Preview

Analytical Essay: The Most Dangerous Game

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
503 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analytical Essay: The Most Dangerous Game
English 9A
Analytical Essay The “Hunger Games” on opening weekend brought in $152,535,747 dollars. I believe that I will easy top that, being the great director that I am. I will take Richard Cornell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” and turn it into a worldwide hit. I think that I will bring this short story to life using multiple elements of both movie and fiction! There will be both internal and external conflict. The internal conflict will be between Rainsford and himself. Having to use his resourceful actions in order to outplay General Zaroff. The external conflict will be Man vs. Nature and Man vs. Man. Man vs. Nature will be implied in two major scenes, where Rainsford falls of the yacht and has to fight his way to shore. And the other example of external will be when his leg gets caught in the quicksand. Man vs. Man will be all
…show more content…
When Rainsford first gets to Zaroff’s mansion and Ivan points the gun at Rainsford, when Zaroff hunts Rainsford, and for all the other men that Zaroff had hunted on his island. The significance of conflict is that Rainsford has no other choice, other than being whipped by the brutal force of Ivan, than to be hunted by the sick minded General Zaroff. Whose love for hunting is so extreme he hunts men. Another element I will add to Cornell’s work is key, suspense. Suspense grabs viewer’s attention, and at times makes the audience predictable, tense, and even excited. Suspense will be added to “The Most Dangerous Game” starting when Rainsford goes to Zaroff’s mansion. In the story Rainsford refuses to go into Zaroff’s library, but in the motion picture he will. This scene will be terrifying and full of suspense as Rainsford is lured in and is forced to see all the severed human heads that were once Zaroff’s hunt. This key element will also happen when Rainsford is sent out to hide from Zaroff. Towards the end of the hunt, when Rainsford last trap gets set off and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are two main characters in the story “The Most Dangerous Game.” Rainsford and Zaroff encounter each other when Rainsford was on his yacht headed to hunt in Rio. He falls over board and ends up on an island and the only house on the island belongs to General Zaroff. Zaroff invites Rainsford into his home and is a very good host to him. He offers him food, clothing, and a place to rest, but little does Rainsford know, Zaroff has another plan for him. Zaroff plans to kill him by sending him out to play a “game”. These two characters have many differences, but the also have their similarities.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict in the story that really stood out to me is the Person versus Person from start to finish. Rainsford's…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He changes his thoughts about hunting cause of general zaroff,rainsford using nature to hide from zaroff and builds traps,borsch is a russian soup that has cream on top,that he is wrong cause instinct is a match for something,rainsford did not want to be zaroff partner and wants to be hunted,the example of a game is playing by the rules,he kills animals and humans which makes rainsford rethink his idea of zaroff and wants to get out of there though how will he get back if he has no boat or something else and at the end of the story what will rainsford do if he won the game,which is interesting to think about though the other people that are trapped are…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Connell depicts the characters in The Most Dangerous Game as people who used to be sane but are now insane. While Rainsford is in being hunted by General Zaroff, he is slowly but surely turning into a lunatic in order to keep himself alive. Connell writes, “to this end, he had plunged along, spurred by the sharp rowels of something very like panic”(Connell 28). Connell highlights Rainsford’s transition in becoming deranged with “plunged along” and “spurred by the sharp rowells”. While he could have chose to stay sane, his mind got the best of him,…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Most Dangerous Game” is a suspenseful short story because, of the use of foreshadowing, unique character, and an engaging plot to develop and build the the suspense of the story. The story has some great use of foreshadowing throughout the beginning and the middle parts to make a strong foundation for the story to be engaging. The use of foreshadowing is found within conversations between Whitney and Rainsford. The reason there is foreshadowing is because Rainsford remarks, "Don't talk rot, Whitney," said Rainsford. "You're a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?"(Connell 1) this gives a subtle hint that something negative might happen to Rainsford.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the film, Rainsford and the general start off on the same foot. They are alike. As the film continues, the general differs in his character. He transitions into a cruel and dark figure and loses the softer side of himself. For Rainsford, he learns to become brave. At first, Rainford is seen, experienced in fear and the struggle to survive. His feelings are more sensitive when he undergoes and internal change of the preys feelings. He learns to develop a stronger sense of humor and becomes more…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps one of the reasons that “The Most Dangerous Game” is still read to this day may be because of the ambiguous ending that this short story has. The way the story is left off leads the reader to many different conclusions as to what happened. Perhaps the two most common inferences would be that either Rainsford realizes that he is becoming like Zaroff, or Rainsford realizes that he is nothing like Zaroff and takes comfort in this. There is much evidence that supports both of these theories.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, the external conflict that occurred between him and Zaroff caused Rainsford to no longer be the hunter, but the hunted. While…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One conflict in the book “The Most Dangerous Game” was when Rainsford was upset at General Zaroff. Rainsford was upset because General Zaroff was killing people. General Zaroff was killing innocent people, sailors. Rainsford said “Killing animals is one thing, killing people is another”. General Zaroff would agree to the fact that what he was doing was wrong. “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and if needed to be taken by the strong” said General Zaroff. The General also said “I am strong, how should I not use my gift? If I wish to hunt…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford experiences the most fear he ever has in his life, even though he lives a risky life. He only feels this much fear because, for the first time, his life is truly in danger. Rainsford learns that fear comes only when your life and well-being is threatened.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Analytical Essay 2

    • 1465 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This analytical article is based on the work of Mike Rose and Maya Angelou. The main theme of this essay hovers around the two of the works –“I Just Want to Be Average” and “Graduation” - by Mike Rose and Maya Angelou. Furthermore, a general description of this essay and the relationship between the both is the discussion of this essay. However, this is done with an analysis of the complimentary effect of one on another and ultimately how both of these works make the whole image pertaining to the life of a type school student.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analytical Essay

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Discourses have powerful social effects and can empower some, while marginalizing others. In the texts Lost Property and Muriel’s Wedding the dominant discourse is relationship. The audience is positioned to see Josh Tambling from Lost Property as having tough relationships as he is the one who is expected to pull through. While Muriel Heslop from Muriel’s Wedding is portrayed as unreliable and selfish as the story is told.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Essay

    • 546 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry Ford once said, “Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goal.” In Eudora Welty 's short story "A Worn Path,” a figure of an old African-American woman, Phoenix Jackson, emerges. As she makes her way toward town in a path she seems to have taken many times before, she has to overcome many obstacles. She represents struggle, but most of all she represents determination. Every move she makes seems to be a slow, gradual move towards her goal. The story gives insight to the persistence and boldness of Phoenix Jackson’s life to emphasize the struggle in other people’s lives.…

    • 546 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Short Stories Compared

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most obvious theme of "The Most Dangerous Game" is that which arises from the relationship of the hunter and the hunted. At the very beginning of story, Rainsford and Zaroff are presented as equals. Both characters are well-accomplished big-game hunters. As the story unfolds, however, their roles change. Rainsford is thrust into the position of the hunted. However, he tries to undermine the game by setting traps for the hunter. Rainsford's form of hunting is passive whereas Zaroff's is active.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Essay

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the article “Making the world safe for stupidity”, Leonard Pitts Jr., columnist for The Miami Herald, claims that marketers believe we are “feeble-mindedness” because of the “idiot warnings” that are on most advertisements. Pitts supports his claim by outlining all advertisements that have “idiot warnings” on them. For example he uses “Like a bread-pudding container that says, “Product will be hot after heating.”” This is to show how marketers believe that we are naïve and don’t have common sense. Then, he changes his claim to “Corporate America is to blame because they have damaged the human species”. Pitts’ purpose is to point out that marketers believe we are idiots in order for readers to see why “idiot warnings” were created. He establishes a disappointing and sarcastic tone for his readers to disapprove and laugh with him.…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays