Analysis: The Reconstruction Of St. Denis

Reorder and reword conclusion. The reconstruction of St. Denis is much like the making of a work of art. The painter has a voice and a calling for each stroke. With every selection of shape, material, and color the painter is making a choice in which to display the voice of his work. He controls the mood the focal point and the statement it be will voiced to the audience. For Suger, St. Denis was his work of art. Understanding his influences and the intended statement behind his work allows us as views to distinguish and evaluate the symbols and voice in which Suger has masterfully designed for the walls of St. Denis. With the thorough analysis of the influences and inspiration guiding Suger we can look deeper into the structure and redesign to understand how these influences were implemented. For further analysis of the influences implications we will be focusing strictly on the first and second phase of the reconstruction. Within in each phases the influences pressing on Suger are highly evident and require further context to completely understand the depth and value of these symbols among the masonry and windows. To evaluate the context surrounding the symbols I have sought to find the answers within the question of Abbot Suger himself.
Denis.