Preview

Analysis of Aristotle's Aim of Man

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis of Aristotle's Aim of Man
Eng Comp 101
Aristotle’s The Aim of Man Essay What is the meaning of life? What is the point of life and consciousness? What is your ‘end?’ Aristotle says happiness is the be all, end all; the final destination; the key to existence. In his books, he defines happiness as the most righteous good that man’s actions can achieve. It is the one true end that all our behaviors and choices aim. Fuck that. Why must happiness be the greatest, highest, most purposeful end in life? That’s an awfully selfish thing to say. The idea that ‘being happy’ is the end to which all human life and conscious strive is preposterous. Regardless of what he means by happiness, Aristotle is wrong because happiness is not universal happiness is vague, and happiness isn’t the basis for defining yourself. Aristotle, in his Nichomachean Ethics books, states that happiness is the end that every man aspires to, also attempting to clearly define happiness. His overall point was that, contrary to modern definitions, happiness is an activity. The contemporary concept of happiness is an emotion or emotional state. This difference is a key part in understanding Aristotle’s logic and reasoning. According to Aristotle, happiness is actively living a virtuous life and pursuing their happiness. Notwithstanding the definition, happiness remains an ambiguous subject. The degree or manifestation of happiness varies wildly between two people even in the same social classes, and more drastically so in vastly different social circles. Happiness goals change with movement through belief systems and social classes This is displayed by taking a macro look at the world’s religions and cultures. For example, a Buddhists in China, Thailand and other Asian countries have many more and different rules pertaining to how to achieve a happy life, versus the middle class American who’s capitalist dreams don’t extend beyond getting rich quick. Secondly, Aristotle’s definition of happiness is rather vague. From what I

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Book I, Aristotle mentions that happiness is an end goal and “one day, or a short time, does not make a man blessed and happy”. In agreement with this statement, happiness is something that takes time and each person should strive for it every day. Road blocks are bound to occur and bad days will happen. By keeping the end goal in mind, it makes it easier to avoid getting stuck in a rut. Within Book I, Aristotle also questions whether or…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle was a greek philosopher who wrote the book “Nicomachean Ethics”. Aristotle’s view of human natures centers around humans achieving happiness. Too him happiness is our highest goal in life. Aristotle points out that most people in this world have a false view of what happiness really means. Most think of it as physical pleasure like eating, sex, or honor. These people have an imperfect view of what it means to be alive and what it means to be happy. The reason people have a false idea of happiness is because they lack virtue. Virtue is behaving in the right manner. Such as being courageous in life or being a coward. If one is courageous they will find happiness in being such while the coward would find happiness in the opposite but that is a false happiness. Aristotle takes the reader through the true meaning of being alive. He talks about many different aspects of achieving the good life and being happy; he stresses on topics like eudaemonia, classes of goods, and our telos and function in this world.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy 120w

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Looking at the world as a big picture and everyone who is in it, they all seem to strive for the same thing in life, happiness. Happiness or Eudemonia as Aristotle calls it, is created through the process of combining five different components. These are the following components: Human function, the rational part of the soul, habituation, character, and virtue. Since our society craves happiness and views it as the best achievement we could have, Aristotle described it as the ultimate end.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle believes that people's actions are governed through their desire to achieve happiness. According to Aristotle, the purpose of human life is by happiness through living your life entirely by your actions as an individual on…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nicomachean Ethics, states that Happiness is virtuous activity that fulfills the human’s proper function which brings pleasure. However, our ultimate end isn 't pleasure; if it were, we 'd be no better than the animals. Aristotle believed that physical pleasures tempt us with excesses and lead us away from virtue and happiness (Aristotle, 2009).…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dalai Lama Happiness

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In order the answer the question of what happiness is and where to find it the Dalai Lama suggests an optimistic spiritual path to find it to introduce readers to the subject in his article, “New Ethic for a Small Planet”, while Andrew Guest’s “Pursuing the Science of Happiness” reviews different findings of researches in several fields as well as his own. Reading these two together, with the Dalai Lama’s article first and Guest second, readers can gain a holistic view of the topic and a tangible method for achieving both individualist happiness and a collaborative wellbeing for the global society.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In book 1, Aristotle calls the ultimate end (or telos) eudaimonia, which is commonly translated as happiness, but also as success or fulfillment. (1097a28-34). He proposes that we ought not to regard happiness as a property, but as a goal for the sake of which we act. So Aristotles' examination of happiness is a practical one, practical because he not only wants us to befall upon a theory of what happiness actually is, but his approach is guided by the thought that such an end is nothing less than the object of all rational action. Aristotle proposes that the first step we can take towards acquiring a successful life, is to realise what good action consists in, and to use this to guide us in our pursuits. He goes on to say that we should use the criteria of this supreme good to 'evaluate (other) goods, such as pleasure, wealth, honour, moral virtue, and philosophical contemplation' (Lear, G.R Happy Lives and the Human Good,1.1)- we are to take these to be the keys to…

    • 6148 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Research Paper

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Humans have a purpose unique that is different from any other form of life. Aristotle states that this purpose is essential in being human and to achieve what is considered by the philosopher to be the absolute good, happiness. In Book 1 of Nichomachean Ethics Aristotle introduces us to these concepts along with what happiness is and how to truly achieve it. I agree with the majority of these claims, and can see them in day to day life, but I do not think that Aristotle’s rendition of happiness is complete and does contains flaws.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s eudaimonia (happiness) is living well and doing well in the affairs of the world. Happiness is life’s aim which like I stated before, involves both moral and intellectual arête. Aristotle states that “The happy life for a man is a life of the conscious following of a rule”. So to elaborate, a person must use their moral and intellect virtues to use good judgment to know what the right rule is, then they must follow and obey the rule even if they don’t understand the rule. So in order for us to do this we must possess moral goodness and goodness of intellect.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle believes that there is only one goal, one ultimate end for every individual—that is eudaimonia, translated as happiness, not as a feeling but happiness as the highest human good or a life full of activity. He claims that a person should live a way of life distinct from the lives of animals, where they only live for the sake of living or pleasure.1 As human beings, people should use their power of speech to communicate and make rational decisions within a polity, striving to live their lives up to their full potential and to their full capacity for a happy life.2 The life of politics, the via activa, is thus the key to the chief good or the best life for humans; however, the life of action must be of certain type of quality, in accordance with reason, since different actions may lead to the good or the bad life. In other words, a person’s actions must be in line with arête, with virtue or excellence.3…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While, humans strive for happiness it is not always obviously shown or even the main goal of a specific culture. Unfortunately, not every country is able to be considered extremely happy like the Danes; who are among the highest ranked nations in the world when it comes to happiness (Wiking, viii). For instance, East Asians have “lower happiness expectations”, then most Americans who are accustomed to smiles and uplifting conversations on a day to day basis…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virtue Ethics

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    has more to do with character and the nature of what it is to be…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Eudomnia

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Are you happy? This question is asked of people by friends, parents and psychiatrists alike. What happiness consists of for each person seems, at first glance, to be entirely subjective in that is it up to each individual person to define what the happy-making ingredients of her life are. This dissertation centrally involves an interpretation of Aristotle’s eudaimonia, often translated as ‘happiness’. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is an inquiry into the chief good for human beings, and according to Aristotle everyone agrees that this chief good is ‘happiness’, however there is major disagreement about what ‘happiness’ consists of. What follows critically interprets Aristotle’s eudaimonia through a close reading of his arguments. Once Aristotle’s eudaimonia is explicated, it is used to question the supposedly subjective conception of happiness that the happiness literature argues is pervasive. Finally, Aristotle’s eudaimonia is defended as a theory of well-being against a charge of perfectionism. It is argued that Aristotle’s eudaimonia commits its adherents to maximising virtuous activity at all times, that is, to perfect themselves. It is this interpretation of Aristotle that seeks to undermine…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays