Preview

Andrew Jackson's Indian Policy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
330 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Andrew Jackson's Indian Policy
Jack Giggey
11/1/10
Merrill 4th
Question One Known as having adopted an Indian child as his son, Andrew Jackson was quite fond of the Indian race; however, with pressure to expand westward, he needed to transfer the Indians farther west and soon became their worst enemy. Andrew Jackson’s Indian Policy was to move the Indians westward as peacefully as possible, for the tribes that stayed in the East Coast were annihilated. Also, moving them West will help them live longer, and there is a fair exchange for the tribes moving. Another important component is the gain of Western lands and the addition of American power; this will add on to America’s size and increase America’s authority. Jackson validates his actions by saying he will pay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his message, “On Indian Removal”, Andrew Jackson uses the term “savages” to refer to the Native Americans. It is very obvious that the word “savage” is used as a derogatory term towards the native Americans. This contributes to the tone of the message as a whole because Jackson is convincing the Congress that the removal of the Native Americans is positive for white men and woman. In “Samuel’s Memory”, Michael Rutledge uses the term “whites” to refer to the white soldiers that were sent to remove the tribes from their land.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With demand for the Native Americans to be gone so high, Jackson was left with few choices. He believed population transfer was truly the only humane way for progress to take place and to preserve the Native American culture all at once. It was the Senate that passed the…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As explained in this chapter of Davidson and Lytle’s After the Fact: The Art of Historical Detection, a historical theory is not necessarily a clear and definite principle about something, rather it is an untested hypothesis. Historians incorporate many factors into their theories to help explain events and support their hypotheses, and these focuses affect their basic understanding of history. This is commonly referred to as “Grand Theory”—an overall explanation of phenomena in a particular discipline or realm of experience such as economics, sociology, or history. As we saw in the previous chapter on the Salem Witch Trials, each historian's input and perspective introduced new possibilities and explanations…

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great Cherokee Nation that had fought the young Andrew Jackson back in 1788 now faced an even more powerful and determined man who was intent on taking their land. But where in the past they had resorted to guns, tomahawks, and scalping knives, now they chose to challenge him in a court of law. They were not called a 'civilized nation' for nothing. Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper. And they had adopted many skills of the white man to improve their living conditions. Why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it. As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court. Prior to that action, they sent a delegation to Washington to plead their cause. They petitioned Congress to protect them against the unjust laws of Georgia that had decreed that they were subject to its sovereignty and under its complete jurisdiction. They even approached the President, but he curtly informed them that there was nothing he could do in their quarrel with the state, a statement that shocked and amazed them.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elected in 1828, Andrew Jackson remained popular with the general public. Jackson asserted that the fundamentals of democracy lay in absolute acceptance of the majority – the common man. Jackson persuaded countless Americans by stressing Jackson’s life story as a man from modest origins to becoming a successful planter. He is associated with the movement of increased popular participation in government, nearly doubling voter turnout during his second election. Jackson, the man who accentuated the spoils system, expanded Suffrage, and emphasized Laissez-faire Economics is indubitably not only the “Champion of the Common Man” but also the modern foundation of democracy.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document J people assumed Jackson hated indians and wanted them out and gone far forever .Jackson wanted indian tribes to have a guaranteed stay district west of the Mississippi . He mentions how the tribes have become extinct because of “persuasion and force they have been made to retire from river to river and from mountain to mountain “(document j,page 61). Jackson wants to prevent that and give the indian tribes a permanent stay .…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson is a very controversial figure. If the question was ever asked if Andrew Jackson is a good leader for America the answer would be no. Jackson was born into a very wealthy family. Not only was he wealthy, Jackson was a very intelligent person. According to “After the Fact”,” Jackson first moved to the town of Salisbury, North Carolina, reading law by day, and with the help of high-spirited young friends, raising hell by night” (131). Jackson would keep up this type of behavior all of the time. When you normally think about a leader you would think of them as being a very mature level headed person.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time President Andrew Jackson wanted the United States to expand their territory westward and the only way to do that was to move the minority which were the indian tribes farther west, so that more Americans could settle in the west past the Mississippi river and expand the economy and nation. Also, many ask whether or not the Indian Removal Act would have been passed if the law would have been up for vote. Being that southerners wanted to move into the west to expand and some northerners did too, then I think that the majority of the votes would have pushed the law through and it would have been passed like it already was. Although, there would also be a fair share of those who opposed since American citizens wanted the indians to keep their land because of what they believed in.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, when Andrew Jackson became president, he had an idea during his presidency to remove all the Native Americans west from the Mississippi River. Thus creating the Native Americans to move from their homelands that they have settled for…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The East coast of the United States was burdened with new settlers and becoming over populated. President Andrew Jackson and the government had to find a way to alleviate this over crowdedness and move people to the West. The government passed the Indian Removal Policy in the year 1830, which called for the removal of Native Americans from the Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia areas. It also moved the Seminole capital, Echota, in Tennessee to the new capital called New Echota, Georgia and then eventually to the Indian Territory. The Indian Territory was declared in the Act of Congress in 1830 with the Indian Removal Policy.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jackson was a protector of democracy for "Equal protection and equal benefits" for all men. He wanted to be rid of any organization or institution promoting specific privilege to anyone.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When Andrew Jackson became president his drive of Indian removal started a discussion among all Americans. This controversial discussion was not only between Americans and the Cherokee Indians, but also controversial within the Cherokee people. Some Cherokee saw this conflict in different ways and with different possible outcomes. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 Made these discussions a real part of the Cherokee’s life. With the act Andrew Jackson planned on exchanging lands west of the Mississippi river for Cherokee’s land and only after they agreed to. Jackson also added that the new land would always be protected and that land exchange was fair for both parties. A small group of Cherokee’s saw removal as the only outcome and safest solution to this conflict and signed the Treaty of New Echota. This Act, Treaty, and these promises are what brought about the contrasting views of John Ross and Elias Boudinot.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Indian Removal

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the early 1800s, while the fast growing country of the United states urged its people to expand to the south, on what was home to many Indian nations including the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole. In search for land to grow cotton, white settlers considered these tribes an obstacle that stood in the way of progress. Pressures to the federal government to take over this land increased as more and more people tried settled in the south. This led to many treaties and compromise attempts between the federal government and the people of each tribe, to try to come to an agreement. Andrew Jackson, the president at the time, found himself in a tough situation, having to make decision for his country’s people.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Declaration of Independence, “all men are created equal” is called a self-evident truth. However, in reality, this sentence didn’t apply to all human beings in the country. Groups like Indians were treaty poorly with lower social status in the country while the whites became the exploiter of others. This contradiction of advocating equality without practicing it became much obvious in the market revolution, a time when demand for lands and cheap labors grew by new industries and advanced transportation developed according to Ronald Takaki.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cherokee Indian Removal

    • 4670 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The basic problem was how to get the Indian Territory. The Washington Administration viewed four possibilities for the Indians. First, extermination was often favored but impractical. Second, isolation was equally impossible. Third, citizenship many believed the Indians should become citizens, but the Indians refused this. Fourth, removal was at first rejected by the Indians but became the only alternative.# The Washington Administration first tried regulating the Indians under the Secretary of War, Henry Knox. The administration then began a policy of '"'Indian civilization.'"' It wanted to create a race of Indian people that relied less on hunting and more on agriculture. The Washington Administration continually entertained the notion that once the Indians were proficient in agrarian sciences, they would be able to cede their lands in the east and move westward. Certain Cherokee refused to assimilate into the '"'white'"' agrarian way of life and voluntarily immigrated to the western regions of the country. These Cherokee were a minority, for most Cherokee stayed in their homelands and worked toward a more '"'civilized'"' way of…

    • 4670 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays