Preview

Analyzing Cohen's Arguments For Civil Disobedience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
523 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzing Cohen's Arguments For Civil Disobedience
A venture in philosophical skepticism whose only practical effect might be to dissuade an isolated individual from civil disobedience on the basis of uncertainty. Cohen, a University of Michigan philosopher, posits that every citizen has a prima facie duty to obey the nation's laws; in knowingly breaking a law the disobedient has engaged in serious action, which is however less than revolutionary since he accepts the basic legitimacy of the authorities. Reviewing utilitarian arguments for civil disobedience, Cohen's gnawing doubts get the better of him: ""It is obvious that even the attempt at such a justification must be a very complicated affair."" The ""higher law"" argument is dispatched; free speech defenses are rejected by declaring civil disobedience other than a form of speech. …show more content…
Now for arguments presented against civil disobedience: of seven, Cohen concludes that none ""succeeds in showing that civil disobedience can never be justified."" Finally, the penetrating conclusion that ""Civil disobedience as a means is extraordinary, but, after all, so are the problems society sometimes confronts.""

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Prompt: Does your book contain one or more of the following themes? What techniques does the author use to develop this theme?…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Dellinger is mostly known for being part of the Chicago Seven, but his radicalism started far before the Vietnam War. By the time he graduated from Yale in 1938, he had already been arrested while “marching to support unionisation at Yale” (Carlson). Dellinger discovered pacifism was the best when, during an argument at a Yale football game, he punched his opponent. He learned his lesson like a child learns after touching a hot stove, not to do it again. (Carlson). During his visit to Europe, he got to witness Nazi Germany and civil war in Spain first hand. It was then when he realized that “whoever won the armed struggle, it would not be the people” (Carlson). When conscription was passed in 1940,…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tim Dechristopher

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thoreau, a Harvard philosopher, wrote in 1849 an essay explaining himself, who spent a night in jail to protest taxes that funded the Mexican-American War. Likewise, Tim Dechristopher, an environmental activist in 2008, disrupted the bid for oil drilling leases, to hinder and protest the destruction of the environment. Thoreau explains his antithesis, “If [U.S. Citizens] pay the tax from a mistaken interest in the individual taxes, to save his property, or prevent his going to jail, it is because they have not considered wisely how far they let their private feelings interfere with the public good” (Thoreau 3, 10). Hence, he states that doing unjust and illegal activities is justifiable, if it boosts public welfare. Similarly, Dechristopher’s illegal act of fraud is justified in the New York Times article, “Activist said the sale would threaten Utah’s wild lands and spoil the view from some of the state’s spectacular national parks with drilling rigs” (Associated Press 11). As many environmental activists agree, the public welfare of the people relies on the health of the environment. Seeing Dechristopher verbally support his own act of civil disobedience, and in like manner, Thoreau justifying his act and accepting it, it is deducted that they are both embodiments of civil disobedience. If civil disobedience was construed, Thoreau and…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Seven Guidelines for Civil Disobedience, Howard Zinn presents civil disobedience as an act of deliberately violating a law for a societal purpose (Zinn 1). Therefore, civil disobedience is completely justified when society is threatened by a regime that practices absolute sovereignty. It is justified because absolute sovereignty only serves the interests of the state, not ours. Zinn perfectly uncovers the agenda of absolute sovereignty by stating: “We must never forget that we and the state are separate in our interest, and we must not be lured into forgetting this by the agents of the state. The state seeks power and wealth…[while] the individual seeks, health, peace, creative activity, and love” (Zinn 2). Consequently, absolute sovereignty…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” (Henry Thoreau) This famous quote is taken from the famous essay Civil Disobedience written in 1848, Civil Disobedience still stands as an expression of moral and individual conscience against a un just government. To begin, the quote written by Henry Thoreau, “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” is essentially saying If following the law results in a wrong done to another person, then do not follow the law, and that morals from human to human come before government rules or laws resulting in disobedience.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Case Against Civil Disobedience the unknown author claims in his very first sentence that “the most striking characteristic of civil disobedience is its irrelevance to the problems of today” and that it is “the resort… exercised because the subject cannot or will not take up the rights and duties of the citizen.” What he fails to realize is that the rights and duties of a citizen is to keep an eye on the laws that rule the land and to revolt when those laws become unjust. It’s all part and parcel to the social contract thought up by Locke and heavily leaned upon by Thomas Jefferson. As Henry David Thoreau says in Civil Disobedience, “a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscious.” Civil disobedience can never become irrelevant because corruption will forever attempt to corrode even the best intentions of a government and so there will always be a need to revolt when unjust laws get pasted.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James A. Baldwin, an American novelist and social critic, stated that, “I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.” The right to stand against our country and protest against what’s wrong makes us powerful diverse people. We, the American people, are in charge of our country and we must make her forever progressive and right. Part of this forward motion is civil disobedience. Civil disobedience was used to create our nation, exercise our civilian powers, and is still used today to eradicate benighted ideas and laws.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Subpoint A: Civil disobedience has played an important part in the shaping of the United States. The United States is a constitutional republic, which is a not a direct democracy but a derivative of one. The Boston Tea Party is one example. It was an act of civil disobedience to protest the oppressive British government. Another example is Harriet Tubman’s Underground Railroad. Tubman illegally did the moral thing by helping many slaves get to freedom. The Women’s suffrage movement. Thousands of women braved arrest and prison to gain their democratic right of voting. The civil rights movement, the introduction of labor laws and unions, environmental demonstrations, anti-war protests, all these are examples of civil disobedience. Civil disobedience has been proved time and time again to be effective in the United States, a model for democracy.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is using nonviolent protest to boycott government in an attempt to influence the legislation to change the policy. Henry David Thoreau created a writing called "Civil Disobedience", talking about its meaning and how he had experienced civil disobedience. He had been sent to jail for not paying a poll-tax for six years (Thoreau par. 7). When he was released, he paid the tax; obeying the law, but had still thought that government is biased for making him pay it (McElroy par. 2). Wendy McElroy stated "He listened to the inner voice of his conscience, a voice all men possess but few men follow (McElroy par. 5). Thoreau listened to his belief and did not pay the tax because he did not believe it was something that he should have to do. Overall, Thoreau was a simple man who relied on nonviolent nature and his own beliefs to disobey the government and its laws. Thoreau would have recognized the Singing Revolution in Europe and the Kent State University protestors as significant acts of civil disobedience considering…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau was arrested for his refusal to pay a state tax in support of the Mexican-American War. He was opposed to the war because it was intended to expand the slave states. Thoreau not only engaged in civil disobedience, but in his essay “Civil Disobedience”…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate was thrust into a hotbed of discussion during the peak of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. In 1964, Morris I. Leibman was an avid anti-civil disobedience activist. He argued that there is no reason for any citizen to find an excuse to break the law because when people agree to enter society, they accept the rules that society establishes. Once you break these laws, there is no purpose to society existing in the first place. He argues that if you give leeway to certain circumstances in the law, where do you draw the line? In his mind, civil disobedience is deplorable and believes it’s the wrong way to create change. Continuing with this train of thought, Herbert Storing argued that civil disobedience would likely die out because of its irrelevance to today’s problems. He found it’s attempt to combine revolution and conventional political action into one as a blend of ideas ineffective in its approach for change. Both of these men wrote their responses to civil disobedience at the height of the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. and both agreed that black people deserved equal opportunity under the law, but they felt that civil disobedience was a regressive tactic…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It becomes a kind of despotism where we seek to silence rather than engage.” Civil disobedience is a necessary part of free society, as it provides an avenue from which all people can make themselves heard, regardless of political power or economic status. Furthermore, it is necessary to keep the spirit of the first amendment alive, as peaceful protest is a way in which people exercise their right to free speech; without peaceful resistance to laws, little progress would be made in a free society, and the views of the majority would be imposed on the rest of the population. Acting as a catalyst for change, peaceful resistance one ingredient of the recipe that drives a free nation towards growth and…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some argue that civil disobedience represents a genuine cause, but reject the methods of direct action simply as disruptive, immoral, and an illegal standard to combat inequality. Civil disobedience is stigmatized to be corrupt and ineffective; however, I believe these labels do no justice to the cause the act of civil disobedience embodies. Unfortunately, the reality becomes a simple and cruel true: Justice prolonged is justice denied. Not everyone is granted the luxury of timely inalienable rights. Had it not been for those who protested and engaged in the Boston Tea Party how long would have the conversation or much less the American Revolution been delayed? Had it not been for Rosa Parks and the countless others who engaged in civil disobedience how long would it have been before society was desegregated at the choice of the oppressor? When one engages in peaceful civil disobedience, one is given the platform to address the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to rules and regulations among society goes down historically as something so inevitably iconic as an occurrence known as civil disobedience. It is no doubt that civil disobedience, the act of opposing a law deemed unjust and peacefully disobeying it henceforth, spurs such great controversy in our society. Civil disobedience impacts society in a positive manner that does not hinder nor deteriorate the good name of the just nation that is home, but moreover poses as an influence for what is better accepted by humans as lawful.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These rules set limits on the manner in which participants may seek to influence community decision-making, are the foundation of a morally just government. By deliberately breaking its rules, the civil disobedient supplies a form of pressure unlawful in court, thereby negating the principle of the majority rule. In doing so, a state of war is created between the civil disobedient and his community, forcing the community to respond similarly, undermining and rendering inapplicable the democratic process.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays