Preview

Analysis Of Exploring Ethics By Peter Singer

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
253 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Exploring Ethics By Peter Singer
I would agree that, “If you can prevent something bad from happening at a comparatively small cost to yourself, you are obligated to do so.” Peter Singer is a philosopher who believes that we have an obligation to help those in need. I agree with his statement from the book Exploring Ethics that, “It is not beyond capacity of the richer nations to give enough assistance to reduce any further suffering to very small proportions.”(Singer pg.244 ) He believes that rich nations can help either as individuals or as a group, to prevent those less fortunate from starvation and reduce their misery without sacrificing anything of comparable significance. He describes comparable significance as “without causing anything else comparably bad to happen,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Toward the end of the movie, Mark Ruffalo’s character, Mike Rezendes, flips out dramatically about getting this story out to the public to make sure no other kids become victims.(2015) The head editor on the team, Robby Robinson, tells Rezendes to be patient that they aren’t just going after the individuals, they are going after the system. Robinson makes this ethical decision based on that he doesn’t know what will happen in the future, but if they just release the priest's names the same thing will occur over and over. The only way Robinson states will cure this terrible tragedy, is if they bring down the whole system who is in charge. Being a journalist, Robinson uses his ethical code to make sure he can get a reliable source that is an…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Eugene V. Deb

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Every person is morally obligated to help others to help fellow man but you are always personally obligated to help yourself before helping others.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article, “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, philosopher Peter Singer observes that that there are millions of people around the world who are leading misery lives and suffering death, because of famine , war, lack of shelter, and adequate medical care. He states that although rich nations have contributed great sums of money for these causes, they are still not giving enough in comparison to their Gross National Product (GNP). He points out that many nations only contributes about one percent of their GNP.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article on famine, affluence, and morality, morally Peter Singer states that people who live in rich countries are morally obligated to ease the burden of famine and overpopulation for poorer countries. Singer states that rich countries can alleviate unnecessary suffering and death in poor countries by giving famine relief, and at the cost of a “morally insignificant” lessening of standard of living for the rich country. Singer also notes that this giving of famine relief should not only occur during dire emergency situations, but on a long-term basis, as well. Singer presents his justification for his reasoning in the form of an anecdote: if you were to walk by a pond where a small toddler was drowning it would be morally wrong to not…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within his work, Peter Singer presents an argument that the people who live in affluent countries, the developed world, must drastically change their way of life and their conception of morality in order to help those in need. He begins by giving us an example of a case of famine, Bengal 1971, where people have been suffering and no one was doing anything to even try to alleviate the problem, this includes the government. I have summarized his arguments in the following ways: 1. Suffering caused by the lack of food, shelter, and medical care services is bad, and 2. If we can prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing something…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For those who frightened much to abandon their life, goals, projects and interests in order to save one’s life, say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, also in “ the life you can save”, Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer, Giving, sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction, it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises, “1, suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad, (2), if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening,…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer Is Wrong

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe that we are morally free to live the life we want and pursue our own interests, at least to some extent, and this entails that we are morally permitted to dedicate our energy, time, and capital to activates that don’t involve any direct impact on famine relief or similar causes.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual actions are to support the goal of protecting the United States as a whole. A soldier who qualifies as an expert with the M-4 rifle is an example of virtue theory. The excellence of this soldier will increase the effectiveness of the team or company similar to utilitarianism. Obeying a direct order is part of the foundation of the Army. Shooting to kill in combat can go against an individual’s morals and ethics but deontology states duty is the primary factor regardless of individual belief.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is an irrefutable fact that we should help each other. However sometimes help to others poses some danger to either us or others. In Peter Singer's essay "Famine Affluence, and Morality" Peter Singer argues that we ought, morally, to prevent starvation due to famine. Singer begins by saying that assistance has been inadequate as richer countries prioritize development above preventing starvation. Singer then states that "suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad" (404) and assumes that it is uncontroversial enough to be accepted without justification. He then next raises the linked premise that we morally ought to prevent something 'bad' from happening as long as we have the means and it does not entail compromising on anything of 'comparable moral significance', using the analogy of a drowning child and hence assuming the principle _of "_universalizability" (405). As Singer writes, he attempts to justify why he feels that it is within our means to do so without sacrificing anything morally significant, and concludes that we hence morally ought to prevent starvation due to famine.…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” written by Peter Singer, Singer’s goal is to convince people that our decisions and actions can prevent other countries from suffering. He suggests that people should do what is morally right by contributing financially to aid those who are starving, rather than purchasing “wants” for those who can afford it. Singer argues his position, provides counter-arguments, and explains his concepts for aiding countries in need.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response to Peter Singer

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Everyday wealthy and middle class Americans across the country spend money on luxury items such as: flat screen televisions, laptop computers, digital cameras, fancy cars, and smart phones. At the same time, across the globe in poverty stricken countries, people and children are living in destitution. Many of these people lack a basic human need which commonly includes nutrition, healthcare, education, clothing, shelter, and clean water. Peter Singer, author of 'The Singer Solution to World Poverty', suggests that all Americans that are financially stable to donate should be donating all their non-essential money to the needy people across the globe. This seems like the morally right thing to do, however Singers argument overlooks many factors in his bias, and leaves to many questions unanswered to make his essay true or reasonable to any extent. Is it morally right to make a hardworking American give up all luxuries to the needy people they will never meet? Of course, Americans should feel the need to donate to the needy people of our world. Although the amount they donate should be entirely up to them.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that many people around the world are suffering due to lack of resources within their countries? Some wealthier people and nations decide not to help these less fortunate people as they would rather spend money on frivolous things and think that it’s not their obligation. I believe that man has a moral obligation to help those less fortunate than him, though I believe that it is not morally right to only help those who are less fortunate just to make you feel like a better person.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    • His opinion is too drastic a revision of the current moral scheme – This argument states that most people are firmly entrenched in their opinions as to how much help is enough and have already made up their mind as to how helping others fits into their moral scheme. Many people in developed nations feel that they are obligated to help others, but will only go as far as their moral development will allow them to. It is easy for those who have plenty to feel a sense of entitlement and expect that others can do the same if given the opportunity.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays