Preview

Analyzing Antonin Scalia's Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
629 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzing Antonin Scalia's Case
Antonin Scalia was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from September 1986, until February 2016, when he unfortunately passed away. Scalia was born in New Jersey but later moved to Queens in New York (Reilly, 2016). Scalia’s parents were both teachers, which may have been why he was valedictorian when graduating from St. Francis Xavier high school. After high school, he went to Georgetown University, where he also graduated at the top of his class, achieving the honor of valedictorian yet again (Reilly, 2016). Scalia got his bachelor’s degree in history, but wanted to further his education, so he went on to Harvard Law School, where he graduated again as valedictorian of his class in 1960 (Reilly, 2016). After graduating from Harvard Law, Scalia worked in a private practice for just a couple of years, only to discover he would rather be teaching as a law professor at a University, which is what he ended up doing. …show more content…
He went on to become Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, then 8 years later he was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals by Ronald Regan. During Regan’s presidency, Scalia was appointed, and confirmed by the senate to be one of the Associate Justices on the Supreme Court (Reilly, 2016). Antonin Scalia earned his place on the Supreme Court through hard work, and dedication to the Judicial System throughout his career. Scalia’s voice will never be forgotten because he remained to have a strong conservative view throughout his career, and always vocalized his opinions on issues brought forth in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    What was David Souter’s background prior to joining the Court? Which President nominated him? What were his personality traits?…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia Summary

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout Antonin Scalia’s dissent opinion, he states that the way the court interprets the Affordable Care Act, is different to the way he interprets it. For instance, the interpretation of “exchange established by the state,” and the tax credits under code §36B differs between the court and Scalia.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Constitution was created, some topics were explained in great detail, yet some were explained very vaguely causing many disputes over how certain topics should be dealt with. In Article III, it states how the Judicial Branch works. It decides what the court bases their decisions on. In Article II of the U.S. Constitution it states how a justice must be replaced, who picks the new justice, which is the president, yet there is no time frame stated on how long it must take to pick a new justice. The president of the United States is to pick the new justice and the Senate confirms it. After a sudden death to Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, the decision must be made to pick a new justice now or to allow the new…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia opens up his introduction stating he wants to make clear that his moral views on capital punishment do not have persuasion on how his referendums in capital cases that come to the Supreme Court. Furthermore, Antonin Scalia is not daunted to state his views on church-state issues and has consistently shown he has scant use for the First Amendment’s separation of church and state. In an essay he writes titled, “God’s Justice and Ours,” Scalia explains why he is compelled to support the death penalty despite his church’s opposition to the practice. Moreover, he explains his worldview about how a government acquires moral authority and why the nation-state can permissibly eradicate its own citizens. He concludes that government is an instrument of God and an institution that operates with “divine authority behind” it. In addition, he goes on to write that people of faith should fight “as effectively as possible” any effort to “obscure” our government’s religious underpinnings. However, the complication is that Scalia is one-ninth of this country's highest judicial body. He has unique responsibilities that demand strict neutrality and objectivity. While Scalia can be credulous on whatever he wants about issues of faith, he may not practice religion as the basis for judicial rulings. In short, he avowed on the Bible to uphold the Constitution, not the other way around. In conclusion, Scalia has relinquished any pretense about keeping a healthy distance between the institutions of religion and government. He has consciously and intentionally turned his back on the framework set up by the Founding Fathers, which created a secular government based on a secular Constitution adopted by "we the people." Our laws were not created to enforce a divine authority, however according to the Constitution, to "form a more perfect union.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Antonin Scalia voted in the minority in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges. Scalia follows the attitudinal model and is a very strict originalist when it comes to the constitution. An example of this decision making process is Scalia’s position on abortion. Scalia has been against abortion in multiple cases such as Webster v Reproductive Health Services and Sternberg v Carhart. Scalia is very much against abortion and believes that people will look back on these cases the same way they look at the Dred Scott Decision. This shows how his values have affected his decisions in the past and in this…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before he was the U.S. attorney general he was a lawyer. He got his degree for from the University of Nebraska Lincoln, and from Yale University. He moved out of Nebraska and practice in New York. He worked for many law…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sotomayor's Analysis

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In My Beloved World, Justice Sonia Sotomayor chronicles her rise from an impoverished childhood in the Bronx to a successful legal career. Sotomayor offers a simple rationale for her ability to make this improbable rise: the help of mentors. Throughout her life, Sotomayor relies on the advice and help of others, allowing her to first see beyond her poor neighborhood then reach the summit of the legal profession. Sotomayor both seeks mentorship from obvious sources like her mother, her grandmother, and later professors, and qualities in friends and colleagues. Sotomayor makes it clear: her ability to make mentors of friends and superiors allowed her to reach the office she holds today.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warren presided over several civil rights landmark cases including Brown vs. Board of Education I and II, which would spark the great civil rights movement. Warren also presided over cases such as McGowan vs. Maryland and also Tropp vs. Dulles.…

    • 607 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kennedy. Thurgood Marshall served there until 1965 when Thurgood Marshall became the United States Solicitor General. As Solicitor General Thurgood Marshall represented the federal government before the Supreme…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sonia Sotomayor

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sotomayor was nominated first by George Bush to the United States District Court. During her second circuit, she served as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals. On May 26, 2009 president Barack Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor as an associate Justice of the Supreme Court and she took her seat on August 8, 2009. Barack Obama felt that Sotomayor was an inspiring women. Sonia worked at almost every level of the judicial system and President Obama saw that success in her and thought someone with as much experience as her could be a wonderful part of the Supreme Court. Sotomayor’s seat previously belonged to David Souter. On May 1, 2009, Souter sent a letter to President Obama resigning himself from the Supreme Court. Sotomayor is the public face of the liberal wing. To others, Sonia is a “real” person who is open about herself.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally believe that the meaning of a “well-regulated militia” is when citizens are properly following the laws and abide the rules of bearing arms. Militia can be defined as, “An army composed of ordinary citizens rather than professional soldiers” according to Gary the Gun Nut’s post on Thomhartmann.com. In the District of Columbia v. Heller case, gun control was the purpose problem. The case resulted in protecting the “Second Amendment of an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home,...” in which was a 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joan Biskupic’s novel In American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, describes Scalia’s success as an influential conservative force in the Supreme Court, which conservative lawyer, Alfred S. Regnery, bolsters, expanding on William Rehnquist’s role in establishing the groundwork allowed for a major a shift towards right in courts, in The American Spectator article, “The Good Old Days”. Regnery begins by establishing he agrees with Biskupic’s assertions that Scalia has been the “most influential member”: “changing the terms of the debate at the Court” and influencing many. Regnery, however, submits that although the degree of Scalia’s achievements hadn’t been accomplished before, Rehnquist, in fact…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnson Kennedy’s successor appointed Marshall to serve as the first black U.S. solicitor general, with two years of being solicitor he won 14 out of the 19 cases he had. In 1967 President Johnson nominated Thurgood to serve on the bench by October he was moved up to be a Supreme Court justice, him becoming the first African American to serve on the nation's highest court. He later joined liberal Supreme Court by Chief Justice Earl Warren, who aligned with Thurgood’s viewing on politics and and Constitution. He consistently supported rulings keeping a strong protection on individual rights and the liberal interpretations of controversial social issues. Part of the majority that ruled in favor of the right to abortion in the 1973 case Roe V. Wade, 1972 case Furman V. Georgia that led to De Facto Moratorium on death penalty, Marshall gave his opinion on it by saying that it was unconstitutional in circumstances. Throughout his 24 years on the court republican presidents appointed eight consecutive justices, he gradually became an isolated liberal member of an increasingly conservative court. For the part time on the bench he largely relegated to issuing strongly worded dissents as the court had reinstated the death penalty, limited affirmative, and abortion…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scalia vs Breyer

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia rejects the notion of a “living Constitution,” arguing that the judges must try to understand what the framers meant at the time the text was written. (pg 92) Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer contends that in finding the meaning of the Constitution, judges cannot neglect to consider the probable consequences of different interpretations. In a YouTube video I watched a debate with Breyer and Scalia, the first question asked was regarding purpose and consequence. Breyer Stated that he agrees with text, history, tradition ,precedence, purpose , and consequence , however he feels people emphasize more on text, history, tradition, and precedence and try to avoid , purpose and consequence. However Scalia felt that purpose and consequence invite subjective judgment. He gave an example stating “ If the purpose of the statue is to protect civil rights and if you do not interpret it this limitation on it you will protect civil rights all the more, and therefore you should adopt that interpretation. The problem is the limitation in its statue adopted by the legislature is as much apart of its purpose as protecting is the general purpose of protecting civil rights.”( stated in video) He also argued that he doesn’t agree with peoples interpretation because they pick out the consequences they do and do not like and interpret it according to how they feel about it.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chief Justice Earl Warren

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The US Supreme Court Justice that I chose to write about is Chief Justice Earl Warren. He was one of the most popular Supreme Court Justices only second to Chief Justice John Marshall. Earl Warren had a profound impact on the Supreme Court and United States of America. As Chief Justice, his term of office was marked by numerous rulings on civil rights, separation of church and state, and police arrest procedure in the United States.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays