Analysis Of The Dupont's Experience For Cloning Dogs

Now, although that the article describes detailly the Duponts experience for cloning their dog, it denoted in an obvious way their own desires and egoism. The Duponts, in some way, tried to justify all the efforts with their love for their pet, but it is clear that the would never have been satisfied because at the end they mentioned the idea to clone their cloned dogs to their grandson. This fact does not necessarily imply that Duponts are evil people, but they do not imagine the magnitude of what they are promoting behind Sooam Biotech that is the company wich offers the service. At the same time, the suspects from animal defensors were partially confirmed by Hyun declarations because it evidences, in a poor form, the degree of careless and unrespect for animal life. Also, it is uncertain the quantity of animals, embryos, egg donors and surrogate mother used in the procedures because just a little part of the experiment results are published.
A sample of those few studies published corroborates the experimental dogs situation, so the paper “Lessons Learned from Cloning Dogs” published on Domestic Animals Scientific Magazine in 2012 by a scientific group gave to the public numbers and concise data about dog cloning at that time. The principal reason to mention these study is because in there exists a lot of veridical information
First of all, this organization is embroiled in initiatives and campaigns in favor of animals, so there are two main information facts related to the topic. The first is a factsheet about animal cloning that in its content the majority is full of qualitative data about negative affections caused by dog cloning, and the second provide to the readers the overestimation about overpopulation that also is affected by commercial dog cloning (Humane Society of the United States,