Preview

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1020 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid
Final Paper
12/17/13

Pay for Play is Not the Answer

In recent years, colleges throughout the nation have come across plenty of controversy concerning the idea of whether or not athletes should be paid to play sports in college. To this day the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) deems this a violation of their rules, and that is no matter what the amateur status of the players who make college athletics a billion-dollar business is not going to change (“Associated Press”, 2013). Even though the issue is constantly being debated and to some the answer remains "up in the air" still to this day (Dabad, n.d.), I think the answer is quite simple on why college athletes shouldn’t be paid. There are many reasons
…show more content…
They have top notch, million dollar facilities at their fingertips. They use these for practice, for working out, to study in, eat in and the list goes on. Not to mention all the “free” gear that they wear into class daily to show off that they are an athlete (Rocker, 2013, para. 5). Also, when traveling to games they do not pay for their plane tickets or bus rides. The average expenses per team for men are $13,230,226 (Find the Data. © 2013 FindTheBest.com, Inc.). So clearly, they do see the university’s money, just not in the way they want to see …show more content…
If the NCAA or any college/university put out money to their athletic teams, it would soon result in the players wanting more as a natural reaction. As the saying goes "Give a mouse a cookie... He 'll want a glass of milk" what makes anyone think these athletes would act any different. Most of them are on full scholarships anyhow, and receive refund checks from financial aid. They are already treated as celebrities around campus, and just giving in to more of their wants will just lead to recklessness, and madness. People always want more, and we would eventually have to give them what they wanted just to find balance and cooperation. But the beauty and excitement of college athletics lies right in this irony, a nation drawn to the idea of professional games played by amateurs (Plaschke,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After doing some research over a year ago and taking another look at this issue now, the question about paying college athletes has stayed the same. The debate whether to pay college athletes or not arose in the 1980s after Southern Methodist University was caught paying football players for their services. Upon discovery of these infractions, SMU was administered the “death penalty”, including loss of scholarships and no participation in bowl games for five years. The controversy surrounding paying college athletes seems to have risen from this unfortunate circumstance and has been cultivated into a huge social topic today. Following the SMU scandal in the late 1980s the NCAA rewrote their guidebook that describes an athlete’s role in an academic institution. According to the NCAA, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (NCAA.com). Looking at the arguments made by the NCAA, they make a valid point in showing how athletes are “compensated” for their participation in sports. According to the NCAA, “Many [athletes] receive athletics grants-in-aid that can be…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is simply not enough money for each athlete to be paid. The NCAA also has a policy called Title IX, which basically states that if one athlete gets money, every athlete at that university has to get compensated for the same amount. Meaning that a women’s field hockey player will be granted the same amount as a starting quarterback who fills up stadiums. Once people hear that this would be the reality if college athletes were paid, their opinions may change. The NCAA is huge on ameatur status and if they ever paid student athletes, they would break the golden rule that college athletes have been running on since the beginning of college sports. A few hundred dollars a month for each athlete isn’t going to stop any of the illicit activities involved with collegiate athletics because this isn’t about needing material things. What primarily causes improper benefit violations is greed. Student-athletes break rules because they want something they normally could not have, not because they needed something most other students had.…

    • 2491 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The number one reason why college athletes should be paid is because they deserve it. College student athletes are working hard anywhere between 30 to 40 hours a week to be successful and excellent. On average every college athletic season ranks in between ten and 150 million dollars in revenue and zero dollars are rewarded to the athletes. Recently there was about an 11 billion dollar deal made between the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the television station, CBS. The deal revolved around a popular event in men’s college basketball, March Madness. The deal was that from 2011 to 2024, CBS would be the station to air the three weekend long event, and again, zero dollars go to the athletes making the event possible. March Madness doesn’t exist without the athletes and they receive none of the billions of dollars the event makes. Andrew Luck was a starting quarterback for Stanford University and a Heisman Trophy candidate. Fans came to the Stanford football games just to see him play. People purchased the jersey emblazoned with his name and number from the Stanford gift shop and he made absolutely no profit from this. Everything went to Nike and the University itself. Andrew Luck is just one example among the many college student…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Playing a college sport is like a full time job, except the lack of financial benefits. College football and men’s basketball generate revenue of more than $6 billion every year, yet no money goes toward paying the people that make the sports possible (Bagaria). College sports would be non-existent without the devoted athletes who work hard and spend countless hours each and every day. Whether practicing, training, or playing in games, these athletes are involved in their sport all seven days of the week. College athletes put in almost the same amount of work as professional players do, but instead of making millions, rather they are receiving no financial benefits (Bagaria). College athletes deserve to be paid because they sacrifice so much for their team and deserve compensation. Secondly, college athletes not only deserve money because of their devotion, they also need it for their everyday life. During their athletic season, they do not receive any sort of payment for their efforts which would aide them financially and in everyday life (Bagaria). Most scholarships cover cost of housing and textbooks, but leave out basics such as food. Logically athletes need food, but their time and energy is spent on a “job” as an athlete…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The issue with universities paying athletes to play is that the focus is entirely on what the players are doing for the universities, generating revenue. What seems to be forgotten is…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should we pay college athletes? That is a big topic in NCAA sports right now. People think that college athletes work hard and that they deserve to get paid. Michael Wilbon is one of these people. At first he was against paying college athletes, but now he is all for it. He says that he is interested in seeing the people that make revenue share a little piece of it. Then you have people like a reporter from the Daily Evergreen. He is against paying the athletes. He states that when you are a student athlete it is student first and athlete second, and that if you start paying college athletes it will put being an athlete first. I strongly think that college athletes shouldn’t be paid for playing sports in college. Paying players to play sports in college can cause players to ruin their career, cause the NCAA to be one sided, and would take away scholarships.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A problem with paying college athletes is the damage it would cause to the athletes themselves. We look at college athletes and we see big guys, but not a lot of people remember that they are STUDENT-ATHLETES!! There is no real reason why we…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Athlete compensation

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The idea of paying college athletes has been an ongoing debate since the early 1900s. With current television revenue resulting from NCAA football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, there is now a commotion for compensating both football and basketball players beyond that of an athletic scholarship. Because of the title “Student-athlete”, college athletes have the obligation to be a student first, and an athlete second and should not be paid to play.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some colleges, college athletics are a key source of income, and they attract students to their institutions. Universities depend on their athletes to produce and maintain the popularity of their school's name. College athletes are suppose to be the best of the best on that level, so why do college athletes not get paid? The National Collegiate Athletic Association, NCAA, says that it is trying to protect the athletes from "exploitation by professional and commercial enterprises" (Brawn). Many argue that student athletes should not be paid because they are receiving an education through a scholarship. These people feel that the promise of their education being paid for is enough for the college athletes. On the opposite side of this topic, people argue that the college athlete generates enough income for the universities, and they feel that the university owes the athletes more than a scholarship. Student athletes should be given a small amount of pay for their services to the university.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The involvement of agents and boosters in collegiate level sports has become a major topic amongst headlines in news recently. If you were to pick any athletic program at random it is most likely that they have committed some sort of a violation. Many people argue that college athletes should not be paid because they receive scholarships that pay for their meals, housing, tuition, books, and so on. At some universities, these scholarships equal up to $200,000 over a four year period. Although it would seem as though these scholarships pay for most of an athletes college expenses, they really do not. Many athletes need help in order to pay for other things such as: food, transportation, clothes, and other daily needs. The bigwigs making the rules for the NCAA are well off individuals who have most likely never lived on a budget. Being a collegiate athlete is a full time job along side with completing their schoolwork, which does not leave very much time for the athlete to have an external form of income leaving them on a tight budget. Collegiate athletes should be able to receive extra benefits and compensation when necessary if it is regulated by the NCAA and not done under the table.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Paying Student Athletes

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Gibson, M. (2013, Jan. 10). End the ncaa’s long con: why the student-athlete should be paid…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The colleges as well as the NCAA are exploiting these athletes. Many believe that the NCAA is breaking the United States antitrust law. With athletes committing countless hours of work, they are falling back in school, and not working towards the degree they are supposedly at that college for. These athletes are devoting to their college sport in hope of going to the NFL, NBA or the MLB. If they don't make it to a professional level, most student athletes will not receive a degree. In the article "Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes," by Dennis Johnson and John Acquaviva claims that "They come here and are treated like royalty. Until they break a leg or get put on the second string and they get set aside. Many don't earn a degree. They don't have the training or the skills to be independent after they leave the university." The quote pulled from the article shows that when a star athlete gets hurt on the field or court, they are pressed aside. Star high school athletes that are brought to a top college then pushed down the line, most don't earn a degree, even the athletes who get hurt don't earn a degree at the end of their college years. This problem all comes down to the athletes that are putting in hard work for their school, with the mindset that playing football, basketball or baseball will be their future job at the…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Are athletes at Division 1-A colleges amateurs or are they really professionals? This question is argued by many people throughout the nation. Some say it’s unfair to others but some also say that it is a necessity for these athletes. With these athletes being full time students while playing sports, they don’t have any opportunities to make money. There are three specific reasons on why college athletes should get paid: It will pay for more than just textbooks, players give up their body for their school, and the NCAA makes money, so the players should too!…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The National Collegiate Athletic Association, or better known as the NCAA, has been around for over 100 years, and in that time, it has been the governing organization for millions of college athletes. In recent years there has been major discussion recently pertaining to if college athletes should or shouldn't be paid while they are in school. The notion that whether college athletes should be compensated has been floating around for years. I believe that colleges should, in some way, pay athletes that represent their school. With current television revenue resulting from NCAA football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, intercollegiate sports have brought in a surplus of revenue to their respective Universities, as well as increasing…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Not all colleges have enough money to cover all expenses for all their athletes. Although athletics is a very important part of the culture and attraction to a university, the income it brings in usually doesn’t outweigh the costs of running the programs. Parts of that cost are the salaries of people on the athletic staff, who are already do not get paid enough as is. The athletic staff, who makes everything possible, is the machine that keeps the programs running and the organization smoothly, and is who needs to get the money first. If they cannot be paid at a reasonable salary, then where is this money going to come from for the athletes? Most schools just simply cannot afford…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays