Preview

Analyze the Effects of Political Compromise in Reducing Sectional Tension in the Period 1820-1861.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
630 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyze the Effects of Political Compromise in Reducing Sectional Tension in the Period 1820-1861.
Douglas Okwu
12-1-2012
Period: 7th

Analyze the effects of political compromise in reducing sectional tension in the period 1820-1861.

During the period of 1820-1861 the north and south debated on issues that dealt with slavery and unbalance power, in order to reduce sectional tension between these two states, the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were proposed.
The North and South both had opposite opinions about slavery, The South favored slavery because of there agricultural based economy which they needed slaves to attend to their harvests and crops, the North was against slavery because they were an industrialized nation they had no need for slavery. This debate went on and almost resulted to a civil war if not for the help of Henry Clay a Great Compromiser who announced a way to solve this issue using the Missouri Compromise, Kansas Nebraska Act, and the Compromise of 1850.
In 1820 the Missouri Compromise also known as the 36,30 was proposed by Henry Clay who intended that this compromise would help solve the issue that the North and South had about slavery which was that any state above the red line was considered a free state and any state below was a slave state, now this actually had a good affect because it reduced the tension for a while, but did not solve future problems that was going to occur between free and slave state.
In the Compromise of 1850 which was a compromise that was intended to solve issues that the Missouri Compromise couldn’t solve, This compromise made California a free state, It banned slave trade in Washington DC, It divided the land that Mexico acquired into two state and made the people decided on rather they wanted it to become a free or a slave state, It made Texas give up the land they acquired and also gave them 10 million dollars to pay their debt to Mexico, It announced that any runaway slaves that was not arrested or brought to the authority, that person would receive a fine of


Bibliography: - http://www.historyplace.com/lincoln/kansas.htm -http://www.historyking.com/American-History/timeline/1803- 1849/missouri-compromise/What-Did-The-Missouri-Compromise-Do.html[->0] - http://mrkash.com/activities/compromise.html - http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h83.html [->0] - http://www.historyking.com/American-History/timeline/1803-1849/missouri-compromise/What-Did-The-Missouri-Compromise-Do.html
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism
    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sectionalism

    The United States was growing and needed to expand and a nationalist feeling had swept the nations as the people wanted a strong and secure nation. As the nation expanded sectionalism escalated over slavery issues which divided the nation into the northern free states and the southern slave states. Each had representatives and senators and the more free or slave states, the more influence they had in the government to preserve slavery abolish it. Almost all in the North wanted to stop the expansion of slavery or even abolish it all together as it was inhumane and violated the Constitution. Almost the entire South wanted to preserve it as it was a positive good and most debates were very heated. The escalation of sectionalism intensified because of the Mexican-American War, the Gold Rush of 1849, and the Fugitive Slave Act.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    compromise of 1850
    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    compromise of 1850

    The Compromise of 1850 After the war with Mexico, there was a lot of unsettled business to take care of. Such as that should the territory gained from the war allow slavery, or should it be declared free? Or maybe the inhabitants should be allowed to choose for themselves? Also, California had recently petitioned Congress to enter the Union as a free state. Should this be allowed? Ever since the Missouri Compromise, the balance between slave states and free states had been maintained; any proposal that threatened this balance would almost certainly not win approval. There was a dispute over land as well. Texas claimed that its territory extended all the way to Santa Fe. Finally, there was Washington, D.C. Not only did the nation's capital allow slavery, it was home to the largest slave market in North America.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Sectionalism
    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Sectionalism

    The very first issue that caused sectionalism in the 1850's between the North and South was the Compromise of 1850. This compromise was a package of bills, passed in the United States in September 1850, regarding the status of territories acquired during the Mexican-American War. It was drafted by Whig Senator Henry Clay and was negotiated with Stephen Douglas in order to avoid secession or civil war in 1850. The Compromise of 1850 caused sectionalism in the Union because it first established California as a free state and turned down the Southern proposal to split California at the 35° parallel; causing the South to be frustrated at the admittance of California. To balance out the annexation of California, the South was pleased to hear that the territories of New Mexico and Utah would have slavery decided with popular sovereignty, meaning that the people who settled there would decide whether or not the territory would be free or slave. Little did they know that they were being cheated, because the land in New Mexico and Utah was unsuited for agriculture and not fit for slave plantations. The biggest blow that caused sectionalism in the Compromise of 1850 was delivered when the Fugitive Slave Law became more strongly enforced. The Fugitive Slave Law basically declared that all runaway slaves must be returned to their masters and anyone who assisted the runaway slave would be arrested. It also gave commissioners ten dollars for every slave that was returned to its master and five dollars for every accused slave released,…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pre-Civil War Apush
    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Pre-Civil War Apush

    In the 1850s, the North and South could not agree on anything and were in constant disagreements. In 1850, Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850. In the compromise, it was said that California would be admitted as a free state which created a stir in the South since it would mean that the amount of Free states and slave states would be unbalanced (Shown in Document B). The North would now have power of the Senate and superiority over the South. The country would give Texas ten million dollars if they gave up claims to Mexico. This would take away a large piece of territory for a relatively low sum. There would be abolition of slave trade in Washington D.C., but not slavery. This meant that emancipation of slavery in the nation’s capital was starting. Also, Mexico and Utah’s slave status rested on popular sovereignty which leaned toward Free State status due to the incompatibility of the plantation system with the environment. Then, there would be a Fugitive Slave Law put in to place which would compel local officials to capture and return runaway slaves along with denying them jury trials, which some congressmen were against (Document F). Daniel Webster also delivered the Seventh of March speech backing this compromise up as everyone else did not like the idea and explained why he thought it was necessary (Document A). This caused the South distress…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Causes of the Civil War
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Causes of the Civil War

    The issue on slavery was one of the causes of the Civil War. Slavery and slave trades had become a big part of the South’s economy. During the 19th Century, the North worked hard on abolishing slavery, which they thought was a disgrace to the Union. Compromises were proposed working toward an end to slavery. One of the compromises was the Missouri Compromise, which made Maine, a free state, and Missouri, a slave state, and everything above the 36° 30 north latitude free. Other compromises such as the Compromise of 1850 did please both sides. The Compromise included admitting California as a free state and interstate slave trade to be abolished which went in favor of the North. The Compromise also went with the South when it included stricter fugitive slave laws in document 7, the Kansas Nebraska Act, made it possible for new states to decide if they were going to be free, or slave states. The North and the South were far from settling the slave issue.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Controversy Before the Civil War
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Controversy Before the Civil War

    When the U.S. finally claimed more land after the Mexican War, the Southern and Northern States slowly began to move farther apart. Even though Northern congressmen supported the Wilmot Proviso, which banned slavery in all new Western territories, the Southern congressmen completely disagreed and went against it. The Compromise of 1850 was set to hopefully smooth these disputes over by supporting the idea of popular sovereignty, western lands having the right to determine by themselves whether they would be free or slave states. The Free-Soil Party also had a big impact. They opposed slavery’s expansion in the Western territories in the late 1840s and early 1850s.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Could The Mexican-American Civil War Been Avoided?
    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Could The Mexican-American Civil War Been Avoided?

    The Missouri Compromise affected the start of the Civil War for different reasons. The major reason was that it divided where slavery was legal or not at a line, known as the 36o30’ line, 36th parallel, or the Mason Dixon line. When Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine entered as a free state. The 36th parallel separated the North from the South, making the North all free states, and the South all slave states. The North and South basically became their own separate countries, but ruled by the same government. Many people wanted to break away from their slave state, and move to a free state, which caused the outbreak of the Civil War.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise Analysis
    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Analysis

    During the time period of 1820 to 1854, major arguments and political actions maintained continuity by maintaining a political strategy of compromise in order to preserve peace and the union as seen in the Kansas Nebraska Act and the Missouri Compromise. But the political actions taken in these two compromises fostered a significant amount of change rather than continuity. Although the Missouri Compromise seemed to settle the big issue by the time of the Kansas Nebraska Act came along the conflict had escalated beyond what Missouri could handle. These arguments and actions eventually resulted in war where the problem of slavery was finally resolved.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH question

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    APUSH question

    Frank Yokas Evaluate the extent to which political compromise contributed to maintaining continuity as well as fostering change concerning sectional tntions in the period of 1820-1861.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War inevitable
    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Civil War inevitable

    By the end of 1854 the two sections, the North (Union) and the South (Confederacy) had reached an impasse and that Civil War was inevitable sooner or later. The conflicts grew tension between the two, the manufacturing section of the North and the agricultural South, which led to Civil War. Between the North and the South there were economic, social and political differences. The North had a number of goals concerning slavery and the South. The North wanted to abolish slavery, stop the spread of slavery in the western territories, and the spreading of slavery in Kansas. And the immediate reason for the Civil War was to save the union. While the South wanted to continue slavery, spread slavery throughout the western territories, and ensure establishment in Kansas territory.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The 1820 Missouri Compromise
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The 1820 Missouri Compromise

    The 1820 Missouri Compromise played a large role in the campaign against slavery. In 1819 Missouri became a statehood and congress considered framing a state constitution, with this a representative attempted to add a anti-slavery legislation with it. This is what started the process of the campaign against slavery. Henry Clay made a large contribution toward this compromise in 1820, with his new ideas on how to settle the conflict between the North and the South, which lasted until 1954.All the compromise's made from 1820's to the Kansas Nebraska compromise in 1854, were all factors which led to the civil war.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sectional Compromises in the 19th Century
    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sectional Compromises in the 19th Century

    First, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 established the slavery line that allowed slavery below it and forbid slavery above it. It also gave the South another slave state in Missouri and the north a free state in Maine. Although each region gained a state in the Senate, the south benefited most from the acquisition because Missouri was in such a pivotal position in the country, right on the border. Later on with the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, Missouri had a big role in getting Kansas to vote south because many proslavery Missourians crossed the border into Kansas to vote slavery. The Missouri Compromise also helped slavery because the line that was formed to limit slavery had more land below the line than above it. Therefore, slavery was given more land to be slave and therefore more power in the Senate, when the territories became state. In effect, the north got the short end of the stick and the south was given the first hint of being able to push around the north. The interesting thing is, the north agreed to all these provisions that would clearly benefit the south.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq: the Success of the Missouri Compromise
    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dbq: the Success of the Missouri Compromise

    DBQ Essay: The Success of Missouri Compromise The Missouri Compromise, one of the most known agreements in American history, was an attempt presented by Henry Clay in calming sectional division between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. While the Missouri Compromise found a temporary solution in regards to representation resulting in twelve free states and twelve slave states(G), it also, however, ignited the strong feelings, opinions, and justifications of two opposing sides and "heralded" the future unsuccess of the Union. No longer could our forefathers postpone such an imminent issue as was done during the infancy of the United States government. The Missouri Compromise was a success in a sense, not merely because of its contents, but rather because it caused people to voice their angered opinions about slavery, unavoidably causing the government to realize the importance of finding a genuine solution to the reality of slavery if the future of America was to survive and truly be united.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Early Nineteenth Century Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible Analyze
    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the Early Nineteenth Century Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible Analyze

    As time passed the rapidly changing society in the nineteenth century, in 1820 the north and south began to have serious conflicting problems that were proved unfixable by compromise. During this time, the north underwent major social, economic, and industrial changes known as the Antebellum Period. While the south generally clung to king cotton and slavery and thus remained essentially the same. This arose a manifold of controversies with how issues such as tariffs, slavery, and land should be handled. Both the Union and the Confederacy tried to create compromises to resolve these problems, yet both sides were never completely satisfied no matter how hard they tried. This made it very close to impossible for them to completely put their differences at ease.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Dbq
    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compromise Of 1850 Dbq

    The compromise consisted of the following five points—(1) writing a new fugitive slave law, since beforehand white citizens could give runaway slaves room and board and not be penalized, therefore appeasing the South, (2) annexing California as a free state to the Union, an advantage to the North, (3) prohibiting the slave trade, but not slavery itself, in the District of Columbia, (4) reorganizing the Mexican Cession into the New Mexico and Utah territories with the slavery issue being decided by popular sovereignty, and (5) declaring a border between Texas and New Mexico, with $10 million in reparations for the territory Texas surrendered…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More