Preview

Analysis Of The Katz Case Of Katz V. United States

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
225 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of The Katz Case Of Katz V. United States
According the Fourth Amendment, “protection applies only to situations where an individual has a subjective expectation of private that society willingly recognizes as reasonable” (Maras, 2015, p. 84). Thanks to the decision in the Katz v. United States case, the “reasonable expectation of privacy” test is used to established when law enforcement are allowed to conduct a search that does not violate one’s privacy (Maras, 2015). Information that is meant to be private and is contained in technology devices can be protected under the Fourth Amendment because the person’s intentions are to keep the information from the public (Maras, 2015). For example, in the Katz case there was a phone conversation that was admitted as evidence, but later found

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Katz (the appellant) was convicted under an eight-count indictment, charged with transmitting wagering information by telephone from Los Angeles to Miami and Boston. The evidence, telephone conversations overheard by the FBI agents with an attached electronic listening and recording device, to the phone booth Katz used. The Court of Appeals rejected the contention that the recordings had been obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The supreme court case Carpenter v. United States is arising the question of whether the warrantless search and seizure of cell phone records revealing the movement of the user over the course of 127 days. After four people were arrested for a series of armed robberies, one confessed and gave his phone number as well as the others. As a result of this more chargers were placed on Carpenter for interfering with interstate commerce, because of the Hobbs Act. This case is using the fourth amendment and arguing that his phone being searched was an “unreasonable search or seizure”. I think that the US or FBI is right in this case, since Carpenter had already committed multiple armed robberies and the information was provided by another person who…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Smith v. United States, the plaintiff, John Angus Smith, was convicted of engaging in drug-trafficking, which would have granted him a five year sentence had he not “used” a firearm in regards to the incident. As stated in statute 924(c)(1), the use of firearm in relations to a drug-trafficking crime enhanced the sentence, and turned it into a 30-year sentence. The argument at hand is whether the term “use” was to be taken from a broad dictionary definition or in the ordinary meaning. The majority of the court argued that the term “use” should not be limited to the intended use of the firearm (as a weapon) as they exemplified cases of which the firearm was used as a bludgeon even though that was not it’s intended purpose, yet…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It was determined that the plaintiffs failed to show any part of the statute led to a denied admission to any non public school on racial or religious grounds. So the complaint of violating the 14th amendment was not discussed and dismissed for lack of standing.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before 2004, courthouses and other public buildings differed from how they are today. There was one thing that these buildings did not have, a handicapped entrance. At this time, it could be very embarrassing to be handicapped because you could do nothing for yourself. If you wanted to enter a public building, you had to ask someone to carry you in, or even worse, you might have to crawl up stairs to enter! This was a definite problem that had been around for years, however, no one addressed it.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. McCleskey was a Black man, that was convicted of two counts armed robbery and one count of murder in the Supreme Court of Fulton County, Georgia. His convictions were due to the robbery of a furniture store and the killing of a white police officer while the robbery was occurring. There was evidence presented at trial that proved one of the bullets to be from a .38 caliber Rossi revolver, which fit the description of the gun McCleskey was carrying, and two witnesses who had heard McCleskey had admitted to the shooting.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case: Goldberg, Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York v. Kelly et al. (1970)…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally believe that the meaning of a “well-regulated militia” is when citizens are properly following the laws and abide the rules of bearing arms. Militia can be defined as, “An army composed of ordinary citizens rather than professional soldiers” according to Gary the Gun Nut’s post on Thomhartmann.com. In the District of Columbia v. Heller case, gun control was the purpose problem. The case resulted in protecting the “Second Amendment of an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home,...” in which was a 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    briana

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the court case of Katz v. United States. Charles Katz, was charged with conducting illegal gambling operations across state lines in violation of federal law. In order to collect evidence against Katz, federal agents placed a warrantless wiretap on the public phone booth that he used to conduct these operations. The agents listened only to Katz's conversations, and only to the parts of his conversations dealing with illegal gambling transactions, wiretapping a public phone booth is in violation of the fourth amendment the Supreme Court stated that “4th Amendment protects the people and not certain areas against search and seizure”. Without this amendment people would have no claim over their personal privacy, or security. Any officer could enter homes and take any evidence that could be used to make an arrest or that could be used for prosecution in court.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution states: Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause. This amendment impacts law enforcement because police need a warrant to make arrests and searches. This is not applicable if the officer has first-hand knowledge of an event and the evidence is likely to be destroyed or the subject will abscond if time is taken to get a warrant. If a warrantless search is made by the police that should have been made only after a warrant was issued, then all knowledge gained by that evidence is not allowed in testimony.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourth Amendment does not allow searches of personal items unless a warrant is used, but by tracking information on people it could help detect terrorism threats sooner. For example, President Obama claims that the data-collection programs “help prevent terrorism (Transcript: Obamas Remarks 4.3).” Even though people do not need a warrant to use these programs, people examine the phone numbers and length of calls, and by doing this it could ultimately protect the country from terrorism threats. Also, the U.S. Patriotism Act enables law enforcement agencies to search through “email and telephone communications, medical, financial, and library records (Legal Information Institute 1.1).” Furthermore, whenever the intelligence gathering community…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment rights

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Individual rights under the Fourth Amendment can make or break a case in trial. According to the Fourth Amendment, “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” This is a United States citizens Fourth Amendment right equally protected to all. This protects the people from the State and Federal Governments within their privacy. The Fourth Amendment also advises that a Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) must have probable cause before seeking a warrant. Probable cause is when there are enough facts, or totality of the circumstances, that a crime has happened. The LEO if seeking for a search warrant must state in the warrant what it is they will be searching for. For example, if an LEO seeks a search warrant for stolen property; the LEO must only check items in the house which could be stolen; i.e. televisions, computers, vehicles etc. The LEO checking a thumb drive, not putting on the warrant to check that equipment, which contains child pornography, would be an illegal search and seizure. Unfortunately, the defendant in this situation would have the evidence suppressed due to the illegal search.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary purpose of this act was to allow the government surveillance of people in an effort to prevent terrorist attacks. The federal, state, and local governments have described their monitoring of internet usage as only a form of a safety precaution in hopes of protecting their citizens. This power that was granted to the United States government from the Patriot Act is only used when necessary in cases where suspicion is raised, and then they may subpoena information from the internet provider or obtain a search warrant. Title II of the Patriot Act allows the search to be executed with a search warrant, but the suspect does not need to be informed until after the search, nor do they need to be present during the search. This, however, does not contradict the Fourth Amendment because of the Stored Communications Act of…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The fourth amendment violates unreasonable seizures and searches” (Kopp 1). I think if you do not give law enforcement access to your information, you have something that you are hiding. Even if it isn’t anything to make you a criminal, you have something to hide. Even though you have the right to your privacy, most of the time, law enforcement doesn’t just want to search your data for no reason. If they really want to get the information and have the right reasons, they are going to get the access, whether you give it to them or not. “That interaction between cell sites and phones lets wireless carriers log and store details including a call’s time, date, and length” (Greenemeir 1). When they have the access and search your phone, they can look at literally everything they want in your phone, once access is approved. Therefore, if you gave them a reason to look into it in the first place, you might as well give them your consent to look through your information so they can find what they…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays