Preview

Analytical View of People’s Involvement in Constitutional Review Process in Kenya and the Place of Natural Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1638 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analytical View of People’s Involvement in Constitutional Review Process in Kenya and the Place of Natural Law
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI
SCHOOL OF LAW
COMMERCIAL LAW DEPARTMENT

COURSE: LECTURER: PRESENTED BY:

JURISPRUDENCE MS. EVELYNE ASAALA JUSTUS O. OMOLLO

ANALYTICAL VIEW OF PEOPLE’S INVOLVEMENT IN CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW PROCESS IN KENYA AND THE PLACE OF NATURAL LAW

MAY 2013
Page | 0 Jurisprudence

Introduction
J.J. Burlamaqui defined natural law as a rule which so necessarily agrees with the nature and state of man that, without observing its maxims, the peace and happiness of society can never be preserved. Constitutions are deemed to be foundational documents and they assume the status of fundamental law until they are repealed. Natural law has penetrated into constitutions and the process of constitution making. The subject of this discourse is to explore the extent of penetration of natural law or the absence thereof in Kenya’s constitutional review process, placing focus on people’s involvement. Prior to the push for constitutional reforms in Kenya, there were constitutional amendments that ignited distaste among the citizenry. The 1982 constitutional amendment that made Kenya a de jure one party state however sparked off the offensive for constitutional review. The objective was achieved in 1991 following the repeal of Section 2A which restored multi-partism. Following sustained pressure from the opposition and civil society, the Constitution of Kenya Review Commission Act was enacted under the umbrella of the Inter-Party Parliamentary Group (IPPG) reforms. This ushered the formal constitutional review process 1. The Commission began its work of collecting the views of Kenyans between December, 2001 and July, 2002 when the process was temporarily put on hold due to the general elections. Kenya is a democracy in which representatives of the people are elected in a democratic electoral process. Among the elected leaders are the legislators who are mandated by the constitution to make laws. The legal framework for constitutional review was embodied in



References:  Constitution of Kenya 2010, National Council for Law Reporting, Nairobi, Kenya.  Kithure Kindiki, The Emerging Jurisprudence on Kenya’s Constitutional Review Law, Kenya Law Review Vol. 1, at p. 153.  Final Report of the Constitution of Kenya Review Commission, (2004), Nairobi, Kenya.  M.D.A Freeman, Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence, 7th ed, (2001) Sweet and Maxwell, London. Page | 5 Jurisprudence

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Constitution is a set of rules and regulations building up a document that provides explanations regarding the guiding principles of a country and which guarantees all citizens their rights (Amar 27). Many nations of the world have written and implemented their own constitutions. Nevertheless, a constitution is considered to be a living document for several reasons. Therefore, this paper focuses on a discussion of some of the reasons that explain why a constitution is considered a “living document”.…

    • 628 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kiran Shivalingam Sudan GA 6, Legal 10. Bob Shu Turkey GA 2, Economic and Financial 11. Ashwin Utamchandani Turkey GA 6, Legal THIMUN 2012 Issues JOYCE…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The importance of judicial review is uncontested today. That the court system has a role in reviewing the actions of other governmental bodies and ensuring their constitutionality is imperative in the system of checks and balances between the three branches of government in the United States. The question remains, however, as to how far should this judicial power extend. When reviewing a piece of legislation, should the courts stop by merely deciding the constitutionality of the legal writing itself? Should it consider the intentions of the writers? The intention of the legislative voters?…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nowadays, the most diffused constitutional models of judicial review are the American and the European. Both these Constitutional models should be the manifestos of democracy and sovereignty of the people, but it is easily to deny this statement. In fact, we have to take into account that constitutions can be also negative for the consolidation of democracy. For instance, in many cases the authoritarian regimes use the constitution as support for them. Although, a democratic system would be against a certain type of judicial independence since democracies promote a popular participation, judicial review represents a fundamental organ for the protection of human rights and civil liberties.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does majority rule take precedence over general will, or does general will take priority over majority rule? Should citizens be allowed to influence the decision-making processes of a nation? Which political system is best suited for the people of a nation? This paper examines the importance of decision making, as the process impacts all that live within its boundaries.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial review is the process in which the judicial branch of the government, the supreme court, reviews legislation to determine if it is constitutionally valid. Judicial review is crucial to the proper functioning of the government because it keeps the legislative branch of government in check. It prohibits them from passing pieces of legislature that are unconstitutional; keeping the law of the land fair and up to par with the constitution. Without the presence of judicial review any law passed by congress and approved by the executive would stand, regardless of if it violated the rights of the citizens. The Supreme Court is also important because it is significantly less affected by party politics than the other two branches. It remains uninfluenced by politics by having lifetime terms for judges, who consequently serve through multiple administrations. These lifelong terms allow the judges to determine laws without the worry of re-election, something the other two branches are often forced to account for; and commonly allow to affect their policies. While the Supreme Court is influenced by certain factors, such as precedent and ideology, it is the least influenced of all the branches.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Judicial Review

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Whittington, K. (2005). Interpose Your Friendly Hand: Political supports for the exercise Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court [Abstract]. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 583. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/pss/30038966…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. It would be wrong to ignore the question of legitimacy, but it is equally mistaken to behave as if it were the only important issue concerning judicial review of legislation. Other questions should be addressed first. Both critics and defenders of judicial review often proceed on the basis of questionable assumptions about the nature of judicial review. One assumption is that judicial review is always more or less the same activity, and that all forms of judicial review are (therefore) more or less equally legitimate or illegitimate. This paper draws attention to the differences between different forms and methods of judicial review of legislation, before briefly considering how we might decide whether some forms and methods are more legitimate than others. It deals only with primary legislation. Judicial review of subordinate or delegated legislation gives rise to interesting issues, but primary legislation lies at the heart of the argument about the legitimacy of judicial review.…

    • 5008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    judicial review

    • 8745 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Judicial review is usually defined as the judicial power in action or the practical aspect of the rule of law. It is defined as a doctrine according to which courts are entitled, in the exercise of the ‘judicial power’ of the State. The power of judicial review entails the authority to examine and decide the question of the constitutional validity of any law, irrespective of whether it comes from primary or subordinate legislation. Under this power, the judiciary can also question the legitimacy of an action or inaction of a person or body with relation to the exercise of a public function.…

    • 8745 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Austin stated that law is the command of the sovereign. In this case, the people of Kenya are the sovereign. Article 1 of the constitution states that all sovereign power belongs to the people of Kenya and it shall be exercised in accordance with the constitution. The…

    • 1538 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional life in Kyrgyzstan has been rather eventful in light of the relatively little time that has passed since independence. The country has witnessed the introduction of two new constitutions and several constitutional amendments.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democrecy

    • 9465 Words
    • 38 Pages

    References: 1. Agarwal, R.C. 1991. Political Theory. New De4lhi: S. Chand & Company Ltd. 2. Ahmed, Moudud, 1995. Democracy and the challenge of Development. Dhaka: UPL. 3. Halim, M.A. 1998. Constitution Constitutional Law and Politics: Bangladesh Perspective. Dhaka: Rico Printers. 4. Kapur, A.C. 1993. Principles of Political Science. New Delhi: S. Chand & Company Ltd.…

    • 9465 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Master’s Thesis Submitted to School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of Masters of Law (LL.M)…

    • 55531 Words
    • 223 Pages
    Powerful Essays