Top-Rated Free Essay
Alunte’ Edwards
April 10, 2013
Sean Burres
CMPT1100
Research Draft 1

Ban Animal Experimenting With the exact number unknown, the USDA reports more than 100 million animals every year suffer and die in cruel chemical, drug, food and cosmetic tests, biology lessons, medical training exercises and curiosity-driven medical experiments. Each year animals are subjected to experiments so painful and damaging that no one would ever do on any human being. As experimenting on animals is immoral we should stop using animals for experiments. Animal experimentation, also known as animal testing, animal research, and in vivo testing is the use of non-human animals in experiments. Animal testing is very cruel. Animals are kept in boxes or cages that they can barely move in. They are tested to what substance cause pain, stress or even both. Animal testing kills about 50 percent of animals and the others end up injured. United States laws allows animals to be drowned, poisoned, addicted to drugs, isolated, starved, shocked, burned, and brain damaged. Animals are infected with diseases that they would not normally contract, tiny mice grow tumors as large as their own bodies, kittens are purposely blinded, rats are made to suffer seizures and primates skulls are cut open and electrodes are implanted in them. Experimentators force-feed chemicals to animals, conduct repeated surgeries on them, implant wires in their brains, crush their spines, and much more. After enduring these terrifying, painful procedures, animals are then usually dumped back into a cage without any painkillers. No experiment, no matter how painful or trivial is prohibited and painkillers are not required. Animals languish in pain, ache with loneliness and long to roam free and use their minds. Experimenting on animals should be illegal around the country; it is only cruelty to innocent animals. In the United States, The Animal Welfare Act appears to set minimum requirements for the humane treatment of non-human animals in labs and other settings, but in fact is very effective. Animals have rights. Animal rights is the idea that some or all non-human animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives, and that their most basic interest- such as an interest in not suffering- should be afforded the same consideration as the similar interests of human beings. “Non-human animals have interests and those interests ought not to be discriminated against on the basis of species membership alone” –Khaliah Eglington, chief executive of the Dr. Hadwen and RSPCA senior scientist. Just as humans do not experiment on humans who are incapable of consenting to experimentation, humans should not experiment on non-human animals. Non-human animals can not inform content. Animals cannot talk for their selves but humans can. Humans should take a stand and talk for the animals and see the pain they are going through and put a stop to it. Humans believe animals have the right to not to be exploited as experimental subjects, but humans also convince that animal research harms humans by diverting research dollars that should be going to prove methods of curing diseases. Animals are dying and suffering in laboratories every day. However, regardless of how large the cages are or whether the animals are anesthetized before they are cut open, vivisection is esthetical to animal rights because animals have a right to be free from experimentation, imprisonment, and killing. Studies in esteemed publications such as the Journal of the American Medical Association and the British Medical Journal have repeatedly concluded that because of the fundamental biological differences among species, animal tests do not reliably predict outcomes in humans. Animals’ tests are not reliable. Animals are being killed and suffered to try new products out for humans when humans and animals are dissimilar. Medicine or a cosmetic ingredient that is safe on animals may not be on people or vise-versa. For example, aspirin is toxic to mice and rats but not to human beings. 92 out of 100 drugs that pass animal tests is a failure to humans. Science and technology moves faster than research protocols. Non-animal methods usually take less time to complete than the crude, archaic animal tests that they replace. The replacement of animal testing and experimentation with non-animal technique often yields both ethical and technical disadvantages. There are various alternative sciences that are created so animal testing can end. The world has changed drastically and now has updated technology. Instead of cutting an damaging the brains of rats, cats, and monkeys progressive researchers who are interested in studying the human brain are using advanced human based brain-imaging and regarding techniques such as MRI, fMRI, EEG, CT, and PET. These moderns techniques allows the human brain to be safely studied down to the level of a single neuron, and researchers can even temporarily and reversibly induce brain disorders using transcranial megnetical stimulators. Not only do these techniques eliminate the use of animals, the obstacle of interspecies extrapolation, they also provide rich data about the human brain that could not be ascertained through the use of animals. Non-animal research methods would include human-based micro dosing in vitro technology, human patient stimulators, and sophisticated computer modeling. Instead of using non-volunteering animals, scientists could use volunteering humans. Discontinuing animal testing would leave innocent animals alive and safe. Animal testing is killing and causing harm to numerous of innocent animals around the world. Scientists use animals to test cosmetics, medicines, and lots of other products humans use each and every day. Many labs are burning, shocking, torturing, and starving animals without any pain relief. There should be more enforced and strict laws against animal experimenting. There should be a change and make all animal research illegal.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Banning Animal Testing

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The number of animal tests rose from 1,566,944 in 1997 to 2,705,722 from the Journal of Medical Ethics. Animal Experimentation is when animals are used for scientific research and to test certain products. Scientists have used this method for a number of years and rely on it to be the most adequate way. However, it may not be the most accurate way of testing. Animal Testing has gotten more popular since the late 1900s. Many different types of animals are used in research, some of them are not practical…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing on cosmetics should be banned. People are put in jail all the time for abusing their pets, but people are never put in jail for inhumane testing of cosmetics and other pharmaceuticals on these same animals. I have done a lot of research on animal testing and methods we can use that are more effective and don’t use animals through high school in my free time because of curiosity, so I know a lot of random facts about the harmful nature of this and alternative methods. Animals are being…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Animal Testing Improve Our Modern World? Animal testing should be demolished and completely banned from our world. Experimentation on animal is simply barbaric, immoral, and does not provide viable and trustworthy information. Imagine being in that little animal’s shoes seized from your parents and home. Placed in a cage. Harassed, tossed and jabbed with a million different things everyday that only make you feel pain. How would you feel? Why should animals stay in cages for the rest…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    over the country is "change or repeal the Second Amendment." The Second Amendment is one of the reasons we have more guns than any country on the planet. Some people believe that banning guns will decrease the number of crimes committed in the United States because they believe guns are the roots of all crime, and banning guns will decrease the murder rates and give everyone a peace of mind. While others believe that abolishing guns would not change anything. People would still get murdered, robbers…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Fireworks

    • 973 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Banning Fireworks Roberto Diaz COMM/172 January 10, 2012 Dr. January Riddle Banning Fireworks. Fireworks are used for special events in the whole world, a lot of people have unlimited access to buy fireworks. When special events are coming up people get excited to watch fireworks exploding in the sky. Some people do not realize fireworks are dangerous in many ways. Something good I can tell about fireworks is, when I was a child I used to play with fireworks, and it was funny to watch them…

    • 973 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Books

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    attempt to take books off the shelves of school libraries. Banning books takes away our privilege, as American citizens, to read what we want (Source 1). If people are offended by a book, depriving the entire state of their ability to read that certain book is not the solution. There are various other ways to ensure that parents who do not want their children to read particular books without abolishing them from the entire school. Banning books from schools restrains students from their first amendment…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Banning of Handguns

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The banning of handguns can ultimately be a good thing in regards to lowering the count of handguns in circulation but can also be harmful when ideas such as less people being able to protect themselves against criminals. When the idea of the banning of handguns comes into play, it is expected for there to be both negatives and positives to the theory. What we must ultimately find out is which would be more likely to work and at what cost. Professor Daniel Polsby and Philosopher Nicholas Dixon both…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Books

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Banning Books Fredrick Douglass; an African American slave in the 1800’s, went through an immense amount of difficulties but was still able to find a way to teach himself to read and write with perseverance. Douglass realized a sad truth that, “…The same country that had enslaved him had fought a revolution in the name of freedom”(46). Some argue that certain books should be banned from schools and libraries due to their controversial references. Others believe that by doing so the government would…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Book banning

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today book banning is well known; we even have a book-banning week. Lots of books around the world are banned even though it violates first amendment rights. The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” If banning books encroaches on these…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    banning whaling

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Professor Subhamitra Adhikari Academic Writing B 13 December 2013 Banning whale hunting Whales are the biggest animals that live on this planet, in the oceans. Depending on their species they can weigh up to 200 tons, the weight of around 12 elephants or 2000 people. It has also been studied that the brains of whales are developed which means they are intelligent creatures. Since centuries whales have been hunted down for their oil and meat. The process of killing whales for their…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays