trials. Billions of dollars are being provided to medical universities, institutes, and companies for…

    • 2066 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The animals in labs are also often treated appallingly even before any cruel testing is carried out. They are often abused by their captors, starved and imprisoned in small, rotten cages.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persuasive Animal Testing

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For a long period of time, scientists have tested on animals in order to develop information about the human body. However, there have been many complaints from people about animal experimentation who say it is disastrous for animals. Recent studies have said that most animals don't come out of testing 100% the way they were before the testing. Animals have suffered from emotional and physical traumas, and possibly death during the procedures. On the other hand, some people say the testing has contributed to life-saving cures for humans and also animals. Although this may be true, testing on animals can be harmful and painful for an animal to go through, and since animals aren't similar to humans, animals can be deprived of their lives when it comes to animal experimentation.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When considering the pain some animals are put through in order to test certain medical techniques, we mustn't forget that if it were not animals going through the pain, it would be humans. Also, the amount of successful outcomes of medical testing far outweighs the failures. The California Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. Experiments in which dogs had their pancreases removed led directly to the discovery of insulin, critical to saving the lives of diabetics. Also, the polio vaccine, tested on animals, reduced the global occurrence of the disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 223 cases in 2012. Lastly, animals covered under the “Animal Welfare Act include any live or dead cat, dog, hamster, rabbit, nonhuman primate, guinea pig, and any other warm-blooded animal determined by the Secretary of Agriculture for research, pet use or exhibition”(Animal Welfare Act of 1966). Animal research is highly regulated, with laws in place to protect animals from mistreatment. As well as stipulating minimum housing standards for research animals, the AWA also requires regular inspection by veterinarians. This nearly guarantees the safety of Animal Research labs and makes sure that they treat their animals with the utmost…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays