Overall, he needed to work on the persuasive aspects of his speech. When listening to the delivery, it almost sounded like an informative speech about all the different benefits of turf fields. I did not really understand what the action steps were for Sam’s topic because the turf fields is already been approved to be built at the Lakeland campus. I think his topic could have been improved if he changed the direction of his topic a little bit. For example, his topic could have been, “To persuade the class to support the development of the new turf field.” This way, he could use the same supporting data with a more directed action step and make his topic more personal for the students. Lastly, I believe his speech could benefit from a more developed introduction and conclusion. He started his speech with a good attention grabber and photos, but then, simply jumped into his speech. His introduction could be improved by giving a preview of his main points and stating where he got his facts from before the body of his speech. The same goes for Sam’s conclusion, it needed better organization. He signaled the end of his speech and reemphasized a few main points, but he missed a good sign-off with an established action steps. Overall, his weaknesses could be improved through better organization and more practice with his introduction and
Overall, he needed to work on the persuasive aspects of his speech. When listening to the delivery, it almost sounded like an informative speech about all the different benefits of turf fields. I did not really understand what the action steps were for Sam’s topic because the turf fields is already been approved to be built at the Lakeland campus. I think his topic could have been improved if he changed the direction of his topic a little bit. For example, his topic could have been, “To persuade the class to support the development of the new turf field.” This way, he could use the same supporting data with a more directed action step and make his topic more personal for the students. Lastly, I believe his speech could benefit from a more developed introduction and conclusion. He started his speech with a good attention grabber and photos, but then, simply jumped into his speech. His introduction could be improved by giving a preview of his main points and stating where he got his facts from before the body of his speech. The same goes for Sam’s conclusion, it needed better organization. He signaled the end of his speech and reemphasized a few main points, but he missed a good sign-off with an established action steps. Overall, his weaknesses could be improved through better organization and more practice with his introduction and