Preview

Analyzation Of Hume Miracles

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1271 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzation Of Hume Miracles
George S. Diaz
17th and 18th Century Philosophy
Professor Mandik

Analyzation of Hume Miracles

In reading the Enquiry, we have to consider on how Hume’s position is on human understanding and how knowledge is obtained will provide a distinct relationship. We know that he believes that humans gain this knowledge through our senses. Hume has provided two phrases on knowledge and how they are provided. He had stated that the experience that we gain is known as “Matters of Fact” and “Relations of Ideas”. Hume is telling us that the “matters of fact” is how we interact with the external world and “Relations of ideas” is from the internal world or the pure thought. Hume has set out a distinction of all references for the study of humans and
…show more content…
Why not those who are living and suffering in other parts of the world? All I thought was that these people just wanted attention or just a herd of liars supporting each other. As a young person we were not to question about god and his powers, if you did you were committing the devils works. How come we are not to question the laws of nature and miracles, these two are conflicting and Hume has provided his work for us to understand this. Miracles are written and had been witness by some of the authors that has written in the bible. Hume stated that we have no reason to believe or consider miracles. In section 12 “In miracles “Hume writes “A miracle is a violation of the laws of nature; and as a firm and unalterable experience has established these laws, the proof against a miracle, from the very nature of the fact, is as entire as any argument from experience can possibly be imagined.”. We are relying on testimony from persons who are either of great importance or not and then it depends on how many witnessed this event. If the miracle is observed from a great or important person do we need witnesses to confirm this truly happened? If those people who are not of importance how many people are …show more content…
His education was through a faith based system that he knew that this information was impounded into his mind. So reasoning was out, he accepted the education he received but felt that learning from the world itself to obtain knowledge was far important. He know that we were all born with reasoning skills that will help us through our lives and education is the key factor becoming knowledgeable. Many faith based individual are not knowledgeable of their minds, they are too into the customs that they have been brought up. This is what shapes their so called reason even it disobeys the laws of nature. This is their capacity of reasoning and unfortunately people who have doubts are considered atheist. This is what Hume encountered in his time, being known as an atheist. Hume only wanted to determine an argument that was from centuries old known miracles, that it was the possibility of falsity of man’s testimonies. Humes Quote from section 2 “Nothing is so convenient as a decisive argument of this kind, which must at least silence the most arrogant bigotry and superstition, and free us from their impertinent solicitations. I flatter myself, that I have discovered an argument of a like nature, which, if just, will, with the wise and learned, be an everlasting check to all kinds of superstitious delusion”. As Hume provided with his views on miracles and not relying on testimonies. From

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Powerful Ideas, An Introduction to Philosophy, aesthetics means "coming from the senses" which is a derivitive of the Greek word, aisthetikos (241). David Hume's believed that emotions are significant in both aesthetics and ethics. In addition, he stated that aesthetics involves both contemplation and judgment. He strongly believes that not everyone is suitable or qualify to judge art.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To start off, I want to be clear and state that I believe that John Locke's thoughts and beliefs on miracles could in principle, be justified. Locke not only gives his personal definitions but, he backs them up with stories and facts. Although there were parts of David Hume's that I wanted to agree with and that truly made me think, I do not believe that his definition and thoughts of a miracle could be justified and I overall do not agree with his thoughts and beliefs of a miracle.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take as an example the story of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead. Firstly, according to the bible, people witnessed the event. Secondly, our experience of nature is that people who are dead do not come back to life. It is true that many people have had near death experience, but once a person has been in a grace or tomb for a day or two they do not come back to life – they start to rot. So this leads to a conflict between a law of nature and the miracle story. Hume’s question would be; which is more likely – that the law of nature has been violated or that the eyewitness accounts are for some reason mistaken? Hume’s conclusion is that miracles do not happen because there is so much clearly testable evidence in favour of the laws of science. Hume’s conclusion is that no testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony of such a kind that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavours to establish.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s arguments were actually responding to the argument as outlined by thinkers such as Plato, Cicero and Aquinas. Hume analyses four of the main premises laid out in a standard Teleological argument and deconstructs them in order to find fault within the logic. The first one that I shall present is Hume’s argument to disparage the claim that one can find only order and good design within the universe. Hume throws the omnipotence and benevolence of God into question when he highlights the fact that there is much suffering and pain and evidence of bad design in the world around us. It is easy to suggest that the world is not harmonious within the workings and regulations of itself and this is shown by the vast amount of suffering, disease,…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume does not think we can compare the creation of the universe to a creation of a car or the creator of the universe to the creator of a car. Hume continues to reject this claim by pointing out that the existence of natural evil and moral evil in the world make it very unlikely that God exists. Hume does not think that with all the natural disasters, threats, attacks, homicides etc. that there can be such a perfect being like God. If God is willing and able to prevent evil than why is there so much evil?…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. According to John Mackie, a miracle is an extraordinary event that’s conclusion is evidence of God’s existence and action within reality. For the event to be called a miracle, there are two requirements needed: a supernatural intervention to cause a violation of the natural world and for the event to have believably occurred, even if low certainty. This is a response to David Hume’s definition of a miracle as an impossible violation of laws. While Hume argue that miracles cannot be unless it can be reinterpreted within natural laws, Mackie state that with a purposeful intrusion from God allows for miracles to happen. Had someone died and came back to life hours later, Hume would state that person wasn’t died and his internal system took…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    David Hume discusses the validation of human testimony as far as miracles which are the base for many religions in Section 10 of his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Hume focuses mostly on Christianity and the miracle of Jesus rising from the dead. Hume argues that humans have no compelling reason to believe in miracles, and that the evidence for miracles is most definitely not enough to base a religion upon them. Human knowledge on miracles is all based on human testimony from those who have claimed to witness said miracles. If human experience is our only evidence for miracles one should also think about the probability of human error.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the eyes of David Hume, God can not be all good, all powerful and all knowing at the same time. This trinity could not exist in the same world that evil exists in. The reason being that there is evil in this world causing misery and suffering. An all powerful God would be able to stop all the misery and…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    David Hume's Miracle

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also, to consider if it happened. Hume continues and says “If the falsehood of his testimony would be more miraculous than the event which he relates, then, and not until then, can he pretend to command my belief or opinion. A reasonable person should not believe in miracles based exclusively on a few testimonies. Hume argues that evidence for what occurs repeatedly always outweighs evidence for that which rarely or never occurs. Since miracles are a rarity and go against our uniform experience, Hume argues reasonable men should never believe in…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second of Hume’s points is that the causal principle is doubtful. His evidence for this is that we can conceive of things without a cause therefore things without a cause are possible this is also backed up by Mackie who says that the causal principle has no evidence and only exists in a methodological sense. However this argument also has severe faults that discredit it. If the arguments from causality are questionable then that means that the arguments from conceivability are questionable as well. This could also mean that a logically necessary truth could be conceived as false if you don’t completely understand it. This opens the problem that just because something is logically possible then that doesn’t mean it could happen in the real world. This basically disables Hume’s ideas on non-causal…

    • 437 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says that when we think about a wound, we automatically think about the pain it can cause. This is the idea of cause and affect. Hume thinks that impressions or beliefs are more firm, lively, forcible and steady. Belief and fiction are the same concept in his mind.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although I disagree with his opinion, Hume exhibits a very sensible argument. David Hume explains four essential circumstances. First of which, Hume believes that God should dispose of all pain. Because both pain and pleasure stimulate humans equally, why should we be able to experience pain? For example, as regular humans we experience feelings such as thirst and hunger, instead of being able to feel the pain of it, we should just be feeling a lack of pleasure. Why is it necessary to feel pain when I simply want to eat or drink something? Secondly, God should eliminate all general laws of nature. For example, if a car crash is about to happen, God should interfere and insure that no person will come to death or extreme injury/pain. Next, God should not dispense talents and abilities unevenly between each of his creations. “God” created animals that obtain optimal strength, ability to fly, and run incredible speeds, while humans are left with minimal physical strengths. God also created people that are talented in sports, making life easier to stay in shape and a possible career by pursuing these particular talents, while there are others who have no special talent and are forced to take extra measures in order to gain fitness and a future career. God should have given equality to all of his creations. Finally, Nature seems to have defects that allow us to see that sometimes…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant

    • 8314 Words
    • 34 Pages

    Hume however, rejected Leibniz's dogmatic assumption that the human mind mirrors the world. Hume acknowledged that we are aware of certain necessary truth not related to experience, but he believed that these thruths are truths bout the structure of a person's mind and not about he external world. He thought the only way we can have knowledge about the world is through our senses. Hume came tho the conclusion that the knowledge we gain about our senses is…

    • 8314 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Better Essays