Preview

Andrew Jackson Vs The Cherokee Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
874 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Andrew Jackson Vs The Cherokee Analysis
In the article of “Andrew Jackson versus the Cherokee,” Andrew Jackson wasn’t love by the Indians at all; in fact he hated the Indians because the Indians are getting support and protected by the Supreme Court. In this article, Robert V. Remini says, “Chief Justice John Marshall handed down his decision on March 18, 1831… but he also rejected Jackson’s claim that they were subject to state law” (355). Jackson’s claim is that the Indians are relying on the Supreme Court more than themselves, which is why Jackson dislike people who is getting depended on instead of taking care of themselves. However, the Indian does not like Jackson too. The main reasons the Indians do not like Jackson is because he had taken their land and causes many Indians …show more content…
It happen during Black Hawk War when Chief Black Hawk led two groups, the Sac and Fox Indians, back to their home in Illinois because they “found their western country unacceptable…” (356). However, the Illinois militia drove the Indians into Wisconsin and killed more than three hundred Indians. After the war, they kept Black Hawk and his chiefs as prisoners and hostages. When Jackson became president, he sent Black Hawk to Fortress Monroe and so he does what Jackson order him to do because he doesn’t want violence and kept his promised to keep the peace. After a couple of years when Black Hawk had been released and saw Jackson again at the hotel in Baltimore, Jackson says, “When I saw you in Washington, I told you that you had behaved very badly, in raising the tomahawk against white people, and killing men, women and children upon frontier…”(358). This quote shows how Black Hawk hated Jefferson very much. He lost most of his people, yet they do not want to use violence against the white settlers when they are trying to go back to their home town. The white settlers started the Black Hawk War when they pleaded the federal government for protection of the Indians invasion. Therefore, the Indians do not like Jackson because they lost numerous of Indians during the war in …show more content…
The Indian is trying to go back to their homeland, but they were invaded by the white settlers along with the protection from the federal government; so they lost most of their people during the Black Hawk War. Their Principal Chief Ross is helping the Indian nation to bring back their homeland, but he lost to Jackson during the bidding and so Jackson bought the Indian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The first chapter goes back in history and sets up the story and setting. It was the eighteenth century and the Americans were beginning to invade the lands west of the Mississippi River. This caused problems because even though Americans saw the lands as an unoccupied region, Sitting Bull and his Lakota or Sioux people knew it as their homeland. While the Indians were living their normal lives by hunting and following the buffalo, the Americans were moving out west and fast. They established a railway and were on the move for gold. The buffalo population was rapidly decreasing because they interfered with the railroad and the Americans were killing them. This dramatic decrease of buffalo caused a struggle for the Indians because buffalo was their main supplier for resources like food, clothing, and shelter.…

    • 2736 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Americans came, we were told that the land is no longer ours. This is due to a law called andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Policy. I do not know who Andrew is, I already do not like him.The Americans have gave us nothing.The Americans had told us that we are going on a trail to a new land, we can have the land their.We did not have time to pack, and we did not have room to bring much.Once we started walking on the trail I could tell it was going to be a long walk, it was just one of these feelings. We walked for miles at a time without stopping for breaks.To be honest diary I do not believe the elders are going to make it, they keep slowing down and stopping. After about en miles I could no longer see the elders, I hope they are fine.We…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    party. Jackson was not very nice in his dealings with the American Indians, and he is often blamed for the suffering of tribes :ex Trail of Tears. He served…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Known as having adopted an Indian child as his son, Andrew Jackson was quite fond of the Indian race; however, with pressure to expand westward, he needed to transfer the Indians farther west and soon became their worst enemy. Andrew Jackson’s Indian Policy was to move the Indians westward as peacefully as possible, for the tribes that stayed in the East Coast were annihilated. Also, moving them West will help them live longer, and there is a fair exchange for the tribes moving. Another important component is the gain of Western lands and the addition of American power; this will add on to America’s size and increase America’s authority.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alfred A. Cave describes, at length, the Indian Removal Act, motivations behind the removal, as well as Jackson’s personal beliefs on the Indian tribes and his blatant refusal to acknowledge Indian treaties.25 While Professor Cave provides numerous references to Jackson’s refusal to deal with the Indian population, the most important aspect of his work, as it deals with…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As explained in this chapter of Davidson and Lytle’s After the Fact: The Art of Historical Detection, a historical theory is not necessarily a clear and definite principle about something, rather it is an untested hypothesis. Historians incorporate many factors into their theories to help explain events and support their hypotheses, and these focuses affect their basic understanding of history. This is commonly referred to as “Grand Theory”—an overall explanation of phenomena in a particular discipline or realm of experience such as economics, sociology, or history. As we saw in the previous chapter on the Salem Witch Trials, each historian's input and perspective introduced new possibilities and explanations…

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Trail of Tears was a harsh and inhumane event that happened in the 1830’s. Indian tribes were forced off of their land and they were involuntarily relocated to what is now Oklahoma. There was fear and resentment among the white settlers when it came to their Native American adversaries. They were a different kind of people than the whites when it came to how they lived, spoke, dressed and as well as their religious beliefs. This unfamiliarity with them led to the settlers believing that they were better than the indians and that they should leave the land and be forced to live in an ‘indian land’ if they refused to conform to Christianity as well as learn to speak English. However as more and more settlers flooded into the area, the land became more and more coveted. They no longer cared how civilized the indians became; they wanted them gone (Brief History of the Trail of Tears).…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When we look back into history, we are now able to fully comprehend the atrocities the Indians faced at the hands of the historic general and President, Andrew Jackson. It can be seen as one of the most shameful and unjust series of political actions taken by an American government. However, as an American living almost 200 years later, it is crucial to look at the motives possessed by Andrew Jackson, and ask whether he fully comprehended the repercussions of his actions or if is was simply ignorant to what he was subjection the natives to. We must also consider weather he truly had the countries best interest in mind, or his own.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great Cherokee Nation that had fought the young Andrew Jackson back in 1788 now faced an even more powerful and determined man who was intent on taking their land. But where in the past they had resorted to guns, tomahawks, and scalping knives, now they chose to challenge him in a court of law. They were not called a 'civilized nation' for nothing. Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper. And they had adopted many skills of the white man to improve their living conditions. Why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it. As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court. Prior to that action, they sent a delegation to Washington to plead their cause. They petitioned Congress to protect them against the unjust laws of Georgia that had decreed that they were subject to its sovereignty and under its complete jurisdiction. They even approached the President, but he curtly informed them that there was nothing he could do in their quarrel with the state, a statement that shocked and amazed them.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of 1812, America became involved in a conflict with the Native Americans. The British armed Native Americans to fight the Americans. After this conflict was mostly settled, Jefferson made the Louisiana Purchase. Settlers were sent to expand west, but the land the settlers were sent to explore was occupied by Native Americans. Jackson created the Indian Removal Act to get them off the land, leading to the Trail of Tears where Native Americans were forced off their land and taken to Oklahoma. The multiple perspectives of the sources concerning the Indian Removal Act and Trail of Tears help shape the reader’s view of these events by explaining what happened, the causes of it, and the perspectives of the people involved.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson’s Indian removal policy in the 1830’s raised many questions as to whether or not it was constitutional. To start off the Indian removal policy was a law that authorized the president to negotiate with southern tribes for them to remove themselves to federal territory west of the Mississippi river in return for their native land that they occupied. Although, it was basically mandatory that the indians move from their lands there were different responses to the removal policy. One response was from the southerners who wanted to occupy the lands that the indians were on and the other was from the christian missionaries who felt the need to support the indians right to the land and the indians who lived on the lands who…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson also known as, ‘Old Hickory’ promoted many policies that impacted the young nation. Known for his authoritarian style during his presidency it was no surprise Jackson would be harsh with the Native Americans and treat the Indians with no mercy while doing so. “Like most white frontiersmen. Jackson viewed Indians as barbarians without rights…” (Shi & Tindall 2015 p. 330) this influenced his decision to request congress to approve the Indian Removal Act. By debating this request congress allowed the president to neglect all prior treaties/negotiations to protect the lands of the Native American’s forefathers where they were residing. This would fuel the fire between many Americans because they had divided opinions on this matter,…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson was greatly amiss in his measure to force the Indians out of their homes were their ancestors had lived in long ago. Thus because, he used brutal force and harsh conditions before and during the removal of the Indian tribes. “Men paid to move the Cherokee Nation are cruel”(Cherokee). This segment was published on April 4, 1838 along with other various articles, and explains that the Cherokee new that the government would not treat them with respect nor kindness. While disliked by the vast majority of Indians, most of the everyday people actually admired Jackson because they saw him as somewhat of a hero because he gave the perception that the Indians were uncivilized savages, and by removing them he…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The East coast of the United States was burdened with new settlers and becoming over populated. President Andrew Jackson and the government had to find a way to alleviate this over crowdedness and move people to the West. The government passed the Indian Removal Policy in the year 1830, which called for the removal of Native Americans from the Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia areas. It also moved the Seminole capital, Echota, in Tennessee to the new capital called New Echota, Georgia and then eventually to the Indian Territory. The Indian Territory was declared in the Act of Congress in 1830 with the Indian Removal Policy.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several other examples that are in propaganda are used in Jackson speech to hold against the Indians tribes. The speech at the Jackson was successful when the government owns the state to extinguish the Indians, but their put limits so they cannot break the deal. For an example some of Indians tribes are very powerful, so they do not have limits at all but that's why the state coextensive with their limits. Also is is right what Jackson did after two years of final terms ended between the government failures or the Indians affairs. For an example Jackson believes in change that we can live in a great liberty on the part of the government and keep people happy and free. Likewise does the war end in peace with Indian tribes or we coexist…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays