Preview

Analyzing Adam Smith's Views On The Death Penalty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1964 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzing Adam Smith's Views On The Death Penalty
Honors English 2
Research Paper
Death Penalty
“We Need Capital Punishment” “Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent.” These words were spoken by Adam Smith and talk about his view on the death penalty. Although some believe that it violates that eighth amendment, the death penalty is valuable in today’s society because it preserves law and order as well as deters crime and is cost efficient. The death penalty is a valuable tool in our society also because it is retribution or “an eye for an eye” for the victim’s family. It helps honor the victim as well as helps console the grieving family of the victim. It also ensures that the perpetrators of these terrible crimes never have another opportunity to cause more death and tragedy
…show more content…
And some argue that states with the death penalty have a higher crime rates than states that don’t have the death penalty. However, every state is different in that each state has differences in population, number of cities and crime rates. For example, urbanized states are more likely to have higher crime rates. Also, states that have the death penalty are obliged to have it because of their higher crime rates and not the other way around. Let’s look at some facts. In fact, in 1960, there were 56 executions and 9,140 murders. In 1964, fifteen executions and 9,250 and in 1969 there were no executions. There was a temporary suspension on capital punishment from 1972 to 1976. During this time there were no executions and 20,510 murders. In 1980 there were 23,040 murders with only two executions since 1976. Between 1965 and 1980 the annual murders was from 9,960 to 23,040, which is a 131 percent increase. This is strong evidence that execution is a deterrent of murder. Furthermore, in the state of Texas, has the highest execution rate of any other state. Specifically, the murder rate in 1991 was 15.3 per 100,000 people. By 1999, the rate had fallen to 6.1, a 60 percent drop. In Harris County, Texas, which has the most aggressive death penalty prosecutions, as a result of the resumption of executions in 1982, the murders per year dropped from 701 to 241. That’s a 72 …show more content…
Not only is more cost efficient then life without parole, but it also as a deterrent effect on murder. And there is statistical proof that backs that theory. The death penalty does not violate the eighth amendment as its not cruel or unusual punishment. The death penalty is a better choice than life without parole because it prevents violent murderers from killing again. It also prevents parole boards and criminal rights activists from giving them the chance to repeat their murders. And if that’s not enough proof, let’s look at it in more simple terms. No executed murderer has ever killed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is assumed to deter crime. Yet, Sstudies in 2012 decisively showed that murder is 30% more likely to occur in states implementing the death penalty.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    pre ap reasearch paper

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In our country’s justice system the death penalty is good for many things, such as, serving as a deterrent for violent crimes all over the nation. We as humans have the ability to decide for ourselves whether an idea is good or bad. Often times to do this we look at the actions of others to earthier strengthen our confidence in our idea or to deter the idea that we have. This is the same concept that the death penalty brings to our society. the death penalty according to Richard Worsnop a writer for the CQ Researcher, “…is traditionally justifiyed in society for two reasons, retribution and detturance(Williams). The Latter of the two in retrospect is the most important. In our justice system the main crimes that are punishable by the death penalty are felony murder or murder in the first degree(Mitchell). Felony murder is defined as, “a killing treated as a murder because, though…

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a) In his findings, he states “Data from 1973 to 1984 show that murder rates in the states without the death penalty were consistently lower and averaged only 63% of the corresponding rates in the states retaining it” (Lamperti). (1) This data is important because it analyzes murder rates in the states before and after the death penalty was reintroduced in the United States. C. [Minimizing] Finally, capital punishment can’t be proven to be a deterrent, so the outlawing of capital punishment in the United States won’t increase crime.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The issue that I chose to write about in my paper is the Death Penalty. The Death Penalty has been a serious issue that has recurrently caused so much conflict in our world today. My argument is that the death penalty is very important to bring justice pertaining to murderers. This issue with the death penalty is one of the highest arguments in the United States. The death penalty is something that countless individuals do not have an unclouded opinion on. The death penalty dates all the way back to 1622.…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    It’s so hard to say where I stand with the death penalty. There are those moments when a person commits a crime so heinous you’re in that state of mind of wanting the death penalty for them. But then you realize this is a human being. I truly do not believe in the death penalty. To me, I think executing someone for a various form of wrongdoing would not punish them. Instead I think that’s just taking them out of their misery. The punishment for doing something wrong that is, for that the person committing such an act, should not be killed but put through suffering by living in jail for the rest of their life. It’s tough, and honestly people have their opinions and it’s in their right to go with or without the death penalty. Capital punishment is one of life 's topics that leave many divided opinions due to its risqué nature. It has been a subject full of controversy for centuries and still continues to be discussed to this day. Throughout my piece I will explain the case that is pro Capital Punishment, as well as the contrasting side - the opposition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ernest Van den Haag strongly contends the need for capital punishment in our society in his article. Van den Haag provides a substantial amount of convincing facts and information to support “The Ultimate Punishment”. Van den Haag discusses such topics as maldistribution, deterrence to society, miscarriages of the penalty, and incidental and political issues (cost, relative suffering, and brutalization). The death penalty is indeed the harshest/ultimate punishment a convicted criminal can receive in our society. I agree with Van den Haag’s article. I am in favor of the death penalty system in the United States. Through capital punishment’s determent process, I feel it is a necessary and effective tool in implementing a type of ultimatum to basic life in our legal system. The ethical theory of consequentialism is often referred with capital punishment. Consequentialism mainly points out the benefits of the death penalty to society, like deterrence.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life without parole provides rapid, severe, and certain punishment. All judgement is not right, at times people’s judgments can be clouded or corrupt. For example, a judge could be more lenient with a defendant that only has charges of petty theft than against a defendant fighting against rape charge. The defendant could be innocent, but because he or she is charged with a more hated and heinous crime such as rape or murder, he or she could face bias or unfair punishment. Until the issue of discrimination in capital punishment is fixed the death penalty should be outlawed within the United States. Death row is the ultimate punishment for one’s immorality, therefore it is not right for those who are morally correct and innocent to be put to death just because of some peoples one-sided judgment. Instead of wasting millions of taxpayer dollars meaningless death, the american people should save to protect some of those essential services (such as education) that are now threatened with death from state budget cost. Life without parole could be a very effective alternative to capital punishment, that not only saves money, but also…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have for a long time been in favor of capital punishment for convicted murderers. In a 1981 Gallup Poll, two-thirds of Americans spoke their opinion for the Death Penalty (Radelet, Akers, 1996). These polls have determined that most Americans are very clear about the issue that the Death Penalty is justified punishment for murder. The justification suggests that murderers should be executed for the killing alone, murderers should suffer, and just…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many controversial points of view on the death penalty in America’s society. Is the death penalty socially correct? Is it just? The death penalty is an execution sentence that a person convicted of a capital crime must face. A person can only be sentenced to death in 33 states (deathpenatly.org). There have been as of April 1, 2012, 3,170 death row inmates in the Unites States history, with an exception of the two inmates in New Mexico and eleven in Connecticut that remain on the death row due to the law not being made retrospective to these inmates. The controversy whether the death penalty is just or unjust has been a debate in America for many years. There have been 141 exonerations in 26 different states as of October 1, 2012. Although there are many social and societal views about the death penalty, do people deserve the right to die, do two wrong doings make a right doing. Furthermore, should criminals who are mentally incompetent be given the death penalty given that they have committed a crime that requires intelligence? For the states that do have the death row, should those states be more reluctant to give the death row sentence to inmates being that there have been 141 exonerations? The death penalty is a very serious punishment which is why it raises the questions if it is morally right, what the societal view are upon this subject matter, should criminals who are mentally incompetent be given the death penalty, and for those state who support the death penalty sentence be more reluctant to give the death penalty due to the numerous inmates on death row that were found not guilty of capital crime. The death penalty is important to not only me but also to the criminals who may face the capital punishment because it is such a harsh punishment. After the death penalty, there is no life, you are simply executed. This topic should not be taken lightly and is unjust for those who are…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime is a part of everyday life and everyone is aware of the threat it possesses, but the question lies in the methods in which it should be dealt with. A major issue in today’s society is whether or not the death penalty is a proper form of punishment. Many people have different opinions on the issue because of its many pros and cons. The arguments against the death penalty show that executions are more expensive than life in prison, the innocent may be wrongly accused, and it is not a deterrent to crime.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays