Analyzing The Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

The existence of God relies heavily on the idea that there must be a creator of everything, whether the creator is a person, or an event. The cosmological argument for the existence of God starts by asking why does something exist? And the logical follow through is everything exists has an explanation for its presence in the universe, the universe exists and therefore must have a creator. An argument could be made to say that God is the answer for who created the universe. Many will say that the existence of the universe does not inherently mean that the creator is God. Although this raises a crucial question, what is God if not the creator of the universe? The definition in many dictionaries is “the creator of the universe”. Just by the definition,
His existence should not be doubted, simply for the reason that God may be an event. All that should be taken from this is the existence of God based on the idea that whatever created the universe is God. However, God can also be proved to be a sentient being. The proof of God being a sentient creature is similar to Rene Descartes belief that the perfect being cannot be imagined within in our own minds, but can only exist if the perfect creature placed the idea within our mind. The problem with this argument is that the idea of perfect cannot be defined, who is to say what perfect is? The idea of perfection is infinite and cannot be truly analyzed, however we can know that the creation of the universe can be qualified as perfect due to our existence and the way nature interacts with itself. The perfect cannot coexist in the universe as we as a species is flawed and cannot attain perfection. The perfection of the universe must exist in one single being. The single embodiment can only be defined as a supreme being. The supreme being can be called anything, but as a society it has been widely accepted to refer to it as