Preview

Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824
Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824
Introduction
In 17 March 1824, the Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824, which was also known as the Treaty of London, was signed by Hendrik Fagel and Anton Reinhard Falck for the Dutch, George Canning and Charles Watkin WIlliams Wynn for the UK. The purpose for signing the treaty was to address the issues faced when the British inhabits the Dutch properties during the Napoleonic Wars. The treaty was signed in London without the consent of local rulers.
Historical Background
Before the treaty was signed, there were conflicts between the British and the Dutch as they fought for trade monopoly in Southeast Asia. In 1819, a settlement on the Malaya Peninsular called Singapore was established by a British named Sir Stanford Raffles. As a result, it had drawn away much trade from Dutch ports which worsen the rivalry between the British and the Dutch. The Dutch, wanting the British to leave Singapore, had declared that the treaty signed by Raffles and The Sultan of Johore was invalid. Additional to the current issue, the Dutch had doubts regarding their rights in British India and their former establishment which also becoming a point of contention between Batavia and Culcutta. In 1820, by demand from the British merchant, who was interested in the Far East, negotiations with the Dutch was carried out to clarify the situation in Southeast Asia.
Terms of the Treaty
The terms of the Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824 includes: The British to be provided with trade access with the Maluku Islands, especially with Ambon, Banda and Ternate. The Dutch to surrender their settlements on the Indian sub-continent and also to give up any rights related to them. Besides, the Dutch also handed in the city and fort of Melacca to the British. On the other hand, the factory of Fort Marlborough in Bencoolen and all of the British property on the island of Sumatra were surrendered to the Dutch. In short, after the treaty was signed, Bencoolen and Indonesia belongs to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    encountered in Asia? The British and Dutch were both militarily and economically stronger than the Portuguese. They quickly over took and displaced the Portuguese. The British focused on India, while the Dutch focused on Indonesia. The British were largely excluded from the rich Spice Islands by the Dutch monopoly. They established three major trading settlements in Bombay, Calcautta, and Madias. They secured their trading posts with Mughal authorities or local rulers. The British mostly focused on Indian cotton textiles. The Dutch controlled the shipping and production of cloves, cinnamon, and mace. They seized control of a number of small spice-producing islands, where they forced people to sell only to the Dutch. If the people did not obey, their crops were destroyed. As a result of these actions the Dutch profits soared, but the local economies were shattered.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Threatened by the Dutch trading monopolies, France and England went to war with the Dutch and won. In all the Anglo-Dutch wars, the English defeated the Dutch and according to the "Estimated Losses to Merchant Shipping in Three Anglo - Dutch Wars 1652-1574", seized 2000-2700 ships, compared to the Dutch, who captured 500 ships. The Anglo-Dutch wars damaged the Dutch trade. According to “the Resolution of the Amsterdam City Council, 1671” the French and Other European kings' need to “take over part of it for themselves” increased, the urge for war in order to break the dutch monopoly and…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1793, the British government violated international law by ordering naval commanders to begin seizing any American ship that carried French goods or was sailing for a French port. By 1794, several Hundred American ships were confiscated. Choices were to Join the British navy or be imprisoned. The British also armed Indians to attack settlers. On April 16, 1794, Washington named John Jay as a special envoy to Great Britain. They made an agreement; Jay wanted them to settle all major issues: to get the British out of their forts along the Great Lakes, to secure reparations for the losses of American shippers, compensation for southern slaves carried away by British ships in 1783, and a new commercial treaty that would legalize American trade with the British West Indies. Jay accepted the British definition of neutral rights – that exports of tar, pitch and other products needed for warships were contraband and that such military products could not go in neutral ships to enemy ports – and the “rule of 1756” prevailed, meaning that trade was prohibited in peacetime because of mercantilist restrictions could not be opened in wartime. Britain also gained most-favored-nation treatment in American commerce and a promise that French privateers would not be outfitted in American ports. Finally, Jay conceded that the British need not compensate U.S. Citizens for the enslaved people who have escaped during the war and that the pre-Revolutionary American debts to the British merchants would be paid by the U.S. Government. In return, Jay won three important points: British evacuation of their six northwestern forts by 1796, reparations for the seizures of American ships and cargo in 1793 – 1794, and the right of American…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jay’s Treaty is an agreement between John Jay, U.S. chief justice, special envoy, and William Grenville, a British foreign secretary. Signed in London, England, on November 19, 1794, and ratified by the U.S. Congress in 1795 the Treaty settled disagreements and distress between the United States and Great Britain. Both countries had unresolved issues remaining since violations occurred from the Treaty of Paris of 1783. England refused to evacuate the frontier forts in the Northwest Territory; and in addition seized American ships forcing American soldiers to participate in England’s war with France. The United States passed navigation laws that were to potentially damage England. It was because the commercial war between…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pinckney’s Treaty (174)- It was a treaty between the United States and Spain. Thomas Pinckney represented the United States at the signing of the treaty. It gave the Americans free navigation of the Mississippi River. It gave the land north of Florida (Mississippi and Alabama) to America that had been in dispute. It required Spanish authorities to prevent the Indians from raiding across the border along the 31st parallel. It also gave western farmers the right of deposit in New Orleans, making it easier for them to get their goods to the east.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    …but in the process of mercantilism, colonial manufacturing was prohibited; colonial currency was manipulated; colonial trade was regulated; colonial expansion was prevented; and colonial markets were threatened by British monopolies. (Historian C, O'Reilly).…

    • 2621 Words
    • 75 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the War of Independence the colonies were now free from British rule. However, that came with a price to pay. Being their own separate country, the United States, having a weak economy and many complaints and disagreements with Britain. In an attempt to resolve this problem, Washington sent John Jay, the current Supreme Court justice, to Britain to negotiate with the British. After making coming to terms with Great British, the Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation, commonly known as Jay’s Treaty was created. This treaty did nothing to help America. All this treaty did was hurt the American economy because large corporations couldn’t trade with the British West Indies, further divided the country between Federalists and Anti- Federalist, and only prolonged the…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franco-Dutch War Analysis

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1623, the Dutch massacred English merchants in Amboina, setting off a series of offensive military behavior between the two powers (6). War officially broke out between the two from 1652 to 1654. Each was attempting to become the undisputed world leader in trade, and pursued campaigns to interfere with shipping routes, port access, and foreign trade policies. The British won the first Anglo-Dutch war, but another such conflict arose in 1664 when England attacked African territories belonging to the Dutch. The English proceeded to claim the Dutch Republic’s North American colonies, causing injury to Dutch trade. At this time France engaged in war with England, but took no active interest in Dutch victory. The Dutch eventually gained the upper hand in a series of battles and the peace treaty, the 1667 Treaty of Breda, marked a triumph for the Dutch with regards to trade. The agreement prompted a shift in land holdings between the two powers, however, and trade remained a point of contention between Europe’s leading countries. Much of the hostility that remained was directed at the Dutch, most significantly on the part of the French (4). France’s many alliances placed in in a relatively secure position leading up to the Dutch War. French diplomat Arnauld de Pomponne forged strategic alliances with English,…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit Four Essay

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction, today we will read about how a struggling countries government will step in and help assist using the mercantilist economic system. Situation: the Dutch dominated the shipping channels on overseas trade; monopolizing the financial rewards. The current government, the English, needed to intervene on the Dutch because; they were monopolizing the transatlantic shipping lines like it was their “turf”; and had established business relationships with the Europeans- France and Spain. Their process was to pick up and deliver manufactured products between ports, collect delivery fees, and, employ their own countrymen. Who was benefiting? The Dutch and their European relationships-France and Spain. Who was hurting? The English economy. The English government’s goal: to replace Dutch dominance on the transatlantic shipping lines with English presence. Starting in 1651, four types of mercantile regulations were created and installed to help regulate imperial trade. First application of The Navigation Act of 16512...ref first para..…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The geographical area gained by the British in the Treaty of Paris in 1763 gave the British a dominance of the continent both politically and geographically. The length of the British government’s…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Reciprocity Treaty of 1854, also known as the Elgin-Marcy Treaty, was a trade treaty between Great Britain and the United States. It affects British land in North America including the United Province of Canada, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, PEI, and Newfoundland .The Treaty was in effective from 1854 to 1865. It represented an act toward free trade between the countries. After the conclusion of the American Civil War,the Americans successfully terminated the treaty due to protectionist elements in 1866. Because of this, British North America wanted to form the Dominion of Canada (1867), which opened up many new economic opportunities inside Canada. Attempts by the Liberal Party of Canada to revive free trade in 1911 led to a political victory…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early years of colonial settlement in the Americas, the struggle for land ownership between European countries seemed everlasting. One feud between Great Britain and France led to the French and Indian War during the mid 18th century. After the war was over in 1763, the political, economic and ideological relations between Britain and its American colonies were altered. Although altered, not all would agree that they were altered for the worse.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Dbq French Indian War

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The economic relations with England became noticeably strained after the French and Indian War. Parliament decided the quickest way to regain some of the costs of the war and the quartering of troops would be to tax the most profitable of the colonies, the West Indies. This…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prior to 1763 the colonists had no choice but to go along with Parliament's right to take actions on their behalf and the predominance of Britain's economic benefits over their personal ones. Seven Years' War was the war that altered the parliaments actions, had been intended to regulate trade and nothing else, Parliament's arrangements began to conflict with the colonists' interests. This caused the colonies to grow and thrive, by the time the British realized this Americans had already established lucrative trade with other countries. Britain became more aware of this growing “problem” and began to keep a close eye on the colonies and implemented regulatory policies, the British instituted a series of laws of trade and navigation known as the Navigation Acts. The purposes of these acts were to limit colonial trade to the British only. For this to be accomplished all trading to be done involving the colonists was to be on either English vessels or…

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Initially, the British followed a policy of non-intervention in relation between the Malay states.[19] The commercial importance of tin mining in the Malay states to merchants in the Straits Settlements led to infighting between the aristocracy on the peninsula. The destabilisation of these states damaged the commerce in the area, causing British intervention. The wealth of Perak’s tin mines made political stability there a priority for British investors, and Perak was thus the first Malay state to agree to the supervision of a British resident.[14] British gunboat diplomacy was employed to bring about a peaceful resolution to civil disturbances caused by Chinese and Malay gangsters employed in a political tussle between Ngah Ibrahim and Raja Muda Abdullah. The Pangkor Treaty of 1874 paved the way for the expansion of British influence in Malaya. The British concluded treaties with some Malay states, installing “residents” who advised the Sultans and soon became the effective rulers of their states.[28] These advisors held power in everything except to do with Malay religion and customs.[14]…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays