President Donald J. Trump has certainly been one of the most controversial and outspoken candidates in United States history, and given that reputation one would expect nothing less from him for his inaugural address. While one could certainly decide how well Trump’s speech went based on party affiliations, most Americans will analyze the speech itself for the answer. By understanding Aristotle’s three modes of persuasion ( logos, ethos, and pathos) one can investigate how much of a success Trump’s speech truly was.…
“Every individual should receive what is due to him or her. It’s a simple question of fairness.”1 Unlike many people of his time, Trudeau was a truly unique prime minister who believed in a just society for every Canadian citizen. Thanks to his faith and endurance, we as the citizens of today can hold our heads high with pride. Pierre Elliot Trudeau’s vision of a just society with reference to multiculturalism, rights and freedoms for all and bilingualism are evident in society today.…
Stephen Harper was elected in 2006 as our Prime Minister of Canada. Since the time he was elected, The Conservative Party and the leader, Stephen Harper have improved Canada and developed the country into more settled through these changes.…
Cited: Blake, Raymond Benjamin. Transforming the nation: Canada and Brian Mulroney. Montreal: McGill-Queen 's University Press, 2007.…
My paper is about how many people have their own opinions about what being an American is. To complete my research I looked at various articles and videos to really see what everyone thinks. The American voice to me is that we should be able to have freedom and we should have many opportunities to do what we want. In my opinion, I believe that Barack Obama is the best representation of America because he seems like he really cares about even the future of America. Being in American to me means that we have rights to be what we want to be. No other place has what America has, and that is life, liberty and equality.In my paper I will be talking about how different people view the way America, or what is to be American to…
On June 16th at his very own Trump Tower in New York City, Donald Trump announced that he would be running for president. It was only thirty seconds into his speech when Trump committed his first fallacy. In an attempt to insult the intelligence of his fellow GOP candidates, he compared their incompetence toward air conditioners to their supposed inability to beat ISIS. “They didn’t know the air-conditioner didn’t work,” “How are they going to beat ISIS?” This is a bad example fallacy due to his use of an example that fails to prove the conclusion and has little connection to it. Despite the complete lack of relation between Trump’s example and his conclusion, he was still able to provoke the audience into feelings of contempt toward the other…
“Pierre Elliott Trudeau .” The Prime Ministers of Canada. 7th Floor Media, n.d. Web. 15 Dec. 2010.…
Pierre Elliot Trudeau is known as one of the greatest political figures in Canada’s history. He touched the lives of many Canadians, inspiring them to believe they were capable of accomplishing many things. Trudeau’s successes impacted greatly on Canada, and his efforts will be remembered by future Canadian generations. During his time of influence, Trudeau gained the respect of the majority of the Canadian population. His popularity to the public began a great phenomenon because “he did what no politician before or since has done: he touched the dreams of an entire generation of Canadians”1 Mr. Trudeau’s fame and popularity was named Trudeaumania by the media. With the support of his Canadian citizens, Trudeau accomplished many tasks, which positively affected Canada, perhaps forever. Pierre Elliot Trudeau was a great Prime Minister because he balanced the equality between the French and English Canadians, promoted multiculturalism to help Canada’s independence grow stronger, and he passed many acts and bills that made a great impact on Canada to grow as a nation.…
When delivering the Gettysburg Address, Lincoln concluded by stating, “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth” (Lifehack). Due to the relevance of that one line, his words remain widely circulated to this day. Trudeau himself made some memorable statements throughout his victory speech, such as “politics doesn’t have to be negative and personal to be successful” ("Justin Trudeau Victory Speech: In Canada, Better Is Always Possible - Federal Election 2015 |FULL"). Like Lincoln, Trudeau used simple words to bring up a point his audience believed in, thus creating a memorable quote. Harper, on the other hand, makes very few defined statements and they all fail to encompass the timeless quality Trudeau incorporates in his…
Do you feel your government is fair? Does it manage the issues properly, with careful thought, and an open, objective mind? Is it effective? Do you feel that the Senate is a “sober chamber of second thought?” Do you feel that the best interests of the Canadian public are always preserved in the current model of our governance? If so, you’re mistaken. Under our present governance, we have two houses, the House of Commons, and the Senate, the reform to the latter being the main topic of this essay.…
Following the outbreak of World War One in 1914, Canada has had fifteen different Prime Ministers. Of those fifteen, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau has has had the…
All through his career in politics, Pierre Trudeau was able to introduce skills through which he was able to break all the barrier. It’s evident that Pierre Trudeau was an ideal political figure in Canada because he progressively fought to keep Quebec in Canada, helped the growth of Canada’s independence internationally, and passed many acts and laws that guaranteed the safety and freedom of Canadians. Therefore, Pierre Elliot Trudeau was the most significant post-WWII prime minister because his innovative policies assisted the growth of Canada as a…
Ever since the dramatic 1995 referendum, specifically, the degree of division it portrayed, Quebec became not only a discussion point, but a category of discussions questions. Ranging from debates in educational mediums, to Prime Minister election debate topics. We haven’t seen, as much dialogue regarding separatism recently, however, how a candidate speaks of their policies/views towards Quebec can either secure their victory as seen in the 2015 Federal election of Justin Trudeau. Or be a reason of their loss, as seen in the 2011 Federal election which sent the Liberals to third party status, duo to their horrendous results in Quebec ridings. However, the Trudeau article does more than just talk about Quebec separatism, but the federalist system in its entirety. Trudeau, in offering a last resort to the problems facing Canadian unity, also points out a fundamental issue of federalism. While doing so, however, also provides a solution, of Canada returning to its foundational constitutional principle of reason. Regarding the approaches of Quebec analysis, Trudeau on one hand focused some portion of the essay on every aspect, however, the essay was heavily: historically, institutionally, and social cleavage focused. While Rocher, was more focused on the: historical and psychological levels of…
The current Prime Minister of Canada- Justin Trudeau (the eldest son of Pierre Trudeau- previous Prime Minister of Canada). In 2007, Trudeau chose to battle in the locale of Papineau for the Liberal Party designation. He won the assignment with a huge lion's share vote and went ahead to win the Papineau decision the following year. From that point, his political vocation picked up footing: between 2008 – 2009, he turned into an individual from parliament of the Official Opposition, he led the Liberal Party's national tradition, and he turned into the gathering commentator for issues like youth, multiculturalism and migration. In 2015, Trudeau at long last looked for the most elevated authority position in…
Donald Tump’s wife faced some accusations that she plagiarised Obama’s speech. However, her speech seemed honest and well-introduced which was the reason why it became controversial. What Melania did had a huge negative influence on many students. It known that plagiarism is not allowed in any school so Melania showed the opposite. So people started comparing her action with student’s action. As the students receive an F for plagiarising, Trump’s wife should also face the consequences of what she did.…